1 / 26

Biostatistics-Lecture 14 Generalized Additive Models

Biostatistics-Lecture 14 Generalized Additive Models. Ruibin Xi Peking University School of Mathematical Sciences. Generalized Additive models. Gillibrand et al . (2007) studied the bioluminescence-depth relationship. Generalized Additive models.

sheera
Télécharger la présentation

Biostatistics-Lecture 14 Generalized Additive Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Biostatistics-Lecture 14Generalized Additive Models Ruibin Xi Peking University School of Mathematical Sciences

  2. Generalized Additive models • Gillibrand et al. (2007) studied the bioluminescence-depth relationship

  3. Generalized Additive models • Gillibrand et al. (2007) studied the bioluminescence-depth relationship • We may first consider the model

  4. Generalized Additive models • Gillibrand et al. (2007) studied the bioluminescence-depth relationship • We may first consider the model

  5. Generalized Additive models • Gillibrand et al. (2007) studied the bioluminescence-depth relationship • We may first consider the model

  6. Generalized Additive models • LOESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing)-based

  7. Generalized Additive models • LOESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing)-based

  8. Generalized Additive models • LOESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing)-based

  9. Generalized Additive models • LOESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing)-based

  10. Generalized Additive models • LOESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing)-based • Spline-based

  11. Generalized Additive models • LOESS (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing)-based • Spline-based

  12. Generalized Additive models • Suppose that the model is • As discussed before, we may approximate the unknown function f with polynomials • But the problem is this representation is not very flexible

  13. Generalized Additive models

  14. Generalized Additive models • What if the data looks like

  15. Generalized Additive models • One way to overcome this difficulty is to divide the range of the x variable to a few segment and perform regression on each of the segments

  16. Generalized Additive models • One way to overcome this difficulty is to divide the range of the x variable to a few segment and perform regression on each of the segments

  17. Generalized Additive models • One way to overcome this difficulty is to divide the range of the x variable to a few segment and perform regression on each of the segments • The cubic spline ensures the line looks smooth

  18. Generalized Additive models • Cubic spline bases (assuming 0<x<1) • With this bases, the model may be approximated by knots

  19. Generalized Additive models • Cubic spline bases (assuming 0<x<1) • With this bases, the model may be approximated by knots

  20. Generalized Additive models • How to determine the number of knots? • Use model selection methods? • But this is problematic • Instead we may use the penalized regression spline • Rather than minimizing • We could minimize

  21. Generalized Additive models • Because f is linear in the parameters , the penalty can be written as • The first two rows and columns are 0 • The penalized regression spline can be written as

  22. Generalized Additive models • Because f is linear in the parameters , the penalty can be written as • The first two rows and columns are 0 • The penalized regression spline can be written as

  23. Generalized Additive models • How to choose λ? • Ordinary cross-validation (OCV) • We my try to minimize • Instead, we may minimize

  24. Generalized Additive models • It is inefficient to use the OCV by leaving out one datum at a time • But, it can be shown that • Generalized cross-validation (GCV)

  25. Generalized Additive models • It is inefficient to use the OCV by leaving out one datum at a time • But, it can be shown that • Generalized cross-validation (GCV)

  26. Generalized Additive models • Additive models with multiple explanatory variables • We may also consider the model like

More Related