1 / 17

By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006 Department of Marine and Environmental Systems

An Intercomparison of Surface Observations and High-Resolution Forecasting Model Output for the Lake Okeechobee Region. By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006 Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Florida Institute of Technology 150 W. University Blvd. Melbourne, Florida 32901.

shannon-dominguez
Télécharger la présentation

By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006 Department of Marine and Environmental Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Intercomparison of Surface Observations and High-Resolution Forecasting Model Output for the Lake Okeechobee Region By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006 Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Florida Institute of Technology 150 W. University Blvd. Melbourne, Florida 32901

  2. Introduction • Purpose • Idealized model of a Lake Breeze • Observational and Analytical Methods • Lake Breeze on June 8, 2006: Graphical and Satellite Data • What is the Weather Research and Forecasting Model? • Model Output: Image and Graphical Data • Comparison between Observed and Model Data • Conclusions • Future Considerations

  3. Purpose • Gauge Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model representation of the lake breeze phenomenon with respect to Lake Okeechobee • Evaluate the model performance in terms of forecasting capabilities

  4. Idealized Lake Breeze www.islandnet.com/.../wxdrphotos/lakebrz.gif • Meso-gamma scale turbulent vertical flow (2-20 km) • Occurs in afternoon due to solar heating and flows inland less than characteristic width of lake (Segal, 1997) • Known to extend vertically for several hundred meters (Segal, 1997) • Most events occur in the month of lowest average wind speed and maximum solar heating (Laird, 2001)

  5. Synoptic scale influence on the lake breeze evolution 180 90 270 360 ~150 + easterly large scale (synoptic flow)

  6. Methods and Observations • Weather Station Data: K4JHI • Only Okeechobee Station • Sensible Weather Elements • WRF Model Output • Data Processing • Grads Output and Images K4JHI Palmdale Lake Okeechobee Mesowest Achieve, 2006

  7. Results Sunrise Lake Breeze

  8. Results Continued

  9. Satellite Imagery Sea Breeze Front Lake Breeze Front Lake Okeechobee

  10. What is the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model? T, p, u, v, w,q • Most current regional forecast model • Numerical weather prediction in 4-dimensional space • Spatial resolution from meters to tens of kilometers • Prognostic dynamical model that incorporates actual data with physical parameterizations (e.g., radiation, boundary layer, cloud physics). WRF Configuation Domain size Hz Resolution (4 km), Vertical Resolution? Initial/Boundary Conditions (NAM)

  11. WRF Model Run of June 8, 2006: 5 am - 8 pm 8:00 AM 11:00 AM 2:00 PM 5:00 PM 8:00 PM 5:00 AM 950 Model Winds at 5:00 PM

  12. Time Series Data from WRF Output N E W S www.jimporter.orglakesokeechobeelake.jpg

  13. Comparison of Observations and Model Data sunrise/mixing

  14. Conclusions • Possible lake breeze boundary observed in temperature, winds, and dew point at station K4JHI • Temperature, dew point and relative humidity are not handled well by the WRF model (especially the diurnal temperature cycle) • 4-km resolution model is too inaccurate to use instead of weather observations • Possible problems/issues • Sparse observations • Rounding of data • Observed lake temperature ~ 29 C, model ? • Temporal model output insufficient • Timing/distribution of convection • model parameterizations (land surface, radiation, skin temperature, soil moisture) • Synoptic scale flow appears to be different than observed

  15. Future Considerations • Repeated trials especially during other pressure regimes • 1-km resolution or smaller output • Enhanced monitoring equipment on all lake shores www.nasa.gov/.../71654main1_florida_mosaic_t.jpg

  16. References Laird, N.F. et al. “Lake Michigan Lake Breezes: Climatology, Local Forcing, and Synoptic Environment.” Journal of Applied Meteorology: Vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 409-424. 2001. Segal, M. et al. “Small Lake Daytime Breezes: Some Observational and Conceptual Evaluations.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society: Vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1135-1148. June 1997. Weather Station History: K4JHI in Okeechobee City, FL. Taken from Mesowest database.http://www.met.utah.edu/cgi-bin/droman/meso_base.cgi?stn=AR914 Questions? Christopher Flanary, Natalie Lamberton, Kelli Zargiel

  17. Vertical Wind Profile: Surface to 1.5 km at 5:00 PM 1000 mb 950 mb 900 mb 850 mb

More Related