1 / 15

R&D Structure in a Changing World

R&D Structure in a Changing World. Subcommittee 04-03 Tom Tirpak, Larry Schwartz, David Kashdan (Co-chairs) IRI Meeting 2005 Tucson, AZ. Overview. Objective/Scope

sandrabender
Télécharger la présentation

R&D Structure in a Changing World

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. R&D Structure in a Changing World Subcommittee 04-03 Tom Tirpak, Larry Schwartz, David Kashdan (Co-chairs) IRI Meeting 2005 Tucson, AZ

  2. Overview • Objective/Scope • To combine IRI ROR research on “Innovation Games” with the body of knowledge on R&D organization structure, and thereby identify trends and actionable guidelines for managing R&D structures and competencies that support an organization’s market and technology strategy. • Dates • Start: 2/2004, SIS in November, Planned Completion: 12/2005? • Value Proposition • Improved R&D effectiveness. • Increased alignment with corporate strategy. • Provide framework for discussion about organizational issues Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  3. Participants • Co-Chairs • Tom Tirpak (Motorola) • David Kashdan (Eastman) • Larry Schwartz (Intellectual ASSETS Inc). • University Partners • Roger Miller Montreal Polytechnique • CIMS/NCSU • Members • Thanks to the ~25 participants Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  4. 04-3 R&D Structure in a Changing World • Status: • CIMS/NCSC survey completed, 66 participants in 16 industries • MINE Survey in process, ~150 interviews in 2 business sectors complete. • RTM article outlined • SIS planned (November, 2005). • Remain in Phase III Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  5. CIMS/NCSU Summary • 66 Interviews (2/3 IRI Companies) • 16 Industries Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  6. Our Investigation • Collected Data using survey form and website • http://www.ncsu-survey.org Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  7. Revenue Spectrum of Organizational Structure Corporate Decentralized Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  8. MINE Study • Games • R&D Structure • Real Cost of Innovation Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  9. R&D Structure Survey • Multiyear, Multiindustry study, lead researchers from Montreal Polytechnique • 143 surveys completed to date • Plan to survey 1200 firms • 20 sectors • 4 continents • Web-based version of the instrument: • Initial personnel contact with CTOs, VP R&D level • Self-paced responses • Instant feedback / comparison to best performers and average Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  10. Major Learnings • "Game" (Business Design or Strategy) is the largest determinant of organizational structure • Pioneer Entry  Battle for Architecture  Mass Customization • Engineering IP  Battlefield of Systems • Startup with IP  "Safe Journey"  Optimizing But…There exists an overlay of other factors -- Roger Miller, Montreal Polytechnic Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  11. Other Factors • Ubiquitous IT • Globalization • Division of Labor (What is core and what's not) • Customer Intimacy • Cyclical Patterns of Centralization and Decentralization • Cost Savings Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  12. R&D Structure Influencers Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  13. MINE • Real Cost of Innovation • ~30% of Innovation is performed outside of the functional R&D structure in other functions (Marketing, Manufacturing, Sales, HSE, etc. Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  14. RTM Paper • Hypothesis 1: Selection of R&D Structure is heavily influenced by “Games of Value Creation” • Hypothesis 2: There are “passing trends” that affect all structures • Ubiquitous IT • Globalization • Division of Labor (What’s core and what is not) • Customer Intimacy • Cyclical Patterns of Centralization and Decentralization (e.g. Du Pont every 12 years, Raychem every 3 years). • Hypothesis 3: Beyond the structure of the R&D Organization, there are capabilities and processes that contribute substantially to innovation and the cost thereof. Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

  15. Next Steps • June to November • Continue MINE survey • * IRI Participation requested and essential • Present SIS at November IRI Meeting • Complete draft of RTM Article Subcommittee Name Presenter; Location

More Related