1 / 9

Effect of Increasing Division of Labor on Gender Inequality

Effect of Increasing Division of Labor on Gender Inequality. Shift to production for exchange Surplus held by a few men at the top Lower classes and women dependent Extrahousehold (public) sector dominated by men Household (private) sphere devalued Women labor for family use & reproduction

shayna
Télécharger la présentation

Effect of Increasing Division of Labor on Gender Inequality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effect of Increasing Division of Labor on Gender Inequality • Shift to production for exchange • Surplus held by a few men at the top • Lower classes and women dependent • Extrahousehold (public) sector dominated by men • Household (private) sphere devalued • Women labor for family use & reproduction • Women lose adult status, become male property

  2. Materialist Theory • Marxist theory critiqued and refined • Materialist paradigm still useful and influential • Economic base (infrastructure) • Means of production = land, tools, equipment, factories, etc. used for livelihood • Relations of production = class relations between those who own the means of production (bourgeoisie) and non-owners who labor (proletariat) • Determines superstructure • Other parts of culture, e.g., law, political & social structure, ideology Ideology Social organization Economic subsistence

  3. Materialist Feminist Theory • Eleanor Leacock – Innu of Labrador • Commercial fur trade 1800s • Production for use  production for exchange • Women removed from economic activities • Women lose status, power, autonomy • Sedentarization of nomadic/foraging groups • Women removed from productive roles • Two primary factors in women’s status • Contribution to subsistence • Control of resources, including exchange

  4. Kimmel • Theories that rely on biological inevitability • warfare • male bonding • exchange of women

  5. Kimmel: Correlations of Gender Asymmetry • Need for physical strength • Family size • Childcare • Father & son relationship • Control of fertility • Control over property • Spatial and ritual segregation • Perception of environment • Contribution to food supply • Work segregation • Control of political & ideological resources • Capitalism & industrialization • Demographic imbalance • Circumcision

  6. Rapp – Women and the Origin of the State Historical, political, economic, & kinship systems in relation to subordination of women • Elite women in ranked (pre-state) societies • Increased stratification and hypergamy • Emphasis on women’s purity  control sexuality • Religious change • goddesses  gods • India: Dravidian vs. Aryan • Christian androgyny

  7. Rapp – Women and the Origin of the State • Warfare • Warriors valued  male privilege • Warrior absence  female autonomy • Trade • Labor exploitation • Marriage alliances, polygyny • Bridewealth and class • Women as traders • Penetration into Third World • Colonialism, development • Women lose power, property, autonomy, valued roles

  8. Domestic/Public Divide • Rosaldo and Lamphere: Women, Culture, and Society 1974 • Rosaldo: D/P correlation with women’s status • Domestic/public dichotomy weak  women’s status higher • Chodorow: Reproduction and mothering • Female continuity vs. male separation • -e.g. Herdt: Sambia of New Guinea

  9. Domestic/Public Divide • Critiques of D/P dichotomy • Universal? • Influence of women’s struggles in U.S. • Never absolute – e.g. different uses, times • Generalization vs. real complexities • Different subject positions (class, race, etc.) • Historical development: industrial workplace • Western paradigms of D/P relative power • e.g. Java, India • ‘Patriarchy’

More Related