1 / 10

Conserving Greater Sage Grouse

Conserving Greater Sage Grouse. BLM/FS/FWS Greater Sage Grouse Conservation Initiative Jim Lyons Counselor, Lands and Minerals Management Department of the Interior March 13, 2014. Background. 2006 WAFWA Greater Sage-Grouse Comprehensive Conservation Strategy

saniya
Télécharger la présentation

Conserving Greater Sage Grouse

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conserving Greater Sage Grouse BLM/FS/FWS Greater Sage GrouseConservation Initiative Jim Lyons Counselor, Lands and Minerals Management Department of the Interior March 13, 2014

  2. Background • 2006 WAFWA Greater Sage-Grouse Comprehensive Conservation Strategy • March 23, 2010 FWS “warranted but precluded” determination • December 2011, Federal/state partnership meeting • December 2011, BLM releases NTT report • March 2013, Conservation Objectives Team report

  3. Background(cont.) Conservation Objectives Team (COT) report: • Collaboration of 10 state F&W and 5 FWS members • Built on the 2006 WAFWA Greater Sage-Grouse Comprehensive Conservation Strategy Objective: “reverse negative population trends and achiev[e] a neutral or positive population trend” • Identified Priority Areas of Conservation (PACs): “key habitats that are essential for sage-grouse conservation” • Encourages “that important habitats outside of PACs be conserved to the extent possible” • Identifies conservation threats and conservation objectives and measures for each threat

  4. Background(cont.) Conservation Objectives Team (COT) report: Conservation objectives: • “Stop the bleeding” – • “Requires eliminating activities known to negatively impact sage-grouse and their habitats or re-designing these activities to achieve the same goal” • “Maintenance of the integrity of PACs is the essential foundation for sage-grouse conservation” • Implement targeted habitat restoration • Develop and implement state and federal strategies, incentive-based conservation actions and regulatory mechanisms • Develop and implement proactive, voluntary conservation actions • Develop and implement monitoring plans • Prioritize, fund, and implement research to address uncertainties

  5. Key Questions • Do the BLM and FS plans address the conservation threats identified in the COT report for each population? • Are the conservation strategies consistent and rational? • Can differences be justified? • How do state SG conservation plans align/conflict with federal plans? • Is the cumulative conservation effort (BLM/FS/states) adequate to conserve the species?

  6. Summary • Completion of proposed plans • Assessment of cumulative conservation strategy for each population and WAFWA zones • Mitigation strateg(ies) • Adaptive management strategy • Monitoring and evaluation plan • Fire and invasive spp. Strategy • Final plans to FWS for listing decision Key remaining tasks:

More Related