1 / 31

Business Turnarounds

Business Turnarounds. ICTF International Credit Professionals Symposium in Europe Barcelona - 13 th May 2014 David Bryan – Bryan, Mansell & Tilley LLP. Content. Background Bad Debts and Insolvency Turnarounds & consensual restructuring Legal developments in Europe

shanna
Télécharger la présentation

Business Turnarounds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Business Turnarounds ICTF International Credit Professionals Symposium in Europe Barcelona - 13th May 2014 David Bryan – Bryan, Mansell & Tilley LLP

  2. Content Background Bad Debts and Insolvency Turnarounds & consensual restructuring Legal developments in Europe Dealing with turnarounds Conclusions Q&A

  3. The Decline Curve Underperformance Distress Crisis Failure

  4. The Decline Curve Underperformance Distress Crisis Zone of Insolvency Failure Insolvency

  5. Bad Debts • When it all goes wrong! • Customer payments take longer and longer • Eventually unable to pay • Customer files for insolvency • You have a bad debt subject to: • Reclaim of VAT • Credit insurance if covered • May get a return from the insolvency process • Not a good outcome

  6. Insolvency • In principle, similar in most European jurisdictions • Handled by a liquidator, receiver, administrator, insolvency practitioner according to jurisdiction • A statutory process whereby the assets are realisedand distributed to creditors and shareholders in a prescribed order of priority • It is a necessary tool to deal with the failings of capitalism but often produces a poor return for stakeholders

  7. Typical Insolvency Value Break

  8. Why are returns so low? • Process takes too long and is fee intensive • Goodwill of business damaged • Customers lost or potentially lost • Good employees leave / hired by competitors • Assets sold on a fire sale basis • Typically minimal warranties on sale • Potential difficulties with credit etc post sale and general stigma • Unsecured creditors often get a poor return • Process works but there must be a better alternative

  9. The Turnaround Underperformance Distress Crisis Recovery Crisis Management Stabilisation Zone of Insolvency Insolvency

  10. Evolution of turnaround • 1979 US bankruptcy code created “debtor in possession”. • 1980’s / 90’s saw the rise of turnaround managers and the role of the Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) in the US • “Company Doctor” arose as a term to distinguish from those that manage insolvency processes • Influx of American boutiques and banks has seen US terminology gradually take hold

  11. Evolution of turnaround • No legal definition of turnaround or CRO in most jurisdictions • No formal training procedures until now. Recent move to replicate US Certified Turnaround Professional (CTP) with EACTP • Membership organisations exist such as the Turnaround Management Association (TMA) with almost 10,000 members worldwide • Not every business can be turned round. There are pre-requisites for a successful turnaround

  12. Prerequisites for a successful turnaround Available short term liquidity

  13. Prerequisites for a successful turnaround Viable core business Available short term liquidity

  14. Prerequisites for a successful turnaround Credible management team Viable core business Available short term liquidity

  15. Prerequisites for a successful turnaround Fundable business plan Credible management team Viable core business Available short term liquidity

  16. Elements of a turnaround Operational: • Cash flow management and improvement • Cost reduction • Revenue improvement • Product / Service portfolio changes • Closure or sale of non-core businesses • Management changes • Dealing with unions, landlords, pensions etc • What should the business look like?

  17. Elements of a turnaround Operational: • Cash flow management and improvement • Cost reduction • Revenue improvement • Product / Service portfolio changes • Closure or sale of non-core businesses • Management changes • Dealing with unions, landlords, pensions etc • What should the business look like? Financial: • Business valuation & liquidation outcome • Re-financing / new debt • Debt / Equity swaps to reduce debt (existing equity diluted) • Debt forgiveness (“Hair Cuts”) • New equity injection • Compromise agreements with trade creditors (payment plans, possible hair cuts etc) • What capital structure does the business need and can support?

  18. Consensual Financial Restructuring

  19. Consensual Financial Restructuring

  20. Consensual Financial Restructuring

  21. Turnaround vs Insolvency • Business value is enhanced • Process is normally quicker • Operational + Financial turnaround should leave the business able to not just survive but thrive • Avoids a potential “Chapter 22” • The ultimate objective is to preserve value for all stakeholders

  22. Turnaround – Legal Status • Originated with Chapter 11 protection in the USA • For many years no statutory protection in any European jurisdiction • Always a risk that any one creditor could take action and effectively cause the turnaround to collapse • Practitioners became very adept at persuading creditors of the merits of the approach and avoiding problems but often like herding cats • Recently the law has started to change to provide protected pre-insolvency procedures

  23. Changing Laws • Many countries have updated their insolvency laws in the last few years • Some have changed their laws to introduce some form of pre-insolvency process, eg: • France – Mandate ad hoc / Conciliation / Sauveguard • Italy – ConcordataPreventivo / Article 182 bis • Recent EU proposal in March 2014 to formalise pre-insolvency process across Europe

  24. EU Proposal • Notes that 200,000 businesses become insolvent in the EU every year • Notes that “insolvency frameworks in many EU countries currently channel viable enterprises in financial difficulties towards liquidation rather than restructuring” • Suggests that honest entrepreneurs need to be allowed to learn and try again • Recommends member states put in place measures within one year to effect five aims

  25. EU Proposal – Five Aims • Facilitate restructuring at early stage before insolvency without lengthy or costly procedures • Allow debtors to restructure without need to formally open court procedures • Allow businesses to request a temporary stay of up to four months (extendable) to restructure before creditors can launch enforcement proceedings • Facilitate the process for restructuring keeping in mind the interests of debtors and creditors • Reduce negative effects of bankruptcy in particular by discharging debts within three years

  26. EU Proposal • Will it be adopted? How long will it take? • The trend towards turnaround is there, seen in practice and increasingly in law • What does it mean for the credit management industry and you?

  27. Implications for Credit Managers • Recognise it is a negotiation and you get what you negotiate • Trade creditors normally numerous and don’t act together • Typically the 80/20 rule applies • Likely to see trade creditors getting together with a committee run by the larger creditors and the smaller just tagging along • Where substantial amounts at stake committee will appoint advisers and share cost and among all

  28. Implications for Credit Managers • Much more engagement between creditors and the debtor • Understand big picture. Why has this happened? How does the whole restructuring work? Why is it better than insolvency? Who is taking the pain? • Are unsecured creditors being treated equally and fairly? • Can a better deal be negotiated? • Need to understand the detail or have advisers do so on the creditors behalf

  29. Implications for Credit Managers • Are the issues that got the debtor into trouble being addressed? Don’t want a “Chapter 22” • How much headroom is there in the plan going forward? Is there sufficient margin for missing the plan before payments to creditors are at risk? • Can payments be accelerated if performance is better than plan? Make it a condition? • Are adequate safeguards in place to prevent excess bonuses, dividends, capex, management fees etc? • Will credit insurance be available? • Negotiate to get the best deal!

  30. Conclusion • Businesses get into distress more rapidly than management ever expects • If the requirements for a successful turnaround can be met, a live business is worth more than a dead one • Consensual restructurings will become more common and legal changes will likely support that • Trade creditors will need to work together and engage with the debtor • Understand the big picture and the detail, take advice and negotiate the best deal possible

  31. THANK YOU! Questions please

More Related