1 / 32

SCS Building Committee: Enhancing Space for Collaboration and Innovation

The SCS Building Committee, comprising members Guy Blelloch, Randy Bryant, Sharon Burks, Peter Lee, Jim Skees, and Manuela Veloso, has met weekly since October 2004 to discuss the space needs for the SCS program. Their focus includes lab spaces, collaborative areas, classrooms, and technology requirements. With input from over 320 survey participants and visits to 30+ campuses, they aim to create a flexible and integrated environment that maintains transparency, supports research, and enhances student and faculty collaboration.

salma
Télécharger la présentation

SCS Building Committee: Enhancing Space for Collaboration and Innovation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCS Building Committee

  2. The SCS Building Committee Members: • Guy Blelloch • Randy Bryant • Sharon Burks • Peter Lee • Jim Skees • Manuela Veloso

  3. Met weekly since October, 2004 • Discussed space needs, lab space, collaborative spaces, flexibility, classrooms, transparency, technology, … • Taken two surveys • Online survey had 320 participants • Visited over 30 buildings on 15+ campuses • Met with various people about their experience

  4. The Program

  5. Program Space (205K GSF) • Undergraduate Core for SCS (18K NSF) • 12K Classrooms/Cluster • 5K Offices for teaching staff/TAs/UG Orgs. • 1K Undergraduate lounge • Research (97K NSF) • 57K Offices • 22K Project rooms (labs) • 16K Common spaces • 4K Auditorium – possibly dual use • Dean’s suite (3K NSF) • Planetary Robotics (5K NSF) Assuming 60% efficiency

  6. Space Breakdown

  7. Space Breakdown

  8. Open Issues • Needs to be verified by architects • Mix of project room sizes • How much of project room allocation to put towards “collaborative workspaces” • How much to put toward small machine rooms? • Large machine room? • Dual use of auditorium as classroom? • Atrium/Lobby as NSF or GSF?

  9. Program Goals : Site

  10. Program Goals : Site 1. Indoor above grade Connection to NSH • Our School is very integrated • Maintain interactions • Maintain space flexibility • Maintain shared services

  11. Program Goals : Site 1. Indoor above grade Connection to NSH Survey found that the bridge between Wean and NSH is the most important feature of NSH

  12. Program Goals : Site 2. Easy Connection to the Cut Good connection to UC and East Campus

  13. Program Goals : Site 2. Easy Connection to the Cut Improve access from other West Campus buildings to East Campus

  14. Program Goals : Site 2. Easy Connection to the Cut Create a Pathway to Craig from East Campus

  15. Program Goals : Site 2. Easy Connection to the Cut Campus Tour

  16. Program Goals : Site 3. Visitor’s entrance on Forbes

  17. Program Goals : Site 3. Visitor’s entrance on Forbes

  18. Program Goals : Site 4. Accessible Undergraduate “core”

  19. Dorms U Center 4. Accessible Undergraduate “core”

  20. Classes (# of seats) 4. Accessible Undergraduate “core” 300 1150 190 200 310 860 110 540

  21. Program Goals : Site Research 4. Accessible Undergraduate “core” Avoid too much traffic through research space

  22. Program Goals : Site 5. Create a “quad” with greenspace(s)

  23. Program Goals : Site 5. Create a “quad” with greenspace(s) Lots of light and reasonable views

  24. Program Goals : Site 6. Underground Parking

  25. Program Goals : Building A building for people, not machines.

  26. Program Goals : Building 1. Collaborative Workspaces Cornell UIUC In teaching space In research space Open small group work areas

  27. Program Goals : Building Ohio State 1. Collaborative Workspaces Open project areas Bridges Outdoor spaces Cornell Cafe UIUC

  28. Program Goals : Building 2. Natural Light U. Washington Atrium Services Student Offices Labs Faculty Offices All “people” spaces have natural light

  29. Program Goals : Building 2. Natural Light Chicago Ohio State Chicago

  30. Program Goals : Building 3. “Transparency” Faculty offices Library classrooms hallway project area From conference room Work area Needs to be carefully balanced with privacy.

  31. Program Goals : Building Other Goals • Support and display our “culture” • Flexibility – perhaps raised floor plenum • Individual control of temperature • Faculty on main hallways • Support various forms of grouping • Avoid ugly dropped ceilings

  32. 10’ 15’ Secondary secure hallway Kitchen Collaborative Workroom 16’ printer Glass main hallway Glass 18’ Project Rooms Support Staff 12’ Students, Research Staff, Visitors Faculty

More Related