1 / 25

Lecture 3-4

Lecture 3-4. Summarizing relationships among variables. Biases in OLS coefficients. Suppose you are interested in estimating the effects of education on wage. If your data contain IQ, then you can estimate: Model 1: (wage)= β 0 + β 1 (education)+ β 2 (experience)+ β 3 (IQ)

sezja
Télécharger la présentation

Lecture 3-4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 3-4 Summarizing relationships among variables

  2. Biases in OLS coefficients • Suppose you are interested in estimating the effects of education on wage. If your data contain IQ, then you can estimate: Model 1: (wage)=β0+β1(education)+β2(experience)+ β3(IQ) If your data do not have IQ, then you can only estimate: Model 2: (wage)=β0+β1(education)+β2(experience) IQ not included in the model

  3. By using the `Returns on Education 2’ data set the estimated models are: Model 1: Wage= -539.4 + 58.1(education)+17.4(experience)+5.6(IQ) Model 2: Wage= -272.5+ 76.2(education)+ 17.6(experience) Thus, the effect of education appear to be much larger for model 2.

  4. The reason why the effect of education appear to be higher for model 2 is that model 2 is suffering from `omitted variable biases’. When there is an omitted variable that affects both education and wage directly, the estimated effect of education will be biased.

  5. Model 2: (wage)=β0+β1(education)+β2(experience) (+)positively affects education (+)positively affects wage IQ Since IQ affects education positively, and at the same time, affects wage positively, β1 captures the mixed effects of education and IQ on wage. In this case, β1 is biased upward (i.e., β1 overstates the true effects of education)

  6. In general, suppose that there is an omitted variable Z, that affects both X and Y. β1 is biased upward if Y=β0+β1X or Y= β0+β1X β1 is biased downward if Y=β0+β1X or Y=β0+β1X (+) (+) Z (‒) (‒) Z (+) (‒) Z (‒) (+) Z

  7. When a coefficient suffers from the `omitted bias’ problem, the coefficient does not show the causal effects. • There are many other situations where a coefficient can be biased. • Many econometric techniques focus on eliminating these biases (in order to estimate causal effects).

  8. 1. Panel DataIntroduction • Panel Data is a data set that contains repeated observations over time. • Panel data is often used by researchers to extract the `causal’ effect of one variable on another variable. • The purpose of this lecture, however, is to familiarize you with this form of data.

  9. Panel Data -Example- • Open “Panel Data Exercise”. • This data set contains production data of several construction companies for the period between 1990 and 1997. Production for each company is measured by the total material moved in tones. Employment is measured by the number of persons employed. Equipment is measured by the sum of engine powers for all the equipment used.

  10. Panel Data -Example- • Notice that for each company, observations are collected for several years: you have repeated observations for the same company over time. This is an example of a panel data. • Suppose you would like to know how many employees you have to hire in order to achieve a certain level of production. • The simplest model would be: (Production)=β0+β1(Employment)+β2(Equipment)

  11. Panel Data -Example- • However, when we use panel data, we consider the “year effects” as well. • “Year effect” refers to the aggregate effect of unobserved factors that affect production of all the companies equally in a particular year. For example, the government may have relaxed the requirements for environmental regulation for the construction industry in a particular year. Then, such a policy would affect the production of all the construction companies equally. Next Slide

  12. Panel Data -Example: Year effect- • If such a change in governmental regulation is not observed by the analystsand if we (as data analysts) do not take such an unobserved factor into consideration, we may mistakenly attribute such year effects to “employment” or “equipment”. This may give an inflated (or deflated) image of the effects of employment or equipment on the production level. Next Slide

  13. Panel Data -Incorporating year effects in the model- • The simplest way to incorporate the “year effects” in the model is to incorporate “year dummy variables” in the model. • Often year dummy variables are called “year dummies”. • The following slides show how to construct year dummy variables.

  14. Panel Data -Constructing “year dummy variables”- • We take the “Panel Data exercise: Data A” as an example. This panel data covers the period between 1990 and 1999. Then for each year, except the first year in the data, you construct the dummy variable in the way described in the box.

