1 / 27

Evolution of Amtrak’s Concrete Crosstie and Fastening System Program

Evolution of Amtrak’s Concrete Crosstie and Fastening System Program. Joseph A. Smak Director of Track Standards and Specifications Concrete Crosstie & Fastening System Symposium June 7, 2012. Presentation Outline. Why Concrete Ties? Timeline of Concrete Tie Manufacture

scot
Télécharger la présentation

Evolution of Amtrak’s Concrete Crosstie and Fastening System Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evolution of Amtrak’s Concrete Crosstie and Fastening System Program Joseph A. Smak Director of Track Standards and Specifications Concrete Crosstie & Fastening System Symposium June 7, 2012

  2. Presentation Outline • Why Concrete Ties? • Timeline of Concrete Tie Manufacture • Concrete Tie Problems • Concrete Tie Design Changes • Elastic Fasteners • Shoulders • Tie Pads and Insulators • Switch Ties • Future Considerations

  3. Why Concrete Ties? • Manufactured Product • Uniformity • Better control of tolerances in rail seat leading to better track geometry • Well adapted for elastic fasteners • Better Track Stability • Weighs 790 pounds compared to 240 for hardwood tie • Elastic fasteners control longitudinal rail forces better • Stiffer track promotes better track geometry • Track Renewal Installation Benefits • High quality track with fewer track occupancies • Facilitate rail change in the process of tie replacement

  4. Timeline of Manufacture • First concrete tie manufactured & installed – 1978 • Manufacturers: • Santa Fe San Vel: 1978 to 1983 ~ 1.0 million • Lonestar: 1983 to 1986 ~ 0.3 million • Rocla: 1990 to 2000 ~ 1.4 million • Rocla: 2003 to 2011 ~ 1.3 million • Total concrete ties purchased to date ~ 4.0 million

  5. Concrete Tie Problems – ASR ASR results when cement alkalis react with certain soluble forms of silica in the aggregate component of a concrete, forming an alkali-silica gel at the aggregate’s surface. This formation, often referred to as “reaction rim” has a very strong affinity for water, and thus has a tendency to swell. These expanding compounds can cause internal pressures sufficiently strong to cause cracking of the paste matrix which can then result in a compromised concrete having an open door to additional moisture and an increasing rate of deterioration.

  6. Concrete Tie Problems – DEF Delayed Ettringite Formation (DEF) is a type of internal sulfate attack that occurs in concrete that has reached certain high temperature thresholds in the first few hours of placement. At these temperatures, normal formation of ettringite (calcium sulfoaluminate hydrate) is impeded until after concrete has hardened. When ettringite does form, it can cause deleterious expansion, resulting in cracking.

  7. Concrete Tie Problems

  8. Concrete Tie Problems

  9. Concrete Tie Problems

  10. Concrete Tie Problems – Lone Star • Approx. 300,000 ties manufactured between 1982 and 1986 • Cracking first detected in 1986 • Spider cracking with slow progression to failure within a few years • Attributed to an alkali-silicone reaction (ASR) and low air entrainment • All ties installed in stretches replaced between 1990 & 1995 • Others similarly afflicted (CSX, LIRR, Transit Systems)

  11. Concrete Tie Problems – Rocla • Approximately 1,400,000 ties manufactured between 1990 and 2000 • Population of cracking ties & year of first detection: • 1990 to 1992: 360,000 ties / cracks detected in 1999 (7+ years from manufacture) • 1993 to 1994: 323,000 ties / cracks detected in 2006 (12+ years from manufacture) • 1996: 133,000 ties / cracks detected in 2007 (11 years from manufacture) • 1997: 118,000 ties / cracks detected in 2001 (4 years from manufacture) • 1998 to 1999: 314,000 ties / cracks detected in 2007 (8+ years from manufacture) • Most ties exhibit hairline cracking with a slow propagation rate • Some ties exhibit spider cracking with a more rapid propagation rate (predominantly the ties manufactured in 1997) • Tie cracking attributed to ASR and DEF, result of contamination in the fine aggregate and possible high curing temperatures • Others similarly afflicted (Metro North, LIRR, MBTA)

  12. Concrete Ties Problems – Operations • Severity of speed drops • 1 failed tie – can run 150 MPH • 2 consecutive failed ties – track slow ordered to 60 MPH • 3 consecutive failed ties – track slow ordered to 15 MPH • 4 consecutive failed ties – track out-of-service • Ties often fail quickly, spread to adjacent ties • Cracks on side and cannot be seen without removing ballast • Cast shoulder and tie depth make removal/insertion difficult • Track with tie failures are difficult to surface

  13. Concrete Tie Problems - Operations • Amtrak has contracted with HNTB for tie evaluation by qualified inspectors • Tie evaluation done by walking with Amtrak • Ties are graded based on visual inspection: • Ties replaced with concrete and interlaced wood ties are noted • Cracked ties are graded 2 thru 5 in order of extent of cracking • Grades 3 and above are marked • Data accumulated to track trends, identify critical areas, program replacement programs • UICU under contract to the Law Dept., also to assist with design changes • CTL used for periodic testing and monitoring

  14. Concrete Tie Design Changes • Santa Fe San Vel 1978-83 • Lonestar 1983-86 • Rocla 1990-2000 • New Rocla 2003 to present • In 1992, increased air entrainment from 2%-5% to 4%-6%

  15. Concrete Tie Design Changes

  16. Concrete Tie Design Changes

  17. Concrete Tie Design Changes

  18. Concrete Tie Design Changes

  19. Concrete Tie Design Changes

  20. Concrete Tie Design Changes • Major changes to Amtrak Tie Specification in 2003 • Design change from 8 7-strand reinforcing wires to 24 individual indented reinforcing wires to increase tensile strength • Established tighter limitations on pre-set curing temperatures and new control system installed to closely monitor curing temperatures • Use of manufactured sand (fine aggregate) to eliminate most all potential reactive contaminants that could contribute to ASR/DEF reactivity • Use of up to 20% but not less than 15% fly ash in the cementitious portion of the mix for even greater resistance to formation of ASR and DEF • Additional third party (CTL) testing of materials and hardened concrete • Increase Q/C process • Increase air entrainment from 4%-6% to 4%-7%

  21. Concrete Tie Design Changes

  22. Concrete Tie Design Changes

  23. Elastic Fasteners • 1978-1986 PR 601-A • 1990- 1995 e 2055 • Mid 1995 to present FastClip

  24. Cast Shoulders • 1983-1995 Single bi-axial ragged stem • 2003 Single button stem • 2010 Double stem FastClip

  25. Tie Pads and Insulators • 5 mm Ohio rubber pad • 6 1/2 mm irradiated EVA pad • 6 1/2 mm polyurethane pad (KD, WB)

  26. Switch Ties • Dapped concrete ties • Steel tie extensions • Hollow steel ties

  27. Future Consideration • Continue increased Q/C program • Continue third party concrete tie testing • Continue project with UICU on tie design • Consider possible tie design change • Continue FRA project with FRA and Volpe Center • Continue other FRA projects concerning concrete ties; NDT, for example

More Related