DNP 820 WEEK 5 IMPLEMENTATION INTO PRACTICE GCU
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course: https://www.tutorialsexperts.com/product/dnp-820-week-5-implementation-into-practice-gcu/ Details: The Institute of Medicine set a goal that 90% of health care decisions should be evidence-based by 2020. At best guess, less than 10% of decisions use best evidence. Bridging the gap between research, findings, and practice implementation is one strategy to meet this important goal. This assignment will help you to find gaps that may be used for your project. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: u2022tReview the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) website to complete the assignment. u2022tDoctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. u2022tThis assignment uses a rubric. Please Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. u2022tUse at least two additional scholarly research sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used. u2022tYou are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Directions: Select a practice from the AHRQ comparative effectiveness research site and write a 1,000-1,250 word paper that looks at a gap that exists between research findings and the implementation of those findings in practice. Include the following: 1.tDiscuss the practice. 2.tAssess to what extent the practice is being implemented. 3.tEvaluate the barriers to implementation into practice. 4.tPropose ways to overcome the barriers. 5.tDiscuss the resources available on the selected site to inform translation.Portfolio Practice Hours: Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the learner, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10. You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network. To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper: Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-820 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor. Implementation Into Practice t1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%t2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%t3 Satisfactory 79.00%t4 Good 87.00%t5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Contentt 10.0 %Discuss the PracticetDiscussion of the practice is not presented.tDiscussion of the practice is presented but is incomplete.tDiscussion of the practice is presented but at a cursory level.tDiscussion of the practice is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources.tDiscussion of the practice is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources.t 15.0 %Assess to what extent the practice is being implementedtAssessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is not presented.tAssessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is presented but is incomplete.tAssessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is presented but at a cursory level.tAssessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources.tAssessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources.t 15.0 %Evaluate the Barriers to Implementation Into PracticetEvaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is not presented.tEvaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is presented but is incomplete.tEvaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is presented but at a cursory level.tEvaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources.tEvaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources.t 15.0 %Propose Ways to Overcome the BarrierstProposed ways to overcome the barriers are not presented.tProposed ways to overcome the barriers are presented but are incomplete.tProposed ways to overcome the barriers are presented but at a cursory level.tProposed ways to overcome the barriers are clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources.tProposed ways to overcome the barriers are clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources.t 15.0 %Discuss the Resources Available on the Selected Site to Inform TranslationtDiscussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is not presented.tDiscussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is presented but is incomplete.tDiscussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is presented but at a cursory level.tDiscussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources.tDiscussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources.t 20.0 %Organization and Effectivenesst 7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposetPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.tThesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.tThesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.tThesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.tThesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.t 8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructiontStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.tSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.tArgument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.tArgument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.tClear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.t 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)tSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.tFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.tSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.tProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.tWriter is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.t 10.0 %Formatt 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)tTemplate is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.tAppropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.tAppropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.tAppropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.tAll format elements are correct.t 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)tSources are not documented.tDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.tSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.tSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.tSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.t 100 %Total Weightaget ttttt
★
★
★
★
★
50 views • 4 slides
