1 / 19

Presented by: Marco Andrade Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

Report on Professional Development for 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 Update Developed for the Providence School Board February 28, 2011. Presented by: Marco Andrade Office of Research, Planning and Accountability Sharon L. Contreras, Chief Academic Officer. 1. Background.

shada
Télécharger la présentation

Presented by: Marco Andrade Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Report on Professional Development for 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 Update Developed for the Providence School BoardFebruary 28, 2011 Presented by: Marco Andrade Office of Research, Planning and Accountability Sharon L. Contreras, Chief Academic Officer 1

  2. Background Office of Research, Planning and Accountability Office of Professional Learning responsible for coordinating the PD offerings in PPSD PD sessions offered after school, Saturdays, and at seasonal institutes throughout the year (summer, optional days) My Learning Plan (MLP), a web-based system to manage PD offerings and teacher accounts to facilitate registration for, and tracking of, PD sessions 2

  3. Background • Review of PD provided in 2009-2010 consisting of: • participant end-of-session evaluations • percentage of math and science teachers who completed their required number of professional development hours. • Review of 2010 Summer Institute and brief update on Optional PD days Office of Research, Planning and Accountability 3

  4. Review of 2009-2010 PD • Crosstabulation completed in Mar2010 – some PD offerings still available • 29.5% general education teachers at the elementary level completed (or had the potential to complete) all required math and science hours • 50-62% of elementary level teachers (outside 3rd and 4th due to Science kits spanning 2 years) were not able to complete all required hours • elementary level teachers had completed an average 83% of required hours Office of Research, Planning and Accountability 4

  5. Review of 2009-2010 PD • 52.8% middle school teachers were not going to be able to meet all required hours in math and 54.8% in science even if they were to participate in all remaining scheduled PD sessions • Middle school math teachers had completed an average of 66.9% of required workshops • High percentage (44.4%) of incorrect workshops taken among math teachers • teachers may have taken incorrect workshops • changed in what was required, either in terms of the required courses or changes in level or subject matter they were going to teach Office of Research, Planning and Accountability 5

  6. Review of 2009-2010 PD • Three in four (74.6%) high school math teachers were not going to complete all their required hours • High school math teachers on average had taken 72.2% of their required courses • 34.9% had taken an incorrect workshop • Two in three high school science teachers (67.3%) did not or were not going to complete all their required hours. Office of Research, Planning and Accountability 6

  7. Review of 2009-2010 PD • End of PD session evaluation form – 13 questions • 12,859 returned, completed session evaluation forms • 86% of respondents were teachers (2,903 did not respond to question 1) • 65% of respondents said the info provided in PD was new to them • 90%+ “agreed” or “strongly agreed” to questions 3-10 7 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  8. Review of 2009-2010 PD Office of Research, Planning and Accountability 8

  9. Review of 2009-2010 PD • I learned at least one new piece of information in this session that could impact my thinking and teaching. • The information provided in this session is relevant to my professional practice. • The information presented at this workshop reflected best practice • The presentation was clear and easy to understand. 9 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  10. Review of 2009-2010 PD • Information was presented in an interesting, engaging manner. • I am likely to implement information from this session in my professional practice. • Students in my building or class would likely benefit if the information from this session were implemented. • I would recommend this session to my colleagues. 10 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  11. Review of 2009-2010 PD • 25% liked the speaker best • 22% liked the general info presented the best • 59% said the part of the session that needed the most improvement was nothing followed by other and hands-on practice at 8% • 38.5% needed practice to best apply learned knowledge and skills followed by 17% nothing and 10% additional training 11 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  12. 2010-2011 PD Update 12 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  13. 2010-2011 PD Update • Currently 1,176 session offerings for the 2010-2011 academic year • 36% of PD offerings available in summer over 5 week period • Most sessions over 7 fall/winter months • Session offerings are added throughout the year as needed; info is subject to change 13 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  14. 2010-2011 PD Update • 7,668 participants completed end-of-session surveys evaluating PD sessions offered during the summer of 2010 (July 19-August 26, 2010). • Majority of respondents (n=5,742; 94.9%) identified themselves as teachers • Over two thirds indicated that most of the info covered was new (n=5,234; 69.0%) • However, about 1 in 3 “disagreed” or “strongly disagreed” that the session provided them with new information • 90%+ “agreed” or “strongly agreed” to questions 3-10 14 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  15. 2010-2011 PD Update Office of Research, Planning and Accountability 15

  16. 2010-2011 PD Update • 31% liked the general info presented the best • 28% liked the speaker best • 49% said the part of the session that needed the most improvement was nothing followed by hands-on practice at 11% • 44% needed practice to best apply learned knowledge and skills followed by 14% nothing and 13% additional training 16 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  17. 2010-2011 PD Update • Includes teacher PD sessions, administrator trainings, and teacher assistant trainings 17 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  18. Conclusions • Ultimate question regarding PD is whether teachers have completed their required hours (as a precursor to correlating how this may translate/contribute into improved classroom instruction and student outcomes) • Majority of general ed math and science teachers across levels, even with the potential to accumulate more hours, would not complete their required PD hours. • While PD sessions are labeled “required” they are in fact not mandatory and thus at the discretion of the teacher to participate 18 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

  19. Conclusions • However in regards to professional practice, in order to appropriately instruct students using the curriculum, employ best practices and use assessment information for decision making, teachers should be using available opportunities to maintain expertise as a matter of ethical and professional responsibility. • The numbers of participating teachers and hours completed, session offerings and enrollment increased for the 2010 Summer Institute • Participant perceptions of the PD sessions show a consistency in responses. Many would like more hands-on practice to apply what is learned. 19 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

More Related