1 / 28

Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC

Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC. Ingrid Kraus TU Darmstadt. Outline. Predictions for Pb+Pb Extrapolation of thermal parameters, predictions Experimental observables for T and μ B determination From Pb+Pb to p+p: Model ansatz with correlated clusters

sinead
Télécharger la présentation

Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Statistical Model Predictions for p+p and Pb+Pb Collisions at LHC Ingrid Kraus TU Darmstadt

  2. Outline • Predictions for Pb+Pb • Extrapolation of thermal parameters, predictions • Experimental observables for T and μB determination • From Pb+Pb to p+p: Model ansatz with correlated clusters • Predictions for p+p • Driven by initial or final state? • Summary • in Collaboration with H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, J. Cleymans, S. Wheaton SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  3. Comparison to Experimental Data A.Andonic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, nucl-th/0511071 • Different data selected for fits • Accurancy in T, mB: few MeV SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  4. Thermal Parameters in Pb+Pb On the freeze-out curve: TLHC ≈ TRHIC ≈ 170 MeV T ≤ TC ≈ 170 MeV μB from parametrised freeze-out curve: μB(√(sNN) = 5.5TeV) = 1 MeV Nucl. Phys. A 697 (2002) 902 Grand canonical ensemble for Pb+Pb predictions hep-ph/0511094 SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  5. Predictions for Pb+Pb • Reliable for stable particles • Benchmark for resonances • Errors: T = 170 +/- 5 MeV μB = 1 + 4 MeV - 1 All calculations with THERMUS hep-ph/0407174 SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  6. Analytical check • Off by factor 2! • Particle yield = thermal production + feed-down contributions SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  7. Resonance Decays • Wno resonance contribution • X • 50% from feed-down • both exhibit same T dependence • K decay exceeds thermal at LHC • p • thermal production ≈ constant • resonance contribution dominant • 75% of all p from resonances • p/pprimary ≈ p/pdecay _ _ SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  8. _ T and μB dependence I: h/h ratios • Sensitive on μB • μS opposite trend of μB • determine μB from p/p • weakly dep. on T ☺ _ SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  9. T and μB dependence II: mixed ratios • Controlled by masses • Weakly dep. on μB and T • μB term cancels • larger contributions from resonances at higher T • K/p • not usable for T and mB determination • good test of predictions SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  10. T dependence: ratios with large mass differences • Ratios with larger mass differences are more sensitive T from W / p and/or W / K ☺ SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  11. Modification of the Model • Statistical Model approach: T and μB • Volume for yields → radius R used here • Deviations: strangeness undersaturation factor gS • Fit parameter • Alternative: small clusters (RC) in fireball (R): RC ≤ R • Chemical equilibrium in subvolumes: canonical suppression • RC free parameter R RC SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  12. System size and energy dependence of T and mB • T independent of • System size • Data selection • Energy • μB smaller at RHIC SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  13. System size and energy dependence of the cluster size • p+p • energy dependence? • Pb+Pb • depends on data selection (multi-strange hadrons needed) SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  14. System size and energy dependence of the cluster size • A+A: clusters smaller than fireball • RC not well defined for RC ≥ 2 fm because suppression vanishes SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  15. Canonical Suppression • Particle ratios saturate at RC ≈ 2 - 3 fm • no precise determination for small strangeness suppression SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  16. Extrapolation to LHC • what defines RC in p+p? • initial size of p+p system relevant • RC const • final state of large number of produced hadrons relevant • RC increases with multiplicity SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  17. Prediction for p+p • significant increase of ratios at RC ≈ 1.5 fm • K / p and W / X behave differently • multistrange hadrons suffer stronger suppression • RC will be determined with ALICE data SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  18. Summary • p+p • predictions difficult due to unknown degree of canonical suppression • Cluster radius RC from data • Pb+Pb • predictions for particle ratios with extrapolated parameters T, μB • T, μB determination with p / p and W / K or W / p ratios _ SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  19. _ Resonance Contribution to p/p • Ratio not affected by feeding • net baryon number is conserved SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  20. Resonance Contribution to K and p SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  21. Sensitivity on T Relative variation of R per 1MeV change of T • Thermal • K / p and W / X have same T dependence • sensitivity increases with mass difference • Decay contribution • lighter particles are stronger affected • increasing feed-down with increasing T SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  22. Data Set • Selection: p+ / p- K+ / K- L / L K- / p- L/ K+L / K-p- same for p+p C+C Si+Si Pb+Pb 4p and C+C Si+Si Pb+Pb mid rapidity @ 158 A GeV • Compare different model settings • Equilibrium: parameters T, μB, R • Fit gS : parameters gS, T, μB, R • Fit RC: parameters RC, T, μB, R SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  23. Fit Example • All Fits were performed with THERMUS hep-ph/0407174 • Fits with gS / RC give better description of data SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  24. System size dependence of T and mB • μB decreases at mid-rapidity in small systems …. • …. as expected from increasing antibaryon / baryon ratio SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  25. System size dependence of the cluster size Same trend as K / p SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  26. More SPS and RHIC 200 GeV Data SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  27. Model setting with gS • gS • sensitive on data sample • increase with size • increase with energy SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

  28. Prediction for p+p • similar trend is seen in gS dependence SQM 2006, UCLA, March 26, 2006

More Related