1 / 13

Lucie Vítková

Forestry professionals’ knowledge of and attitudes towards the practice of continuous cover forestry (CCF). Lucie Vítková University College Dublin, School of Agriculture & Food Science, Forestry Department, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Irish forests. Photo: Dr Brian Tobin.

sawyer
Télécharger la présentation

Lucie Vítková

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forestry professionals’ knowledge of and attitudes towards the practice of continuous cover forestry (CCF) Lucie Vítková University College Dublin, School of Agriculture & Food Science, Forestry Department, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

  2. Irish forests Photo: Dr Brian Tobin

  3. Why focusing on attitudes? • CCF represents an unfamiliar and novel approach to forest management • Implementation of new management is influenced by: • Attitudes • Knowledge • Values • Attitudes of forestry professionals -> Limited

  4. Methods • On-line survey • General information on CCF • Statements framed in the context of issues regarding CCF • Demographic questions • Additional comments • Participants • Coillte Teo. • Teagasc • Forest Service • Association of Irish Forestry Consultants • Other forest management companies in Ireland

  5. Use of CCF • 32% actively use CCF – forest managers • 24% do not use CCF – forest managers • 34% do not use CCF – forestry consultants/advisors • 10% did not mention

  6. Understanding of CCF – all participants • 98% familiar with continuous cover forestry • Silvicultural systems associated with CCF • Shelterwood systems (26%) • Selection systems (22%) • Not mentioned (27%) • natural regeneration, thinning, long-term retention, low impact silviculture, etc.

  7. CCF users (32% respondents) • Reasons for CCF use: • Economic benefit • Broadleaved species • Amenity and recreation • Certification • Extent of CCF use - limited • Area managed under CCF <10% • CCF applied for <10 years

  8. CCF non-users (24% respondents) • Over 1/3 not planning to use CCF in the future ‘... not convinced of CCF, especially with regards to economics...’ ‘... CCF is not a conventional system in Ireland ...’ ‘... local forests are too small and the tree species are not suitable to CCF...’ • Resistance from forest owners: ‘... forest owners desire to generate revenue through clearfell...’ ‘... private forest owners want a ‘fast’ return but CCF has a ‘stigma’ of long term...’

  9. Constraints of CCFall respondents • Can they be overcome? • Education • Training • Research • Increasing awareness

  10. Drivers of CCF - all respondents

  11. Attitudes to CCF

  12. Conclusions • CCF users over-represented • CCF = new concept in Ireland • It can take time for a new concept to be accepted and practiced • Training and research • Understanding the concept -> avoid confusion in terminology • Feasibility studies -> possible markets, transport and processing • Promoting and awareness raising • Home-grown and high-grade construction timber • Making forest owners aware of CCF => Forest owners determine management objectives • ‘... CCF can be extremely difficult but also logical and natural ...’

  13. Funding: COFORD - Council for Forest Research and Development Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine under the National Development Plan, Ireland

More Related