1 / 70

To Look or Not to Look: Controversies in Surgical Exploration of Penetrating Neck Trauma

To Look or Not to Look: Controversies in Surgical Exploration of Penetrating Neck Trauma. Anne Conlin, BA&Sc, MD PGY-2, Otolaryngology. Case. 46 year old male working in abattoir Was butchering beef when a live steer broke through gate, knocking him over

siran
Télécharger la présentation

To Look or Not to Look: Controversies in Surgical Exploration of Penetrating Neck Trauma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To Look or Not to Look:Controversies in Surgical Exploration of Penetrating Neck Trauma Anne Conlin, BA&Sc, MD PGY-2, Otolaryngology

  2. Case • 46 year old male working in abattoir • Was butchering beef when a live steer broke through gate, knocking him over • Sustained penetrating trauma to the neck w/ a meat hook

  3. Case • Treated at local ED w/ irrigation and antibiotics; penrose drain placed • Transferred to TOH

  4. Case • Hx • Pt. unsure of mechanism of injury • Complained of pain in the neck • Px • VSS, O2 sats >92% • General: moderate discomfort • Neck: 2 cm wound inferior to R body of mandible, penetrating platysma; pain on palpation; neck otherwise unremarkable

  5. What should we do? • Day call ENT staff: booked patient as P3 • Night call ENT staff: “Why are we here?”

  6. Objectives • Case presentation • Approach to penetrating neck wounds • To look or not to look? The controversy. • Adult population • Pediatric population • Summary

  7. An Approach to Penetrating Neck Trauma

  8. Penetrating Neck Trauma • 5-10% of all trauma admissions • Low overall mortality 0-11% • 30% of cases involve multi-system injury

  9. Approach to Penetrating Neck Trauma • Zone I • Sternal notch to cricoid cartilage • Zone II • Cricoid cartilage to angle of mandible • Zone III • Angle of mandible to base of skull

  10. Zone I • High risk of serious injury • Difficult region for exposure and control • Vital structures • Proximal carotid, vertebral & subclavian a • Major BV of upper mediastinum • Lung apices • Esophagus • Trachea • Thoracic duct

  11. Zone II • Easier access and control • Vital structures: • Carotid sheath: carotid a, jugular v, vagus n • Vertebral a • Esophagus • Trachea • Larynx • Recurrent laryngeal n • Spinal cord

  12. Zone III • Difficult region for exposure & control • Vital structures: • Distal carotid a • Vertebral a • Parotid & other salivary glands • Pharynx • CN IX, X, XI, XII • Spinal cord

  13. Vascular Including: Internal, external & common carotid arteries Vertebral & subclavian arteries Internal & external jugular veins Signs: ABCs External hemorrhage Hematoma Shock Present in: 25% Mortality: 50% Systems at Risk

  14. Pharyngo-esophageal Symptoms & Signs: Dysphagia & odynophagia Hemoptysis & hematemesis Subcutaneous emphysema Air bubbling at wound (w̸ cough) Often difficult to detect Potential consequences: Mediastinitis Sepsis Present in: 5% Systems at Risk

  15. Laryngotracheal Signs: Dyspnea Hoarseness Stridor Subcutaneous emphysema Present in: 10% Mortality: 20% Systems at Risk

  16. Nervous system Cranial nerves: Facial Glossopharyngeal Recurrent laryngeal Accessory Hypoglossal Spinal cord Brachial plexus: Median n – fist Radial n – wrist ext Ulnar n – finger abd MCC n – elbow flex Axillary n – arm abd GCS Uncommon injury Common missed injury Systems at Risk

  17. Mechanism of Injury • Stab wounds • depth & direction difficult to determine on exam • Bullets & projectiles • entry ± exit sites provide little information on amount of tissue injured

  18. Management of Penetrating Neck Trauma:Historical Approach

  19. Classic Approach to Penetrating Neck Wounds • Until 1950s: • Seen almost exclusively by military surgeons • Recommended mandatory exploration for all wounds penetrating the platysma • Rationale: high morbidity & mortality from missed injuries

  20. Controversy Arises • Mandatory surgical exploration was challenged in the 1970s & 1980s • Arteriography available • Health economics • Risk vs. benefit

  21. Annals of Surgery, 1985 • Retrospective study • 257 patients w/ injury penetrating platysma • Group I (1975-1981): mandatory exploration • Group II (1981-1984): selective neck exploration • Indications: hypotension, shock, profuse external bleed, expanding hematoma, dysphagia, neurological deficit, diminished carotid pulse, subQ emphysema, hemoptysis, hemetemesis, spitting blood, respiratory distress

  22. Annals of Surgery, 1985 • Group I: 69% of pt w/ mandatory exploration had no injury • Group II: 22% of pt w/ selective exploration had no injury; none of the observed pt required subsequent exploration • Group II: 2 mortalities in observed pt (MI; spinal cord transection) • Remainder of mortalities in explored patients

