1 / 18

PUBLIC WORKFARE: Overview of International Experience

PUBLIC WORKFARE: Overview of International Experience. Kalanidhi Subbarao Human Development Network (Social Protection) The World Bank March 23, 2011. What is Public Workfare?.

seth
Télécharger la présentation

PUBLIC WORKFARE: Overview of International Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PUBLIC WORKFARE: Overview of International Experience KalanidhiSubbarao Human Development Network (Social Protection) The World Bank March 23, 2011

  2. What is Public Workfare? • Public workfare programs (also known as public works programs) provide temporary employment at low-wage rates mostly to unskilled and semi-skilled workers on labor-intensive projects such as road construction and maintenance, rural and urban infrastructure, sanitation and irrigation infrastructure, soil conservation, environmental protection, and more…

  3. Objectives…… Objectives varied by country: • Mitigation of covariate one-time shock affecting the entire country or regions (e.g.drought/floods/macro-economic shocks) • Mitigation of idiosyncratic shocks (temporary job losses) • Poverty relief – employment guarantee schemes • As a bridge to formal employment (training) • Complementary objective: create public goods

  4. Rationale…. • Quite effective in consumption-smoothing, • Can perform an insurance function , • Can be rendered complementary to growth (via infrastructure building), • Potential for self-targeting, • Potential for regional targeting, • World-wide experience, including OECD, Africa, Latin America, South and East Asian countries

  5. Benefits and Costs • Benefits • Transfer benefits = wage rate, net of • transaction costs • Second round benefits from assets • Costs to the government • Administrative costs+wagecost+non-wage cost • Costs to participants: transaction costs

  6. Design issues: critical for success

  7. Design parameters (a) Wage rate….. • The level of the wage rate is critical for determining distributional outcomes, • To ensure program reaches the poorest, keep program wage no higher than the ruling market wage for unskilled labor • Not all countries succeeded in this design; varied experience

  8. Share of wages/Labor intensity. • Typically in both middle income and low-income countries, it varied between 0.3 to 0.6 • Depends on the nature of the asset being created, and the agency executing the program • Useful practice: assess labor content of various projects, and pick highest, in line with community preferences – Korea’s is good practice • Labor intensity in Korea was 70%

  9. Other design features • Choice of assets: community involvement • Seasonality – best to run when seasonal unemployment is highest • Gender aspects: program design can be adjusted to make it acceptable to women • Public/private/NGO/Donor participation

  10. Actual Experience: Korea’s Case

  11. Korea’s economic reform and Safety Nets: The Context • The main challenge: Restoring macroeconomic stability while limiting costs to real economy and adverse impacts on the vulnerable. • Korea’s financial crisis has dramatically reversed the impressive record in poverty reduction achieved since 1990. K. Subbarao - Household Risks and Safety Nets

  12. Impact of the crisis….. • Likewise, the unemployment rate increased four-fold... K. Subbarao - Household Risks and Safety Nets

  13. Getting the design right…..….. • A combination of Ministry- (supply-)driven and community-(demand-)driven projects • Careful selection of projects with highest labor intensity…estimated labor coefficients for several activities and picked the ones with highest labor intensity • Exceptional attention to quality of assets • Institutional detail: a director of public works supervised the entire operation K. Subbarao - Household Risks and Safety Nets

  14. Evaluation results

  15. Evaluation Results: Some examples India: Nation-wide program: 60 - 70% of participants belonged to poor households. • MEGS: The program contributed to a fall in the severity of poverty from 5.0% to 3.2% (Datt/Ravallion, 1992) • Argentina: 50% of beneficiaries came from the bottom 10%, and 80% from the bottom 20% of the income distribution.

  16. Argentina: HH income with and without PW transfer

  17. PW potential • The potential of the PWP is enormous both in countries that have experiences with these programs and especially in countries that never used them • Particularly helpful to address short term crisis-induced high unemployment • However, adapting PW programs in varying country situations is important

  18. PW Implementation: Toolkit….. • The various steps involved in the launching of PW program were presented in a Toolkit • Toolkit is all about implementation • You can download the Toolkit from the safety nets website: • http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SAFETYNETSANDTRANSFERS/Resources/281945-1131468287118/1876750-1274296604081/PWToolkitFinalVersion.pdf • THANK YOU

More Related