1 / 25

LEFT_HRS& BitBite

Presentation by Tai 2012/15/5. LEFT_HRS& BitBite. RHRS Optics? Timing?(Igor finish?) VDC t0 PreShower/Shower (not applicable). LIST. LHRS Optics (report shortly) Almost complete with dp not finalized Timing (report shortly) VDC t0 CER adc offset&gain PRL adc offset&gain Efficiency.

selena
Télécharger la présentation

LEFT_HRS& BitBite

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation by Tai 2012/15/5 LEFT_HRS& BitBite

  2. RHRS Optics? Timing?(Igor finish?) VDC t0 PreShower/Shower (not applicable) LIST • LHRS • Optics (report shortly) • Almost complete with dp not finalized • Timing (report shortly) • VDC t0 • CER adc offset&gain • PRL adc offset&gain • Efficiency

  3. MWDC T0 Time-to-Distance Conversion Relative wire position Tracking help etc.. LIST • BIGBITE • Optics • Trigger Plane • ADC (offset &gain) • TDC (offset)

  4. LHRS-->Timing Result • Define: TOF = (s2time-s1time)-(s2pathl-s1pathl)/(0.3m/ns) • With mean = -0.22 ns and sigma = 0.59 ns

  5. Timing Process • 1. Calibrate the left/right tdc pmt separately • diff = LT[i] – LT[i+1], where we require hit in both bars (t_pad[0] = i, t_pad[1] = i+1) • Align the “diff” value to zero using the middle bar as the reference. • 2. Calibrate left/right tdc required hit in the mid-plane. This will give a constant offset to one side.

  6. Timing Process • 3. Check diff time between bar each plane separately. • i.e. S1 time diff (left) and S2 time diff (below)

  7. Timing Process • 4. Now check the time difference between plane. Adjust additional offset to align beta = v/c = p/E = 1 for electron selection cut.

  8. Optics • 4 reconstructed variables (dp,phi,theta,y) • Each variable can be calculated for its transform matrix independently.

  9. Optics • Vertex: Using run 1237 as the best match for survey for mispointing to the center. At 16.5 deg.Dz = 2.31 mm, Dy = 0.54 mm • Result: sigma (2.78 - 3.89 )mm • peak 0 mean 148.41 mm sigma 2.93 mm • Peak 1 mean 123.33 mm sigma 3.20 mm • peak 2 mean 98.41 mm sigma 3.32 mm • peak 3 mean 73.60 mm sigma 3.12 mm • peak 4 mean 49.27 mm sigma 3.59 mm • peak 5 mean 24.59 mm sigma 2.78 mm • peak 6 mean 0.42 mm sigma 2.85 mm • peak 7 mean -24.57 mm sigma 3.89 mm • peak 8 mean -49.19 mm sigma 3.93 mm • peak 9 mean -74.02 mm sigma 3.23 mm • peak 10 mean -99.42 mm sigma 4.60 mm • peak 11 mean -124.69 mm sigma 3.36 mm • peak 12 mean -149.38 mm sigma 3.15 mm

  10. Optics • Check other runs with different L_theta and/or with sieve. • The example of the sieve data for run 1234 • vertex • peak 0 mean 72.56 mm sigma 3.83 mm • peak 1 mean -74.63 mm sigma 3.26 mm • vertex vs ph

  11. Optics • Sieve: using Optics-C (13foils) run 1238

  12. Optics • The Sieve data is used twice for both theta and phi reconstruction. • Hence, twice carefully hole selection and cut have to be made. • (Sieve reconstruction for dummy 15 cm)

  13. Sieve reconstruction • Sieve X = X_tg+L*theta_tg • Sieve Y = Y_tg +L*theta_tg • L = distance to Sieve from Hall center

  14. Unfortunately, I cannot make the code work yet. :'( Waiting for help from others Optics • OPPS!! • One more thing left • Momentum dp

  15. To calibrate the ADC for the trigger plane is not as simple as the cer &/ll Prl. The offset is adjusted using LA/RA raw The gain factor is much more trouble. BigBite • Trigger plane Calibration • TDC (not yet) • ADC

  16. 1. gain match left and right PMT on the same bar 2. gain match each bar BigBite • As we need the result to reflect a good • dE vs E energy deposit • Where dE energy is calculated from sqrt(LE*RE) • So ....

  17. BigBite • Ideally we want LE = RE. • First I rotate LE vs RE by 45 degee which become LE-RE vs LE+RE • The slope(m) will yield the change we need • (1-m)LA = (1+m)RA

  18. BigBite • This is the result of LE vs RE after calibration for plane e pad #10

  19. Plane dE: sqrt(LE*RE)(black),LE(blue),RE(red)

  20. Plane E: sqrt(LE*RE)(black),LE(blue),RE(red)

  21. BigBite • So we have the gain match for left/right PMT on the same bar done. (except bar #1 plane dE) • LE vs RE for dE plane with LH2, 400 MeV • Left are uncorrected one. Right are corrected value.

  22. BigBite • Same plot for E plane.

  23. BigBite • I am at the point to determine method to use to aline gain factor relative to each bar. • Option 1: • Using data from PSTAR to construct the possible energy lost in dE vs E plane • (figure on the left)

  24. This is the 400 MeV LH2 elastic run. As seen, the dEvsE is not yet good.

  25. Bitbite • Option 2 • Graphic cut area for each Energy blob and create itself pattern? • Any suggestion??

More Related