1 / 8

Mauri Åhlberg , University of Helsinki, Finland

CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROM FINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008. Mauri Åhlberg , University of Helsinki, Finland Email : mauri.ahlberg@helsinki.fi , www.helsinki.fi/people/mauri.ahlberg. Research problem.

scot
Télécharger la présentation

Mauri Åhlberg , University of Helsinki, Finland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CONCEPT MAPPING AS AN INNOVATION: DOCUMENTS, MEMORIES AND NOTES FROMFINLAND, SWEDEN, ESTONIA AND RUSSIA 1984 – 2008 Mauri Åhlberg, University of Helsinki, Finland Email: mauri.ahlberg@helsinki.fi , www.helsinki.fi/people/mauri.ahlberg

  2. Research problem • What do we know about Novakian type of concept mapping as an innovation adapting Rogers’ theory of communication and diffusion of innovations?

  3. Communicating for innovations • Rogers (1983 – 2003) claims in his theory of communication and diffusion of innovations that adopters of any new innovation or idea could be categorized as innovators (2.5%), early adopters (13.5%), early majority (34%), late majority (34%) and laggards (16%). • Åhlberg in the 1980s was first an early adopter, and then a co-innovator when he with his research group created what they called improved concept mapping.

  4. Data and methods • The main data and conclusions are based on documents, memories and notes from Finland, but also from Sweden, Estonia and Russia 1984 – 2008. • Documents are analyzed qualitatively

  5. Concept mapping as research method and quality tool • One of the main innovative uses of concept mapping in Finland has been its use and development as a research method and quality tool. • E.g. as a research method: transformation of text proposition by proposition into a concept map (Åhlberg & Ahoranta 2008)

  6. Knowledgerepresentationmethods • Concept mapping is compared to other graphic representation tools, in particular mind mapping and clustering (based on Åhlberg 1990, 1993 and 2007, Åhlberg & Ahoranta 2002) • Concept mapping vs. mind mapping, http://www.multilingual-matters.net/irgee/011/0119/irgee0110119.pdf • Concept mapping vs. clustering (Rico 1983 – 2008), Way, http://www.gabrielerico.com/Main/ClusteringSampleVignettes.htm

  7. The main features about history of concept mapping in Finland, Sweden,Estonia and Russia 1984 – 2008 • Based on knowndocuments: • Finland: Åhlberg’s R&D group (1987 – 2008) • Sweden: Åhlberg (1993b) ”begreppskartor” • Estonia: Poom, K. 1992: ”Moistekaart ja moistekaarttehnika” Haridus 7/8, 58 – 60. • Russia: Malinen, R. 2001. Master’sThesis

  8. Conclusions • Based on scattered evidence mind mapping is more spread and used than concept mapping in all these countries. • In Finland concept mapping has stronger position than in Sweden, Estonia and Russia. • More research is needed to reveal history and development of Novakian type of concept mapping both regionally and globally.

More Related