SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

seymour avatar
6 diapositives · 245 Views · May 24, 2012

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Pugh Selection Process Clarification] Date Submitted : [July 2000] Source: [James D. Allen] Company [ Eastman Kodak Co.] Address [66 Eastman Ave. Rochester,NY 14650-2015]

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) - slide 1
01 / 6Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:[Pugh Selection Process Clarification] Date Submitted: [July 2000] Source: [James D. Allen] Company [Eastman Kodak Co.] Address [66 Eastman Ave. Rochester,NY 14650-2015] Voice:[716-588-1906], FAX: [716-722-9053], E-Mail:[james.d.allen@kodak.com] Re: [] Abstract: [Clarification of the Selection process.] Purpose:[Describe refinements of the selection process to the Task Group] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co

  2. Pugh Selection Process Clarification James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co

  3. Pugh Intent • Controlled Convergence of order from Chaos • Use Tool to Communicate: • Criteria Definitions • Share opinions of Value through +,Same,- process • Make sure we have a common group understanding (as best we can) James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co

  4. Reference: Total Design, Stuart Pugh Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-41639-5 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co

  5. Pugh Intent • Use Worksheet to find the DATUM proposal - that is the best score. • Worksheets Document 000226rXP802.15_TG3 • Unknowns and no opinions are “Same” • Due July 21st Midnight EDT. • No Conference Call Tuesday July 16th • Also use ranking to establish discussion order. • Pugh needs a Datum James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co

  6. Pugh Intent • Next step takes place in PHY/ MAC/ SYSTEM Committees: • Take PLUS values from other proposals • Try to apply to Datum to Improve It • Start Selection Process -September/Nov. • Deviate from Pugh - NOT a NUMERIAL Process for TG3 • Too Many Other Factors make “Pure Pugh” unworkable. • Voting Process using Pareto Method James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co