1 / 18

NH Accountability Task Force: Indicators, Growth, & System

NH Accountability Task Force: Indicators, Growth, & System. November 16, 2009. Indicator Values. 7 committee members (including Emma Rous) provided ratings Used median values to try to summarize value ratings Many people “wanted it all”. Medians and std deviation for all indicator values.

sienna
Télécharger la présentation

NH Accountability Task Force: Indicators, Growth, & System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NH Accountability Task Force: Indicators, Growth, & System November 16, 2009

  2. Indicator Values • 7 committee members (including Emma Rous) provided ratings • Used median values to try to summarize value ratings • Many people “wanted it all”

  3. Medians and std deviation for all indicator values

  4. Medians/SD for “readiness” indicators

  5. Medians/SD for “test-based” indicators

  6. All grades indicators

  7. HS-only indicators

  8. Values for already-collected indicators

  9. Values for indicators not collected

  10. Question #1: Which of these do you REALLY want to collect (1=not important; 5=critically important). You can’t give more than two 5’s!?

  11. Question #2: Which of these do you think we can collect well/validly (1=not well at all; 5=very well/validly)?

  12. Question #3: Which of these already-collected indicators do you REALLY want to include (1=not important; 5=critically important).

  13. Question #4: Which of these already-collected indicators do you think we can collect well/validly (1=not well at all; 5=very well/validly)?

  14. Question #5: Please indicate whether you think we should use, if possible and valid, the indicator for growth (g), status (s), or both (b).

  15. Question #6: Please indicate whether you think , if possible and valid, we should use the indicator for growth (g), status (s), or both (b).

  16. Question 7: So what’s the final list? • Elementary/Middle School? • High School?

  17. Shift to Damian’s presentation • Introduction to student growth percentiles See PowerPoint used on November 30 entitled “Performance Indicators and Growth Percentiles”

  18. The Colorado Reporting System • The public website https://cdeapps.cde.state.co.us/growth_model_public/ • And the private website: https://cdeapps.cde.state.co.us/growth_model_demo/

More Related