1 / 44

ADHD Assessment

ADHD Assessment. Megan Arsenault Merril Dean Cara Freeman. Overview of ADHD. A neurobiological disorder Inattention Hyperactivity Impulsivity At least some symptoms evident before age 7, in at least 2 different environments

skah
Télécharger la présentation

ADHD Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ADHD Assessment Megan Arsenault Merril Dean Cara Freeman

  2. Overview of ADHD • A neurobiological disorder • Inattention • Hyperactivity • Impulsivity • At least some symptoms evident before age 7, in at least 2 different environments • Causes clinically significant impairment in social, academic, or occupational functioning. • Prevalence: • 3%-7% in school-age children

  3. Cognitive Deficits

  4. Social/ Adaptive Functioning

  5. Motivational & Emotional

  6. Motor, Physical, Health

  7. Assessment Considerations • The following must be considered in the assessment process: • Presence of symptoms • Number, type, severity, duration • Verbal, nonverbal, memory, cognitive abilities • Co-occurring disorders • Social competence and adaptive behaviour • Educational and instructional needs

  8. Considerations for Assessment Gender Difference • Gender ratio of diagnosed ADHD is approximately 3:1 (Barkley, 2012) • Inattentive Type has a less pronounced gender ratio • Symptoms more severe in girls; more co-morbid conditions in adolescence in girls (Monuteaux, Mick, Faraone, Biederman, 2009)

  9. Considerations When Assessing Risk Factors • Genetic • Heritability • Environmental • Prenatal exposure to nicotine, alcohol and drugs • Maternal psychosocial stress • Prenatal/postnatal to toxic substances (lead, mercury and pesticides may contribute • Structured environments at home and school may mitigate symptoms • Unstructured or chaotic home/school environments

  10. Considerations When Assessing Resiliency Factors • Structured home/school environment • Reinforcement of self-esteem • Teaching of skills to develop planning, organization • Teaching of problem solving skills: identify problem areas, develop possible solutions, implement and assess • Promote use of ‘islands of competence’ as a way to see they can make contributions • Provide positive feedback and encouragement • (Goldstein, 2012)

  11. Interviews Parent • Interview both if possible • Pre and post natal development • Medical, social and academic history • Medications • Parent perception of frequency, duration, range • Parenting styles including discipline

  12. Interviews Teacher • Frequency, duration, range • Specific examples of when and what • Factors that exacerbate problem behaviors • Academic strengths and weaknesses • Peer relationships • Strategies that have been attempted to increase time on task or decrease behaviors • Information from more than 1 teacher, or different subject teachers

  13. Interviews Child • May be valuable but child may minimize behavior • Often children affected by ADHD are unaware of the significance of their behavior

  14. Observations & Monitoring Classroom • ABC • Intensity, duration and rate • Factors contributing too or sustaining behaviors • 2 or more classrooms/situations, different times of day • Playground/Sports, preferred activities During Testing • Focus/attention • Distractibility • Able to sit still

  15. Types of Observation • Momentary Time Sampling • Record target behavior at 1 set point during time interval • Less likely to over-estimate but may miss large numbers of behaviors out the moment • Best used if no clear onset or end such as paying attention to lesson • Partial Interval • Record behavior if it occurs at any point of the interval you are watching. • May overestimate frequency of behavior • Use for serious negative behaviors such as physical aggression

  16. Types of Observation (cont’d) • Event or Frequency Recording • Behaviors that start and end at readily recognizable times • Record separate incidents in the time interval • Use for single callouts, touching another student, out of seat • Whole Interval • Mark if behavior occurs and takes place through the entire interval • Underestimates as behavior may not persist through whole interval • Useful for tracking academic appropriate behaviors

  17. Types of Observation • Running Record • Record what the child is doing by notes every 15 seconds • Difficult to do but supplies great deal of ‘unnoticed’ behaviors

  18. General classroom observations • Does teacher: • check if students are paying attention; does she cue the class for transitions, important information etc. • Monitor if students understood • Handle disruptions immediately • Have clearly stated expectations for behavior • Ensure consistency of expectations • Ensure there is an appropriate general noise level and behavior conducive to the activity occurring in the classroom

  19. Observations • Always ensure you are comparing to peers • Time frames for intervals should be between 15-30 seconds • Record time, date, subject • Make general classroom observations as well (see next slide) • three most common ‘diagnostic’ indicators in direct observations are: verbalizations/callouts; excessive motor activities and amount of off-task behavior (Goldstien, 2006) • 2-3 different days; minimum 20 minutes per observation; 2-3 different subjects

  20. Rating Scales • Broadband vs. Narrowband • Normative base • Psychometric properties • Parents and teachers are the most reliable informants (Fitzgerald, Bellgrove, Gill, 2007)

