1 / 7

IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hoc Task 2 and 4 Launch study

IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hoc Task 2 and 4 Launch study. Teleconference notes, 12 Jan 2005 Jonathan King. Agenda. Attendees Agree last meetings minutes Task 2 no agenda items Launch study, joint task 2 & task 4 Jim Morris - Vortex launch

sfaye
Télécharger la présentation

IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hoc Task 2 and 4 Launch study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 and 4 Launch study Teleconference notes, 12 Jan 2005 Jonathan King IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 & 4: Launch Study

  2. Agenda • Attendees • Agree last meetings minutes • Task 2 • no agenda items • Launch study, joint task 2 & task 4 • Jim Morris - Vortex launch • Discussion of updates to draft launch recommendations table • other business • next meeting date/time IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 & 4: Launch Study

  3. 1) Attendees • Jonathan King, Big Bear Networks • Al Brunsting, Panduit • Petre Popescu, Quake • Lew Aronson, Finisar • Yu Sun, Optium • Ali Ghiasi, Broadcom • Abijhit Shanbag, Scintera • Jim Morris, DOC • John Ewen, JDSU • Piers Dawe, Agilent • Jonathan Ingham, Cambridge • John Jaeger, Big Bear Networks • Adam Fedor, DOC • Paul Kolesar, Systimax • Pete Hallemeier, Optium IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 & 4: Launch Study

  4. 2) Last meetings minutes agreed No issues raised 3) Task 2 - no agenda items IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 & 4: Launch Study

  5. 4) Launch study, joint activity task 2 & 4 - 1 a) Vortex PIE Calculations - Jim Morris Simulations of a Vortex launch into OM3 and OM1 fibres were presented and compared with CL and OSL launches, with and without connectors; PIE-D results agreed to 0.2dB with John Ewen's work on OSL and CL launches into OM3 and OM1 fibres. With connector offsets, the 99% coverage PIE-D values on OM3 were 4.8, 6.7 and 6.1 respectively for CL, OSL and Vortex lens with M=4. On OM1, the 99% coverage PIE-D values were 5.9, 5.8 and 6.1dB respectively for CL, OSL and Vortex lens with M=4. It was noted that these PIE-D values were slightly higher than experimental measurements reported by Lew Aronson on the January 5th call. Vortex lenses with M=9 were also simulated but showed higher attenuation in the fibre and were expected to increase modal noise issues. Discussion and comments following Limiting the number of modes and out of spec 54YY fibres would be expected to decrease PIE-D values by perhaps a couple of tenths of a dB. A question was raised on what additional PIE-D penalty would be acceptable to the group for a 'universal' launch. The sensitivity of the Vortex launch to polarization and dynamic effects was asked about - this had not been studied. Piers Dawe commented that he hoped more experimental data would be available soon. It was noted that a Vortex launch would be expected to meet either of the encircled flux tests appropriate for 13um and 20um OSL patch cords. IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 & 4: Launch Study

  6. 4) Launch study, joint activity task 2 & 4 - 1 b) Discussion of updates to draft launch recommendations table - all There was some discussion on the issue of specifying multiple alternate launches, and how/if this may be introduced into the standard. Some thought this may be confusing; it was noted that this may need careful wording, but that it would be just a 'standardization' of accepted practice for 1Gige links.The group was unresolved. It was agreed that table of launch recommendations rev0.1 should be updated to include revised EF (encircled flux) definitions (as noted by David Cunningham in comments 52, 56, 58, to the 802.3aq draft 1.0 ) for primary launches, and that alternate launches for each fibre type should be added to the table. EF test definitions for Vortex launch were also suggested. A comment was made that EF was a fairly loose launch test, and alternative tests were requested. A suggestion to use Mode Power Distribution or Mode Transfer Function was made by Paul Kolesar.   (MPD is the normalized mode group power as a function of normalized mode group number. MTF is the normalized mode power as a function of normalized mode number.  Paul said that instruments are available that measure EF, MPD, MTF, and took an action item to provide references.   IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 & 4: Launch Study

  7. 4) Other business - no issues raised 5) Next meeting • Wednesday 19th January 2005 9.30am PCT IEEE802.3aq Channel model ad hocTask 2 & 4: Launch Study

More Related