html5-img
1 / 28

Solving the B  K  Puzzle

Third International Conference on Flavor Physics October 3- 8, 2005. Solving the B  K  Puzzle. Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica. Based upon following works: PRD 69 , 034001 (2004) [hep-ph/0307395]; PLB 580, 186 (2004) [hep-ph/0310073];

shino
Télécharger la présentation

Solving the B  K  Puzzle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Third International Conference on Flavor Physics October 3- 8, 2005 Solving the B K  Puzzle Cheng-Wei Chiang National Central University & Academia Sinica Based upon following works: PRD 69, 034001 (2004) [hep-ph/0307395]; PLB 580, 186(2004) [hep-ph/0310073]; PRD 70, 034020 (2004) [hep-ph/0404073]; PLB 598, 218 (2004) [hep-ph/0406126]; hep-ph/0502183.

  2. Outline - • The problem • Large color-suppressed amplitude solution • Large electroweak penguin solution --- FCNC Z0 boson • The  K and K* modes • Summary and outlook Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  3. Flavor Amplitudes of Kp Modes - • The amplitudes of the four K  modes can be decomposed according to the flavor flow topology as follows (ignoring smaller amplitudes): Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  4. Kp Puzzle – Phase I - • Two ratios of the BR’s of K  modes (charged and neutral): • To the leading order, Rc and Rn should be the same in the SM; corrections should be ~ O([(C0 + P0EW) / P 0] 2) ~ O( 2). 2.4s  1.9s 1.5 Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  5. Kp Puzzle – Phase II - • Now the bigger puzzle is in two CPA’s of the K  modes: • In the SM, T0 and C0 have the same weak phase () and a small relative strong phase ACP(K + -) and ACP(K ± 0) are expected to at least have the same sign. establishing direct CPV in B system at 5.7 level 3.6 ! Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  6. Possible Explanations - • For puzzle phase-I only: underestimate of  0 detection efficiency, thus overestimating the BR’s of those corresponding modes. • [Gronau and Rosner, PLB 572, 43 (2003)] • New mechanism in SM: large color-suppressed amplitude C from NLO vertex corrections. [Charng & Li, PRD 71, 014036 (2005); He & McKellar, hep-ph/0410098] • Beyond SM: large electroweak penguin amplitude PEW from new physics. [Yoshikawa, JKPS 45, S479 (2004); Buras et al, PRL 92, 101804 (2004); NPB 697, 133 (2004); Baek, Hamel, London, Datta and Suprun, PRD 71, 057502 (2005); Hou, Nagashima and Soddu, hep-ph/0503072] [see also talks by Baek, Kim, Nagashima, Oh, Yoshikawa and Yu] Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  7. - Large Color-Suppressed Amplitude Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  8. Global Fits to VP and PP Modes - [CWC, Gronau, Luo, Rosner, and Suprun, PRD 69, 034001 (2004); PRD 70, 034020 (2004)] • charmless V P modes, g = 57。~ 69。; charmless P P modes, g = 54。~ 66。; both consistent with constraints from other observables. VP PP Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  9. Updated Global Fits - • charmless V P modes, g ~ 68。; charmless P P modes, g~51。; both still consistent with constraints from other observables. VP PP Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  10. Large C - • The ratio of | C / T | in  2 fits to available data in the  and K  modes ranges from 0.5 to >1. • In a fit to all the available PP data, the ratio is 0.89 (old)  0.77 (new). • They are larger than the naïve expectation (~ 0.25 – 0.3) in SM. • There is a large relative strong phase: arg[C / T ] ~ 90。. • Mainly driven by the mysteriously large BR(00). T exp(i) (T+C) exp(i) P (T+C) exp(-i) Br ¼Br Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  11. NLO Vertex Correction - [Li, Mishima and Sanda, hep-ph/0508041] • | C | or | C0 | is enhanced by a factor of 2 to 3 after including the vertex corrections at NLO. • Strong phase changes a lot. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  12. PQCD Predictions - Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  13. - Large Electroweak Penguin Amplitude Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  14. Z0 Boson - [see also Valencia’s talk] • In most extensions beyond the SM, there are always extra heavy neutral Z 0 gauge bosons. • Properties of the new gauge boson, such as the mass and couplings, are model dependent. • In the gauge eigenbasis, the general Z 0neutral-current Lagrangian is given by • In string models, it is possible to have family-nonuniversal Z 0 couplings to fermion fields due to different constructions for the three families. [Chaudhuri et al, NPB 456, 89 (1995)] Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  15. Z0-Induced FCNC - • After flavor mixing, one obtains FCNC Z0 interactions (non-diagonal) in the fermion mass eigenstates, which may lead to new CP-violating effects: • This may induce flavor-violating Z couplings if there is Z-Z0 mixing. • In view of the fact that the  K data can be explained with a new EW penguin amplitude, we assume that the Z 0 mainly contributes to these operators and obtain • This is possible through an O(10-3) mixing angle between Z and Z 0. • Here we only include the LH coupling for the Z 0-b-s coupling. RH coupling can be included as well, at the price of more free parameters. