1 / 24

Immersive Feedback to Improve Student Learning

Immersive Feedback to Improve Student Learning. Presentation for the Midwest Educause-2011. Kelly Wilkinson, Ph.D. – Director of CIRT, Indiana State University Tena B. Crews, Ed.D. – Professor of IIT, University of South Carolina. Assessment. Huba & Freed (2000)

shanonh
Télécharger la présentation

Immersive Feedback to Improve Student Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Immersive Feedback to Improve Student Learning Presentation for the Midwest Educause-2011 Kelly Wilkinson, Ph.D. – Director of CIRT, Indiana State University Tena B. Crews, Ed.D. – Professor of IIT, University of South Carolina

  2. Assessment • Huba & Freed (2000) • “The process of gathering and discussing information from multiple and diverse sources in order to develop a deep understanding of what students know, understand, and can do with their knowledge as a result of their educational experiences; the process culminates when assessment results are used to improve subsequent learning” (p. 8)

  3. assessment • "To assess" derives from the Latin verb "assidere“ • To sit by (originally, as an assistant-judge in the context of taxes) • Hence, in "assessment of learning" • We "sit with the learner“ • That implies • Assessment is something that we do with and for our students rather than to them

  4. So what if we changed the way we give feedback?

  5. Initial research – e-feedbackFeedback a different way • Tied to a larger study about online learning • Looked for a creative way to give online students more faculty contact • Focused on grading and feedback • Used partner grading

  6. What students said

  7. Now What we knew. . .

  8. Typical handwritten assessment So, you like circles, huh? Me too!!!!

  9. Graded Paper w/ Track Changes Cool! Thanks for doing all the work for me!

  10. What if we added . . . • http://www.hrsm.sc.edu/facstaff/tcrews/GradingTech.asp

  11. demographics

  12. Most helpful?

  13. using the tablet, Does the audio/visual. . .

  14. Rubric wanted

  15. Feedback was more immersive - Name Change:Immersive Feedback

  16. What does “Immersive” mean? Generating a three-dimensional image which appears to surround the user. World English Dictionary What does “Feedback” mean? A reaction or response to a particular process or activity World English Dictionary

  17. Immersive Feedback!

  18. Personalize feedback process The goal is to remove the “distance” between the student and the faculty member – in essence making the feedback process more personal and more “real.”

  19. Social Informatics As a factor limiting effective communication Technology As a means to increase and improve communication (Kling, Rosenbaum, Sawyer, 2005) Information and communications technology can be seen as both a benefit and detriment to social interaction and relationships.

  20. Power of Immersive Feedback Traditional written feedback coupled with audio/video feedback • I2S, S2S, and S2I Reinforces

  21. Lessons Learned • Power to personalize the assessment process in online instruction • Efficient method for faculty to bring richness to the assessment process • Particularly effective in providing formative feedback to students • Criterion based rubrics necessary for summative grading

  22. More Lessons Learned • Hard copy reinforces learning through assessment • Both the “what” and the “why” are provided to students • The “why is missing in paper-based grading. • Use of “track changes” may be viable for some students, but faculty must serve in an “editor” type role • Possible to bring students into the grading process

  23. Other Uses • Syllabus Overview • Electronic Journaling • Video Diary • Peer Assessment • Teaching Demo • Oral Report • Electronic “How To” Guide • Internship Reporting • THINK outside the BOX!

  24. Questions, Thoughts, Comments?

More Related