1 / 22

CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study

CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study. David Chao-Kai Chang M.D. M.P.H. Nobel Eye Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan 台灣諾貝爾眼科醫院 張朝凱醫師. Introductions. WFG-LASIK More predictable outcome Less induction of HOA Better night vision

siran
Télécharger la présentation

CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study David Chao-Kai Chang M.D. M.P.H. Nobel Eye Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan 台灣諾貝爾眼科醫院 張朝凱醫師 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  2. Introductions • WFG-LASIK More predictable outcome Less induction of HOA Better night vision • To compare outcomes of LASIK using conventional Visx S4 and CustomeVue wavefront system in Taiwan 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  3. Patients • Recruitment period  July 1 2004 – June 30 2005 • Conventional LASIK (VISX S4) 1360 subjects  2685 eyes • CustomeVue LASIK ( Wavescan Version 3.5) 262 subjects  500 eyes 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  4. Pre-OP Data Conventional CustomeVue (n= 2685) (n=500) Age 27.3y/o 28.5y/o M:F 3.3:6.7 3.8:6.2 MRSE -6.28±1.18 -6.59±1.4 Cyl -0.63± 0.42 -0.75±0.45 WRSE NE -6.32±1.5 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  5. Results • F/U time: at 1day, 1 week, 1、3 、6 、12 month (Since July 1 2004 to June 30 2005) • UCVA • BCVA • MRSE • Wavefront HOA • Contrast Sensitivity 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  6. Part1 UCVA-Conventional 87% of eyes achieved 20/20 UCVA at 12 Month Follow-Up 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  7. Part1 UCVA-CustomeVue 94% of eyes achieved 20/20 UCVA at 12 Month Follow-Up 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  8. Part2 Post-OP UCVA vs Pre-OP BSCVA- Conventional 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  9. Part2 Post-OP UCVA vs Pre-OP BSCVA- CustomeVue 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  10. Part2 Loss BCVA Conventional CustomeVue Loss of ≧ 2 lines BCVA 1 mon 0.62% 0 3 mon 0.55% 0.3% 6 mon 0.37% 0 12 mon 0.35% 0 BCVA≦ 20/25 1 mon 0.57% 0 3 mon 0.48% 0.3% 6 mon 0.36% 0 12 mon 0.35% 0 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  11. Part3 MRSE-Conventional 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  12. Part3 MRSE-CustomeVue 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  13. Part4 Change in HOA (µ) Conventional LASIK CustomeVue LASIK 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  14. Part5 CS-Conventional 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  15. Part5 CS-CustomVue 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  16. Discussion 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  17. Issue 1 – Stability • Better vision obtained UCVA ≧20/16 at 1、3、6、12 months F/U CustomeVue LASIK >Conventional LASIK • Better vision stability 87% of conventional group achieved 20/20 UCVA at 12 months F/U 94% of CustomeVue group achieved 20/20 UCVA at 12 months F/U 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  18. Issue 2 - Safety • In CustomeVue group at 3 month F/U Loss of ≧ 2 lines BCVA: 0.3% BCVA≦ 20/25 : 0.3% • Flap complications were the causes CustomeVue LASIK is safe! • Some flap problem must be overcome! 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  19. Issue 3 - Predicability • MRSE ± 0.50D (12 months) Conventional: CustomeVue = 76% :84% • MRSE ± 1.0 D (12 months) Conventional: CustomeVue = 92% :95% Not significant • Some undercorrection was found by CustomeVue Nomogram building is important! 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  20. Issue 4 - Visual Quality • CustomeVue group had a significant improvement in post-op UCVA compared with pre-op BCVA • CustomeVue group had a significant lower mean increase in HOA than conventaional group • CustomeVue LASIK really has better visual quality • Higher patient satisfaction ! 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  21. Issue 5 - Scopotic Complains • Contrast sensitivity is more stable in CustomeVue group • Less HOA increase in CustomeVue group • CustomeVue LASIK less induce scopotic problems • However, pupil diameter is another important factor ! 2006年中國上海COOC會議

  22. Thanks for your attentions! 2006年中國上海COOC會議

More Related