  15. Panel Data -Incorporating “year dummy variables” in the model- • After constructing the year dummies, we can incorporate these dummy variables in the model in the following way: (Production)=β0+β1(Employment)+β2(Equipment)+β3Year91+ β4Year92+ β5Year93+ β6Year94+ β7Year95+ β8Year96+ β9Year97+ β10Year98+ β11Year99

  16. Year dummies: exercise • Use “Panel Data Exercise” Data A to construct the year dummy variables.

  17. More exercises • Exercise 1. Use the data you constructed in the previous exercise, estimate the effect of employment and equipment on the production level using the following model. Make sure to incorporate year dummy variables in your model. (Production)=β0+β1(Employment)+β2(Equipment)+β3Year91+ β4Year92+ β5Year93+ β6Year94+ β7Year95+ β8Year96+ β9Year97+ β10Year98+ β11Year99

  18. More exercises • Exercise 2: Using the results of exercise 1 answer the following questions. Exercise 2-1: If a firm hires 600 workers and use the equipment equal to 4000, what would be the expected production of the firm. Assume that the year effect is equal to the year effect of 1998. (For this type of question use all the coefficients, even if some of them are not statistically significant.) Exercise 2-2: Suppose that the firm is using equipment equal to 5000. If the firm would like to achieve 7000 tones of production, how many workers does it have to hire? Assume that the year effect is the same as the year effect of 1998.

  19. Notes about year dummy variables • When you use panel data, construct year dummy variables except the first year. (More precisely speaking, there must be at least one year for which you do not use year dummy.) • If you include a year dummy for all the years, including the first year, you will have a problem called perfect multi-colinearity. If this happens, OLS regression procedure will not work anymore. (Excel will automatically drop one year dummy.)

  20. 2.Policy analysis using panel data • Regression analysis is widely used for policy analysis. • Examples of policy analysis include the analysis of: • Effect of governmental subsidies on small-medium enterprises , on the growth of these enterprises. • Effect of job training on the wage of workers. • Effect of changing the package of a product on the revenue from the product. • Effect of changing the compensation scheme on the productivity of firms.

  21. Example: The effect of changing the compensation scheme on the productivity • We continue using the “Panel Data Exercise” data set. • Some of the construction companies in the data set began to introduce a new compensation scheme called “productivity bonus”. The productivity bonus is tied to the amount of production (i.e., The company pays $0.003 for each tone of material moved, etc). • We would like to see if the productivity bonus scheme has increased the productivity of these companies, and if so by how much.

  22. Example: The effect of changing the compensation scheme on the productivity, contd • The simplest way to evaluate the effect of productivity bonus is to incorporate a dummy variable for productivity bonus. We can construct a dummy variable for productivity bonus in the following way. (Productivity bonus dummy)=1 if productivity bonus exists. =0 if productivity bonus does not exists. Such a dummy variable is often called the “policy dummy variable” since this dummy variable shows if a particular policy (compensation scheme in this example) exists or not.

  23. Example: The effect of changing the compensation scheme on the productivity, contd • Open the data “Panel Data Exercise, Data C”. This data contain the productivity bonus dummy. • Notice that from 1993 some of the companies began to introduce the productivity bonus scheme. At the end of the sample period (year 1999), productivity bonus has become fairly prevalent. (6 out of 13 firms are using the productivity bonus)

  24. Example: The effect of changing the compensation scheme on the productivity • Estimate the effect of the productivity bonus on the production by estimating the following model: (Production)=β0+β1(Employment)+β2(Equipment) +β3(Productivity Bonus Dummy) +β4(Year91) +β5(Year92) +β6(Year93) +β7(Year94) +β8(Year95) +β9(Year96) +β10(Year97) +β11(Year98) +β12(Year99)

  25. Summary for policy analysis using panel data • Construct a policy dummy variable (productivity bonus dummy for our example) • Construct year dummies for all years except the first year. • Estimate a model including the policy dummy variable and year dummies. The coefficient for the policy dummy variable can be interpreted as the effect of the policy.

More Related