1 / 19

Claire Sarrat, Joël Noilhan, Pierre Lacarrère, Sylvie Donier et al.

Atmospheric CO 2 modeling at the regional scale: A bottom – up approach applied to the CarboEurope Regional Experiment campaign (CERES). Claire Sarrat, Joël Noilhan, Pierre Lacarrère, Sylvie Donier et al. OUTLINE. I Objectives of CERES and meso scale modeling

shirin
Télécharger la présentation

Claire Sarrat, Joël Noilhan, Pierre Lacarrère, Sylvie Donier et al.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Atmospheric CO2 modeling at the regional scale: A bottom – up approach applied to the CarboEurope Regional Experiment campaign (CERES) Claire Sarrat, Joël Noilhan, Pierre Lacarrère, Sylvie Donier et al.

  2. OUTLINE • I Objectives of CERES and meso scale modeling • II Atmospheric CO2 modeling at the regional scale with Meso-NH • A ‘golden day’ case study: may-27 • A ‘lagrangian experiment’ case study : june-06 • III Intercomparisons of atmospheric meso-scale models

  3. Objectives of the CERES campaign (Dolman et al., BAMS, 2006) I Objectives II Atmospheric CO2 modeling III Intercomparisons of models • Objectives :to establish a regional budget of CO2 : • 10 surface flux sites (energy, water and CO2) on different types of land cover (forest, vineyards, maize, wheat, rapeseed, beans, grassland, bare soil) • Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) data: RS, aircrafts, radar UHF… • CO2 concentrations observations in and above the ABL: Biscarosse, La Cape Sud, Marmande + aircrafts: Piper Aztec, Dimona, Sky Arrow • ‘Flux divergence’ flights • LAI monitoring • Surface and soil properties (Ts, soil water content…) • Experiment in Les Landes, S-W of France: - from may-16 to june-25 2005 - 21 IOP days

  4. Objectives of the modeling activity I Objectives II Atmospheric CO2 modeling III Intercomparisons of models • CO2 regional budgetusing a meteorological meso-scale model Meso-NH and the CERES data: - Test the model ability to simulate the strong surface heterogeneities - Simulate the CO2 transfers at the boundaries: surface – ABL and entrainment at the ABL top • Simulate the complex interactions of CO2, heat and water surface fluxes within a regional model • Simulate correctly the concentrations in the PBL as a necessary condition to retrieve the surface fluxes by inverse modeling (see T. Lauvaux presentation) Surface Meteorological Model LE, H, Rn, W, Ts… Meso-NH ISBA-A-gs CO2 Fluxes Atmospheric [CO2] Anthropogenic Sea Noilhan et al. 89 Calvet et al., 98 Lafore et al., 98

  5. Atmospheric CO2 modelingMeso-NH configuration Altitude (m) 320 km 900 km I Objectives II Atmospheric CO2 modeling III Intercomparisons of models • Nesting 2 ways • Land use: Ecoclimap (Masson et al., 2003) • Initialization and lateral boundaries forcing: ECMWF model • Anthropogenic CO2 emissions from Stuttgart Univ. at 10km resolution Large domain : France Horizontal resolution: 10 km Small domain: CERES domain Horizontal resolution: 2 km

  6. Atmospheric CO2 modeling may–27 Sea breeze effects (Sarrat et al., JGR, 2006) S-E FOREST AREA AGRICUL. AREA AGRICUL. AREA CO2 concentrations Wind direction FOREST AREA S-W S-E I Objectives II Atmospheric CO2 modeling III Intercomparisons of models CO2 concentrations (ppm) may-27 9HUTC CO2 concentrations (ppm) may-27 14HUTC S-W

  7. Atmospheric CO2 modelling may–27 Boundary layer heterogeneity Simulated vertical cross section of the mixing ratio at 14UTC Zi = 1600m Zi = 900m OCEAN FOREST AREA AGRICUL. AREA obs model Forest obs model Crops

  8. Atmospheric CO2 modelling : may–27 A scheme of main processes

  9. Atmospheric CO2 modelling : june-06Lagrangian experiment N-W I Objectives II Atmospheric CO2 modeling III Intercomparisons of models