  23. The Importance of the Zones • Annals of Surgery study did not subgroup patients by zone of injury • Considerable variation in surgical access and structures at risk by zone of injury

  24. Investigations

  25. World Journal of Surgery, 1997 • Demetriades et al, 1997 • Prospective study, n=223 • Objective: to asses role of clinical examination, angiography, colour flow Doppler

  26. World Journal of Surgery, 1997 • Clinical examination • Emergency surgery: • Severe active bleeding • Refractory shock • Air bubbling at wound • Dyspnea • All other patients underwent investigations according to protocol

  27. World Journal of Surgery

  28. World Journal of Surgery

  29. Emergency Operations • 38 patients (17%) subjected to emergency operation • Only therapeutic in 30 (13.5% of all cases) • 6 had negative exploration • 2 had non-therapeutic surgery: thrombosed vertebral artery • One missed esophageal perforation during exploration • Deaths: 6 total; 5 due to non-neck injuries; unclear if deaths in surgery or non-surgery grp

  30. Results: Vascular Assessment • Angiography • 176 patients • 34 abnormalities (19.3%) • 14 required surgery (8%) • Most common: • vertebral artery occlusion (5%) • Others: • VA tear, ICA occlusion, CCA aneurysm/tear; unnamed vessel thrombosis

  31. Results: Vascular • Angiography + Colour Flow Doppler • 99 patients • w/ angiography as gold standard, CFD had: • Sensitivity = 91.7% • Specificity = 100% • PPV = 100% • NPV = 99% • 100% all-around if only injuries requiring surgery were considered

  32. Angiography complications Femoral hematoma in 5 patients (2.2%) Clinical Exam for Vascular Injury w/ angiography or surgical exploration as gold standard: NPV = 91.7% 100% if only injuries requiring surgery were considered Results: Vascular

  33. 216 patients clinically evaluated 64 had +SSx 10 required surgical repair 0 asymptomatic patients required operation Contrast swallow study 98 patients w/ Sx or proximity injury 2% esophageal injury (+Sx) Esophagoscopy 22 patients, all normal Laryngoscopy 149 patients w/ Sx or proximity injury 25 abnormal (VC dyskinesia, edema, blood) 5 required surgery Results: Aerodigestive Assessment

  34. Discussion • If policy of mandatory surgical exploration: • Non-therapeutic in 86.5% • Angiography has low yield and does not change management • 7.8% of asymptomatic patients had +ve AG • 0% asymptomatic patients had +ve AG finding requiring surgery

  35. Discussion • Esophageal studies • Selective contrast swallow study yield: 2% • Esophagoscopy yield: 0% • Overall • Clinical exam has 100% NPV for vascular and aerodigestive injuries requiring surgery • Clinical exam: 38.1% sensitivity for vascular and aerodigestive injuries requiring surgery • CFD is a reliable and inexpensive alternative to angiography

  36. Discussion • Developed algorithm • If this had been followed: • Total cost would be $30,500 vs. actual cost $444,500 • If CFD done instead of AG: $250,000 savings

  37. The Canadian Experience

  38. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 2001 • Retrospective chart review • 130 consecutive pt. w/ neck wounds penetrating platysma • Surgical exploration vs. observation

  39. CJS 2001 • Location: • Zone I: 15% • Zone II: 81% • Zone III: 4% • Mechanism: • Knife/broken bottle: 73% • GSW: 5%

  40. CJS, 2001 • Management • Observation: 50/130 (38%) • Surgery: 80/130 (62%)

  41. Important Findings • Zone II: • All zone II major vascular injuries were symptomatic on presentation • Neck exploration was negative in all asymptomatic zone II injured patients

  42. Asymptomatic Patients • 76% of all injuries were symptomatic on presentation • Mean hospital stay for asymptomatic patients treated w/ observation & surgical exploration was similar (3.5; 4.3; p=0.575)

  43. Missed Injuries • 1 pharyngeal injury missed in a pt who underwent surgical exploration • 1 pt developed pharyngocutaneous fistula after exploration & repair of lacerated trachea • Follow-up visits • 1 brachial plexus injury • 1 accessory nerve injury

  44. Long-term Disability • All neurologic • 3 pt managed by observation + 6 pt managed by surgery: • Phrenic (1) • Recurrent laryngeal (1) • Accessory (3) • Brachial plexus (4)

  45. Canadian Study Overall • Majority of patients were asymptomatic • Optimal management of asymptomatic Zone II injured patient is not known • Neck exploration does not rule-out the possibility for missed injury • Bottom-line: risk of death from missed esophageal injury, therefore, consider NPO x24 hrs, close observation x48 hrs, & low threshold for rigid esophagoscopy

  46. The Pediatric Experience

  47. Retrospective chart review Age ≤16 N=31 84% in Zone II Abujamra et al, 2003

More Related