460 likes | 591 Vues
This lecture from ECE 875, taught by Prof. Virginia Ayres at Michigan State University, explores the concepts of electron concentrations in nondegenerate and degenerate semiconductors. Key topics include the effects of temperature, the importance of effective density of states in defining conduction and valence bands, and the application of the "hot" approximation. Students will learn how to calculate electron concentrations using established equations, examine the role of traps, and visualize electron dynamics through kinetic energy considerations.
E N D
ECE 875:Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University ayresv@msu.edu
Lecture 08, 27 Jan 14 • Chp. 01 • Concentrations • Degenerate • Nondegenerate Effect of temperature • Contributed by traps } VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Example:Concentration of conduction band electrons for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n: 3D: Eq’n (14) “hot” approximation of Eq’n (16) Three different variables (NEVER ignore this) VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Answer:Concentration of conduction band electrons for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n: MC NC The effective density of states at the conduction band edge. VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Answer:Concentration of conduction band electrons for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n: Nondegenerate: EC is above EF: Sze eq’n (21) Use Appendix G at 300K for NC and n ≈ ND when fully ionised VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Lecture 07: Would get a similar result for holes: This part is called NV: the effective density of states at the valence band edge. Typically valence bands are symmetric about G: MV = 1 VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Similar result for holes:Concentration of valence band holes for a nondegenerate semiconductor: p: Nondegenerate: EC is above EF: Sze eq’n (23) Use Appendix G at 300K for NV and p ≈ NA when fully ionised VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
HW03: Pr 1.10: Shown: kinetic energies of e- in minimum energy parabolas: KE E > EC. Therefore: generic definition of KE as: KE = E - EC VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
HW03: Pr 1.10: Define: Average Kinetic Energy Single band assumption VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
HW03: Pr 1.10: “hot” approximation of Eq’n (16) 3D: Eq’n (14) Average Kinetic Energy Single band assumption VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
HW03: Pr 1.10: “hot” approximation of Eq’n (16) 3D: Eq’n (14) Average Kinetic Energy Equation 14: Single band definition VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Considerations: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Therefore: Single band assumption: means: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Therefore: Use a Single band assumption in HW03: Pr 1.10: “hot” approximation of Eq’n (16) 3D: Eq’n (14) Start: Average Kinetic Energy Finish: Average Kinetic Energy VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function#Integration_problems Some commonly used gamma functions: n is always a positive whole number VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Because nondegenerate: used the Hot limit: E C E F E i E V - = F(E) VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Consider: as the Hot limit approaches the Cold limit:“within the degenerate limit” E C E F E i E V Use: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Will find: useful universal graph: from n: Dotted: nondegenerate Solid: within the degenerate limit y-axis: Fermi-Dirac integral: good for any semiconductor x-axis: how much energy do e-s need: (EF – EC) versus how much energy can they get: kT VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Concentration of conduction band electrons for a semiconductor within the degenerate limit: n: 3D: Eq’n (14) Three different variables (NEVER ignore this) VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Part of strategy: pull all semiconductor-specific info into NC. To get NC: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Next: put the integrand into one single variable: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Next: put the integrand into one single variable: Therefore have: And have: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Next: put the integrand into one single variable: Change dE: Remember to also change the limits to hbottom and htop: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Now have: Next: write “Factor” in terms of NC: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Write “Factor” in terms of NC: Compare: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Write “Factor” in terms of NC: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
F1/2(hF) No closed form solution but correctly set up for numerical integration VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Note: • hF = (EF - EC)/kT is semiconductor-specific • F1/2(hF) is semiconductor-specific • But: a plot of F1/2(hF) versus hF is universal Could just as easily write this as F1/2(x) versus x VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Recall: on Slide 5 for a nondegenerate semiconductor: n: 3D: Eq’n (14) “hot” approximation of Eq’n (16) F1/2(hF) VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Useful universal graph: Dotted: nondegenerate Solid: within the degenerate limit y-axis: Fermi-Dirac integral: good for any semiconductor x-axis: how much energy do e-s need: (EF – EC) versus how much energy can they get: kT VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Why useful: one reason: Around -1.0 Starts to diverge -0.35: ECE 874 definition of “within the degenerate limit” Shows where hot limit becomes the “within the degenerate limit” EC EF Ei EV VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Why useful: another reason: F(hF)1/2 integral is universal: can read numerical solution value off this graph for any semiconductor Example: p.18 Sze: What is the concentration n for any semiconductor when EF coincides with EC? VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Why useful: another reason: Answer: Degenerate EF = EC => hF = 0 Read off the F1/2(hF) integral value at hF = 0 ≈ 0.6 VM Ayres, ECE875, S14 Appendix G
Example:What is the concentration of conduction band electrons for degenerately doped GaAs at room temperature 300K when EF – EC = +0.9 kT? EF 0.9 kT EC Ei EV VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Answer: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
For degenerately doped semiconductors (Sze: “degenerate semiconductors”): the relative Fermi level is given by the following approximate expressions: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Compare: Sze eq’ns (21) and (23): for nondegenerate: Compare with degenerate: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Lecture 08, 27 Jan 14 • Chp. 01 • Concentrations • Degenerate • Nondegenerate Effect of temperature • Contributed by traps } VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Nondegenerate: will show: this is the Temperature dependence of intrinsic concentrations ni = pi ECE 474 VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Intrinsic: n = pIntrinsic: EF =Ei = Egap/2 Correct definition of intrinsic: Set concentration of e- and holes equal: For nondegenerate: = VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Solve for EF: EF for n = p is given the special name Ei VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Substitute EF = Ei into expression for n and p. n and p when EF = Ei are given name: intrinsic: ni and pi ni = pi = ni = pi: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Substitute EF = Ei into expression for n and p. n and p when EF = Ei are given name: intrinsic: ni and pi ni = pi = ni = pi: VM Ayres, ECE875, S14 Units of 4.9 x 1015 = ? = cm-3 K-3/2
Plot: ni versus T: ni Note: temperature is not very low 1018 106 VM Ayres, ECE875, S14
Dotted line is same relationship for ni as in the previous picture.However: this is doped Si: < liquid N2 1017 When temperature T = high, most electrons in concentration ni come from Si bonds not from dopants 1013 VM Ayres, ECE875, S14