1 / 23

Exercise 7

Exercise 7. No.1. (Worse) Integration of quality loss for responses is made with the proposed method through the application of Taguchi's SN ratios. (Better) The proposed method integrates quality loss for responses by applying Taguchi's SN ratios. No.2.

sherylclark
Télécharger la présentation

Exercise 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Exercise 7

  2. No.1 • (Worse) Integration of quality loss for responses is made with the proposed method through the application of Taguchi's SN ratios. • (Better) The proposed method integrates quality loss for responses by applying Taguchi's SN ratios.

  3. No.2 • (Worse)The variability is reduced when the scale of the quality loss is normalized. • (Better) Normalizing the scale of the quality loss reduces the variability.

  4. No.3 • (Worse) Determination of the optimal factor/level combination is made in the following procedure. • (Better) The following procedure determines the optimal factor/level combination.

  5. No.4 • (Worse) There is no significant effect on MRSN by any factor. • (Better) No factor significantly affects MRSN.

  6. No.5 • (Worse) Guidelines in which the optimal adjustment factors in a multi-response problem are determined are presented in the above section. • (Better) The above section presents guidelines for determining the optimal adjustment factors in a multi-response problem.

  7. No.6 • (Worse) Necessary trade-offs should be made when choosing suitable adjustment factors. • (Better) Engineers should make necessary trade-offs when choosing suitable adjustment factors.

  8. No.7 • (Worse) The task in which the optimal adjustment factors are determined becomes more complicated when multiple characteristics exist. • (Better) Multiple characteristics complicate the task of determining the optimal adjustment factors.

  9. No.8 • (Worse) That an adjustment factor must be found is of heavy emphasis in the conventional scheme. • (Better) The conventional scheme heavily emphasizes finding an adjustment factor.

  10. [Note 2.15] • Depending on the sentence‘s context, obtaining, deriving, attaining, locatingand identifyingcan be used as alternatives to findingwhen the Chinese meaning is 尋找.

  11. No.9 • (Worse) There is only a slight effect on MRSN by Factor D, but a significant effect on the average of DT -response. • (Better) Although slightly affecting MRSN, Factor D significantly affects the average of DT -response.

  12. No.10 • (Worse) Six controllable factors were identified in their study. • (Better) Their study identified six controllable factors.

  13. No.11 • (Worse) Improvement in thickness uniformity is made with the optimization procedure proposed herein. • (Better)The optimization procedure proposed herein improves the thickness uniformity.

  14. [Note 2.16] • To increase word variety in a sentence, enhances, upgrades, and elevatescan be used instead of always saying improveswhen the Chinese meaning is改善.

  15. No.12 • (Worse)Computation of the quality loss, determination of the multi-response signal to noise ratio, and verfication of the experimental results are achieved by the procedure. • (Better)The procedure computes the quality loss, determines the multi-response signal to noise ratio, and verifies the experimental results.

  16. No.13 • (Worse) Easy adjustment of the importance of each response can be made by the proposed procedure. • (Better) The proposed procedure can easily adjust the importance of each response.

  17. [Note 2.17] • Depending on the sentence‘s context, adjust, alter, modify, and varycan be used as alternatives to change when the Chinese meaning is 改變 .

  18. No.14 • (Worse) Conventional approaches for analysis of censored data are often difficult to be comprehended by practitioners. • (Better) Practitioners often have difficulty in comprehending conventional approaches for analyzing censored data.

  19. [Note 2.18] • Depending on the sentence‘s context, comprehend, perceive, and understandcan be used as alternatives to realizewhen the Chinese meaning is瞭解 . • Similarly, depending on the sentence‘s context, elucidateand clarifycan be used as alternatives to make clearwhen the Chinese meaning is弄清楚 .

  20. No.15 • (Worse)Feasible factor/level settings are usually determined by engineers so that product quality can be enhanced. • (Better) Engineers usually determine feasible factor/level settings to enhance product quality.

  21. No.16 • (Worse) Analysis of the variables is impossible by the current system. • (Better) The current system can not analyze the variables.

  22. No.17 • (Worse)Announcement of the deadline is required by the organizing committee so that sufficient time to prepare the materials is allowed. • (Better)The organizing committee must announce the deadline to allow sufficient time to prepare the materials.

  23. No.18 • (Worse)Fluctuation in the speed can be performed by the experimenter so that accurate calibration of the machine is ensured. • (Better)The experimenter can fluctuate the speed to calibrate the machine accurately.

More Related