  10. Atmospheric CO2 modelling : june-06Lagrangian experiment : Budget calculation <CO2> N-W 6 UTC 15 UTC CO2 variation CO2 advection CO2 turb. flux

  11. Conclusion (1) :Atmospheric CO2 modeling with Meso-NH • The CERES database is well adapted to study the CO2 and water budget at the regional scale • The meso-scale dynamical processes such as sea and vegetation breezes have a strong impact on the spatial and temporal variability of CO2 concentrations in the ABL • The atmospheric CO2 budgeting using meso-scale modelling allows to estimate the contribution of advection and turbulent transport processes on the spatio-temporal variation of the regional CO2 concentration

  12. Intercomparison of 5 meteorological models I Objectives II Atmospheric CO2 modeling III Intercomparisons of models • Participation of 5 models: RAMS from Amsterdam Vrije Univ., RAMS from Alterra, RAMS from CEAM, WRF from MPI, Meso-NH from CNRM • Experimental Protocol agreed on: • Domain of simulation at 2km resolution • Initialization and lateral boundaries forcing for meteorological and surface variables with ECMWF model • Land cover by the Ecoclimap database including 61 surface classes, summer crops/winter crops • CO2 anthropogenic emissions at 10 km resolution from Stuttgart Univ. • 2 golden days of the CERES campaign: may-27 and june-06 2005

  13. Intercomparison of 5 meteorological models:Surface fluxes Auradé winter crop Le Bray forest may-27 • Auradé winter crop site is well simulated by all the models RN RN H H • Simulations for Le Bray forest site more difficult for all models • Bsimu[.5, 2] • CO2 flux overestimated due to too high respiration? LE LE SFCO2 SFCO2

  14. Intercomparison of 5 meteorological models:Atmospheric Boundary Layer obs • Most of the models simulate the nocturnal stable ABL and humidity accumulation at low level • At 14H large variation for ABL development : -> 800m RAMS-ALTE ->1500m WRF-MPI day night Z (m) Z (m) Potential temp Potential temp RS june-06 05H FOREST RS june-06 14H FOREST

  15. Intercomparison of 5 meteorological modelsVertical profiles of CO2 concentrations (may-27) Crops afternoon vertical profile morning vertical profile Forest zi zi CO2 concentrations CO2 concentrations • ABL height vs CO2 concentrations: • the CO2 concentrations decrease when the ABL is developing due to vertical mixing and assimilation • the CO2 depletion is higher over the crops area whereas the vertical mixing in lower than over the forest • Generally, the models reproduce the observed trend.

  16. Conclusion (2) :Intercomparison of 5 regional meteorological models • 5 models have simulated two contrasted days of CERES according a similar model configuration • The surface fluxes are easier to simulate over fully developed crops than over the pine forest. The windy june-06 case is better simulated. • The surface CO2 fluxes on the warm may-27 are poorly simulated by most models. • Large discrepancies are observed in the simulation of the ABL development and potential temperature • The CO2 concentrations simulated in the ABL present a correct evolution between the morning and the afternoon profiles.

  17. Atmospheric CO2 modelling Conditions of simulation :  Initialisation of CO2 the day before the simulated day at 18HUTC with a homogeneous vertical profile over the domain of simulations  Meteorological and surface moisture initialisation, lateral boundaries forcing : ECMWF analyses  CO2 anthropogenic emissions from Stuttgart Univ. at 10 km  Land use : Ecoclimap (Masson, 2003, Champeaux et al., 2005) 62 classes of vegetation: Ecoclimap processed from CORINE 2000 and Vegetation NDVI. Anthropogenic emissions interpolated at 2km

  18. Intercomparison of 5 meteorological modelsVertical profiles of CO2 concentrations june-06 Sensitivity to initial conditions

  19. Intercomparison of 5 meteorological modelsAircraft fluxes Forest Crops June-06, 9-11UTC • The observed aircraft fluxes over forest and crops present large horizontal variations • For MNH-CNRM and RAMS-ALTE CO2 fluxes look consistents • For MNH-CNRM the LE fluxes are overestimated over crops because of an overestimation of the LAI

More Related