1 / 12

Dose Predictions for Moon Astronauts

Dose Predictions for Moon Astronauts. Nicholas Bachmann, Ian Rittersdorf Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences University of Michigan. Image Source: www.astromax.com. Abstract. NASA has proposed a return to the moon within the next decade

sanura
Télécharger la présentation

Dose Predictions for Moon Astronauts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dose Predictions for Moon Astronauts Nicholas Bachmann, Ian Rittersdorf Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences University of Michigan Image Source: www.astromax.com

  2. Abstract • NASA has proposed a return to the moon within the next decade • New lunar missions will be longer than Apollo’s, and may lead to a permanent moon base • Effects of radiation on these missions will have to be planned for, but are manageable

  3. Main Dose Sources • Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) • Solar Energetic Particles (SEP) • Intrinsic Lunar Radiation (Soil) Image Source : www.archives.gov

  4. Galactic Cosmic Rays • Composition: • 85% protons • 14% alpha particles • 1% heavy nuclei • Heavy nuclei are very dangerous because of the energy they have (proportional to Z2) • Hard to measure precisely • Current Models are believed to be 25% accurate

  5. Solar Energetic Particles • SEPs consist primarily of protons and alpha particles • Formed on active surfaces of the sun • Lower energy particles than GCRs • Higher flux of particles than GCRs Image Source: www.nrl.navy.mil

  6. Solar Flares • Solar flares emit considerable amounts of radiation, up to tens of Gy • Between Apollo 16 and 17 , one of the largest solar flares ever recorded occurred. If the flare had occurred during a mission — even inside their shielded spacecraft, the astronauts would have absorbed lethal doses within 10 hours

  7. Lunar Thorium Hotspots • Because space suits protect well against α and low energy gamma, Th in the soil is not a major concern • If any kind of space station were constructed on the moon, radon would be a major concern if lunar soil was used in cement Image Source: www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=5357

  8. Apollo Mission Doses • No significant difference between doses of zero/high time mission implies surface Th/K is irrelevant • High Apollo 14 dose is due to path directly through Van Allen belt

  9. Nuclear Radiation from a Planetary Surface http://www.astro.umd.edu/~mcfadden/slides/2001_Mars_Odyssey/11.jpg

  10. Effects on Health • Worst-case scenario estimates an increase in carcinogenic risk of 45% to interplanetary astronauts • NASA/NCRP goal is 3% • Is difficult to quantify due to the uncertainty in the knowledge of the biological response of to particles of various atomic numbers and energies

  11. Conclusions • Elevated or even fatal does to astronauts are possible outside of Low Earth Orbit if proper planning is not done • Radionuclides may be a concern for lunar bases that use soil for building materials • Due to longer travel times, manned missions beyond the moon would have to have increased shielding in case of solar flares

  12. Selected References • Biomedical Results of Apollo, NASA, 1975 • Radiation Effects and Protection for Moon and Mars Missions, Parnell, Watts, and Armstrong, 1998 • Seeing Lunar Thorium More Clearly, http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=5357, Available 03/29/2007

More Related