1 / 26

Effect of roof impacts on coupling between wave response and sloshing in tanks of LNG-carriers

Effect of roof impacts on coupling between wave response and sloshing in tanks of LNG-carriers. B. Molin, F. Remy (Ecole Centrale Marseille) A. Ledoux, N. Ruiz (Principia). Experimental and numerical roll RAOs Irregular sea-state Tp=1.6s, Hs=0.034m. Tanks 1 and 2: 19cm.

saima
Télécharger la présentation

Effect of roof impacts on coupling between wave response and sloshing in tanks of LNG-carriers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effect of roof impacts on coupling between wave response and sloshing in tanks of LNG-carriers B. Molin, F. Remy (Ecole Centrale Marseille) A. Ledoux, N. Ruiz (Principia)

  2. Experimental and numerical roll RAOs Irregular sea-state Tp=1.6s, Hs=0.034m. Tanks 1 and 2: 19cm Tank 1: 39cm. Tank 2: 19cm.

  3. ROOF AT FREE SURFACE. ADJUSTMENT OF ROLL VISCOUS COEFFICIENT ROLL RAO HS = 6 cm

  4. ROOF AT FREE SURFACE. ADJUSTMENT OF ROLL VISCOUS COEFFICIENT ROLL RAO HS = 12 cm

  5. FLAT ROOF 16 cm ABOVE FREE SURFACE. HS = 6 cm, TP = 1.6 s (NO IMPACTS) ROLL RAO

  6. FLAT ROOF 16 cm ABOVE FREE SURFACE. HS = 6 cm, TP = 1.6 s (NO IMPACTS) RAO OF THE FIRST SLOSHING MODE

  7. FLAT ROOF 16 cm ABOVE FREE SURFACE. HS = 6 cm, TP = 1.6 s (NO IMPACTS) RAO OF THE THIRD SLOSHING MODE

  8. FLAT ROOF 16 cm ABOVE FREE SURFACE. HS = 12 cm, TP = 1.6 s (A FEW IMPACTS) ROLL RAO

  9. FLAT ROOF 16 cm ABOVE FREE SURFACE. EXPERIMENTAL RAOS OF THE FIRST SLOSHING MODE HS = 6, 9, 12 cm TP = 1.6 s

  10. EXPERIMENTAL ROLL RAOS FLAT ROOF AT 16, 11, 5 cm. HS = 12 cm TP = 1.6 s HS = 6 cm

  11. CHAMFERED ROOFS

  12. MESH FOR DIOCUVE

  13. EXPERIMENTAL ROLL RAOS FLAT VS. CHAMFERED 16 cm ABOVE F.S. HS = 6 cm TP = 1.6 s

  14. EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL ROLL RAOS FLAT VS. CHAMFERED 16 cm ABOVE F. S. HS = 6 cm TP = 1.6 s FLAT

  15. EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL ROLL RAOS CHAMFERED ROOF 16 cm ABOVE F. S. HS = 12 cm TP = 1.6 s

  16. EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL ROLL RAOS CHAMFERED ROOF 11 cm ABOVE F. S. HS = 6 cm TP = 1.6 s

  17. EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL ROLL RAOS CHAMFERED ROOF 11 cm ABOVE F. S. HS = 12 cm TP = 1.6 s

  18. Conclusions • Roof impacts do not seem to affect the roll response much • Free surface non-linearities play a major role • Chamfers effective by reducing free surface length • Exploitation of test data still incomplete (roof impact loads)

  19. FLAT ROOF 11 cm ABOVE FREE SURFACE

More Related