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  16. Low-Energy Effective Hamiltonian Z0 s s Z0 - [Barger, CWC, Langacker and Lee, PLB 580, 186(2004);598, 218 (2004)] • The effective Hamiltonian of the anti-b→ anti-sq anti-q transitions mediated by the Z ' is • Even though the operator is suppressed by the heavy Z0 mass, they can compete with SM loop processes because of their tree-level nature. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  17. Some Notations - • To study the K  puzzle Buras et al introduce the ratio [Buras et al, PRL 92, 101804 (2004)] • One should note that although c7,8 play a less important role compared to c9,10 within the SM, they can receive contributions from the Z ' such that we cannot neglect them. • In the analysis of Buras et al, it was implicitly assumed that new physics contributes dominantly to the (V – A) ­ (V–A) EW penguins. • As one of their conclusions under this assumption, S KS will be greater thanS KS or even close to unity if one wants to explain the K  anomaly. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  18. Solutions - • Using the same hadronic inputs from  modes as given by Buras et al, we get two sets of solutions: (q,) = (1.61, –84。) and (3.04, 83。)  (0.94, –85。) and (2.37, 85。), whereas they only take the small q solution. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  19. Fitting S KS Too - • Use the following variables to parameterize our model: • We obtain the solutions • It is possible to find solutions (except for (AL)) that account for both the K  and S KS data because the contributions from the O7,8 (from RH couplings at the Z0-q-qbar vertices) and O9,10 operators interfered differently in these two sets of decay modes. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  20. - K* and  K Decays Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  21. K*p and r K Modes - [CWC, hep-ph/0502183] • A distinction between the V P system and the P P system is that there are two types of amplitudes for each topology in the former case, depending upon whether the spectator quark in B ends up in the P or V meson in the final state. • If new physics appears in the P P system, it is likely to show up in the V P system too. • The flavor amplitude decompositions and data are given below: Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  22. Another Method for Constraining  - • With r1≡ |T 0P / P 0P| and r2 ≡ |T 0V / P 0V|, we have: • With particular choices of r1 and r2, one may constrain the weak phase  without knowing the relative strong phase. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  23. Result - • Hopefully, higher statistics in data can improve the bounds. (BR’s are measured at (5~10)% for K p and (10~20)% for K*p and rK. ) r1 = 0.37:g≥ 76or   22 Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  24. Combining the K*+p– and r–K+ Modes - • Instead of treating r1 and r2 independently, one may employ the factorization assumption and get • This number can be compared with the result of 0.7 ± 0.1 obtained from a global fit. [CWC, Gronau, Luo, Rosner and Suprun, PRD 69, 034001 (2004)] • There are four parameters (g, r1, dP, and dV) for the four observables in the above-mentioned equations. Solving them exactly is possible and gives (up to discrete ambiguities of the phases and central values only) g = 69。, r1 = 0.19, dP = 170。, and dV = 128。. • (The above results are obtained by cheating because of the assumption|P 0P| = |P 0V| .) Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  25. Rc and Rn Again - • One can further consider the following observables: • As in the case of the K  system, each pair of Rc and Rn should be equal as long as the color-suppressed and electroweak penguin amplitudes are negligible, as expected in the SM. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  26. Sum Rules - • Note that we have the following two approximate sum rules: which are held only when the terms |C 'V(P) + P 'EW,V(P)|2 + 2 Re[T 0 *P(V) (C 'V(P) + P 'EW,V(P))] are negligible in comparison with the dominant penguin contributions. • The first sum rule is satisfied by current data. • Using the second sum rule, one can deduce from current data that BR(r +K 0) = (8.8 ± 4.1) £ 10-6,consistent with the current upper bounds. • In particular, BR(r +K 0) thus obtained and the measured BR(K* 0p +) are about the same, which is an indication of the equality |P 'P| = |P 'V|. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  27. Summary and Outlook - I - • 1.5 discrepancy between Rc and Rn; 3.6 discrepancy between the CPA’s of K+  and K+0. • Nonuniversal Z’ can induce FCNC and provide new CP-violating sources for low-energy physics. • BR’s and CPA’s of K  and  KS modes can be explained in this model. • Rc and Rn for K*agree, but with a large uncertainty. For the  K mode, a direct experimental comparison is not yet available because there is no data for BR( +K 0). Employing the relation |P 0P| = |P 0V| for the  +K 0 mode, the current data show an approximate agreement between Rc and Rn. • If the puzzles in the K  system is due to new (short-distance) physics, we also expect deviations in the K* and  K systems. This does not seem to be the case according to the current data. • A precise determination of the rates of the  +K 0 decay will be very helpful in checking the Rc-Rn relations and the |P’P|-|P’V| equality. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

  28. Summary and Outlook - II - • A true solution to the puzzle is still in the hand of experimentalists. Solving the B to K pi Puzzle (10/6/2005)

More Related