1 / 42

Lecture 4-Neuroanatomy Walter Schneider

Lecture 4-Neuroanatomy Walter Schneider When we talk about the brain we need to be able to identify and communicate clearly on what part of the brain we are discussing (slides contributed by Julie Fiez (U. Pittsburgh) & Rainer Goebel U. Maastricht, Henk Jansma (Brain Innovation).

sherri
Télécharger la présentation

Lecture 4-Neuroanatomy Walter Schneider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 4-Neuroanatomy Walter Schneider When we talk about the brain we need to be able to identify and communicate clearly on what part of the brain we are discussing (slides contributed by Julie Fiez (U. Pittsburgh) & Rainer Goebel U. Maastricht, Henk Jansma (Brain Innovation)

  2. Here are a bunch of different brains. What do you notice?

  3. How was each slice made? What major distinctions can you see? What do you think that they represent?

  4. What happens if we “zoom” in on the grey matter? How can we visualize the structure more clearly? What features can we observe?

  5. Is every piece of the cortex the same? How might different pieces of the brain be different?

  6. What did Joseph Gall (1758-1828) have right and wrong? How should this make today’s cognitive neuroscientists careful about what they say.

  7. Brain Stretching and RotatingSpatial normalization – why? Single subject level:  Integrating the results of multiple recording sessions of the same subject -> increased statistical power Multiple subject level:  Comparing results across different subjects, summarizing results at the group level  Attempt to generalize statistical analysis to the investigated group (fixed effects analysis) or to the population level (random effects). Statistics „runs“ over voxels of different subjects.  Running statistics over subjects is statistically effective only if spatial correspondence between brain areas has been established.

  8. Example of Talairach based Alignment

  9. Spatial mapping: approaches Spatial transformation of brains in Talairach spacePro:Widespread acceptanceCons:Rather crude alignment; requires spatial smoothing, which introduces, however, severe problems like blurring of functionally distinct areas and the suppression of significant small areas Region of Interest (ROI)-based alignment: Identification of functional areas by premapping experiments (e.g., FFA, PPA, V1,V2)Pro:Optimal statistical analysis possibleCons:Not easily applicapple in complex cognitive tasks, focuses on „known“ areas, not automatic

  10. Talairach reference system • Talairach transformation uses 8 anatomical landmarks of a human brain for spatial normalization • Anterior Commissure AC • Posterior Commissure PC • Front AP • Back PP • Top SP • Bottom IP • Left • Right

  11. Defining 8 Anatomical Landmarks • anterior commissure AC • posterior commissure PC • anterior point AP • posterior point PP • superior point SP • inferior point IP • right point RP • left point LP

  12. Identifying Anterior and Posterior Commissure • This is a reasonably easy to find location viable on anatomical scans providing a 0,0,0 mark for translation within the head Z Z X Y Y X

  13. Anterior & Posterior Commissure

  14. Axial View Anterior & Posterior Commissure

  15. Anterior Posterior CommissureAxial View DV 2.6 DV 0.0

  16. Flowchart for Talairach transformation Talairach step 1 Talairach step 2 ACPC- rotation Borders of cerebrum

  17. Cortex Landmarking Analogy identifying Pittsburgh as North America, Pennsylvania, Allegany County, Latitude: 40° 25.53' N Longitude: 79° 58.062' W, on the intersection of the Ohio, Monongahela and Allegany rivers, Intersection of I279 & I376, Old steel production center • What kind of labels/landmarking are useful? • How difficult are they to achieve reliably? • How would the be used by different scientific communities

  18. Cortex Landmarking • Lobes – general areas • Talairach – X,Y, Z location • Gyri + Sulci – surface features • Brodmann – anatomical numbering of areas • Area numbering – based on multiple anatomical and or functional metrics (e.g., in vision V1, V2, V3, V3A, V4, TEO, TE MT)

  19. Notes on Learning Anatomy • BrainTutor • Human Brain Coloring Book • Digital Atlas • Physical Models • Talairach Atlas • Other Atlases • NMI brain

  20. Damasio Labeling of areas

  21. Cortical Areas Brain Tutor – Goebel Damasio

  22. Brodmann Area Maps

  23. Brodmann Areas with BrainTutor Brain Tutor – Goebel Damasio

  24. BrainTutor Learning Anatomy V 2.0 V 1.0

  25. Orthographic Views

  26. Sliced Rendered Views

  27. Identify Gyrus and Sulcus 3D

  28. Colored Gyrus in Orthographic View

  29. Relating Talairach to Gyrus

  30. Homework Identifying Areas

  31. Homework Digital Coloring of Brain Example overlay on postcentral gyrus Example overlay on postcentral gyrus

  32. Digital Anatomist http://www9.biostr.washington.edu/da.html

  33. A Range of Displays

  34. Labeled Wet Brain

  35. Outlined Sections

  36. Outlined and labeled

  37. Labeled locations

  38. Digital Anatomist Cross Check http://www9.biostr.washington.edu/cgi-bin/DA/imageform

  39. Talairach Daemon Cross Check http://ric.uthscsa.edu/td_applet/

  40. Example of Brain Atlases Talairach MNI Montreal Neuro. Inst. Structural Image http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/cgi/icbm_view/

  41. Summary • It is important to accurately communicate and encode locations in the brain. • There are multiple coding schemes (Talairach, Brodmann, Gyri + Sulci, ROI based (e.g., V1, FFA). • You need to be able to understand all these methods. • There are good tools available to idenify structures (particularly BrainTutor and Digital Anatomist). • Note labeling takes some time to develop skill and there are areas of ambiguity.

More Related