1 / 7

Lindblom: Science of Muddling Through

Lindblom: Science of Muddling Through. Rational comprehensive method (root) vs. Successive limited comparison (branch) method Which is more appropriate for complex problems?. Rational comprehensive method (Root) Clarification of values/obj prerequisite

siran
Télécharger la présentation

Lindblom: Science of Muddling Through

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lindblom: Science of Muddling Through • Rational comprehensive method (root) vs. Successive limited comparison (branch) method • Which is more appropriate for complex problems?

  2. Rational comprehensive method (Root) Clarification of values/obj prerequisite Means-ends approach: Ends are isolated means identified Goodness test = most appropriate means to end Analysis is comprehensive Heavy reliance on theory Successive limited comparison method (Branch) Selection of values/goals intertwined Means & ends not distinct so means/ends analysis N/A Goodness test = consensus Analysis ltd: neglects important outcomes/ alternatives/values Comparison reduces reliance on theory Two Approaches to Policy Formulation

  3. Intertwining evaluation & analysis • Participants disagree on weight of critical values and even on sub-objectives • Individuals may be unable to rank their own values when the are conflicting • Social objectives may have different value weights in different circumstances • One chooses among values and policies simultaneously • Administrators focus on incremental objectives

  4. Relations between means and ends • Means end relationship is not possible if values are agreed upon and unchanging • Where means and ends are simultaneously chosen, means ends analysis is not possible.

  5. Test of goodness • Root: goodness shown by achieving some specified objective • Branch: agreement on policy is the only test of goodness • remember: objectives themselves have no ultimate validity

  6. Non-comprehensive analysis • Impossible to take all factors into consideration in any non-simple decision • Available information and human capacity are limited • Complex problems/decisions must be simplified • Simplification is achieved through limitation of policy comparisons and alternatives to those differing from the status quo

  7. Succession of Comparisons • “ Policy is not made once and for all; it is made and remade endlessly.” • Successive approximation to a desired objectives where the desired objective itself changes and evolves • “Making policy is at best a rough process.” Policies will only achieve part of what you hope for while creating unintended consequences you would prefer to avoid. • By proceeding through a succession of changes a policy maker avoids serious and lasting mistakes

More Related