  21. Broadband • BASC TRS predictive ability for children who do not meet ADHD criteria (Vaughn, Riccio, Hynd, & Hall, 2010). • TRS, PRS specific subtypes of ADHD (Vaughn, Riccio, Hynd, & Hall, 2010). • Coverage of major dimensions of child psychopathology

  22. Broadband • Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL); Teacher Rating Form (TRF); Youth Self Report (YSR) • Coverage of major dimensions of child psychopathology • 85 languages, multicultural scoring • DSM oriented scales: • Affective Problems; Anxiety Problems; Somatic Problems; Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems; Oppositional Defiant Problems; Conduct Problem

  23. Broadband • Designed to provide a complete overview of child and adolescent concerns and disorders • Extensive evidence base with normative and clinical populations (Fitzgerald, Bellgrove & Gill, 2007) • Recommended for assessment that covers externalizing, internalizing, and academic issues • Useful for initial screening • Limited breadth of coverage across dimensions

  24. Personality Inventory for Children (PIC-2) • Broadband • Cognitive, social, emotional, behavioural concerns • Parent form (no comparison with teacher, child reports) • Narrowing down differential diagnoses • Identification of co-morbidities • Full form (40 min) • Behavioural Summary (15 min) • Can be used for screening or monitoring • Limited criterion related validity (Frick, Barry, & Kamphaus, 2010)

  25. CRS-R • Narrowband • “The Conners 3 is a well-designed instrument with excellent technical properties that promises to be instrumental in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment response of children with ADHD and co-morbid disorders.” (Arffa, in press).

  26. Brown ADD Scales (BADDS) • Narrowband • Measures underlying deficits in executive functioning in ADHD • Differentiating subtypes (McCandless, McClellan, & O’Laughlin, 2007)

  27. BRIEF • Narrowband • Degree of impairment in executive function abilities • Strong relationship with interviews and other parent rating measures of behaviors seen in ADHD • More diagnostic utility in predicting ADHD than performance based measures of ADHD (Toplak, Bucciarelli, Jain, Tannock, 2008).

  28. IQ Tests • “Not sufficiently sensitive to be used exclusively in making a diagnosis of ADHD or in discrimination among various subtypes of ADHD" (Mayes, Calhoun & Crowell, 1998, p. 380). • IQs in the Average range • 7-14 points lower than those of their peers • Difficulty on WMI and PSI • Digit Span, Arithmetic, Coding, and Symbol Search (Mayes, Calhoun, & Crowell, 1998).

  29. Academic Tests • Significant direct effect of inattention on early academic skills. (Thorell, L.B., 2007). • Brief items and short subtests may allow a child with a short attention span to show their strongest abilities • Multiple choice tests may penalize impulsive children but may be more favorable for children who struggle to sustain attention on paper and pencil tasks. • EF deficits of inattention often impact mathematics and language skills • Lower word recognition (Clark, C., Prior, M., & Kinsella, G., 2002).

  30. Continuous Performance Tests • Response patterns on the CPT II provide information that enables the practitioner to better understand the type of deficits that might be present. • For example, some response patterns suggest inattentiveness or impulsivity, while other response patterns may indicate activation/arousal problems or difficulties maintaining vigilance. • Useful for: • Differentiating subtypes of ADHD • Determining strengths and weaknesses • Developing intervention strategies tailored to indivdual • Determining if there has been improvement or deterioration with medication.

  31. Neuropsychological Tests • Basic Attention • Digit Span, Word Span, Number Letter recall, simple cancellation tasks • Complex Attention • Auditory Consonant Trigrams, Digit Span Reversed, Number Letter Sequencing, Paced Serial Addition Test (PASAT) • Inhibition • Stroop Color Word Test, • Attention, Inhibition, Response Set of the NEPSY • Stroop tasks on the DKEFS, • Executive Functions • Task planning: Tower Test of the DKEFS; Route Finding on the NEPSY • Abstract thinking, logical reasoning: 20 Questions, Similarities, Word Reasoning • Hyperactivity • Statue test on the NEPSY

  32. Differential Diagnosis • Mental Retardation • Individuals with High Intelligence • Oppositional Defiance • Individuals with difficulty with goal-directed behaviour • Children from chaotic, disorganized environments or inadequate environments • Stereotypic Movement Disorder

  33. Differential Diagnosis • Other Mental Disorders – Mood Disorders (Bipolar Disorder), Anxiety Disorder, Dissociative Disorders, Personality Disorder, Personality Change due to General Medical Conditions or a Substance Related Disorder

  34. Co-morbidities • Learning Disorders: 25-50% • Oppositional Defiant Disorder: 25-33% • Conduct Disorder: 26% • Depressive Disorder: 18% • Anxiety Disorder: 26% • Also: mood disorders, communication disorders, Tourette’s disorder • May also display: aggressive behaviour, low self-esteem, low tolerance to frustration, lability of moods, temper outbursts (Sattler & Hoge, 2006)

  35. Important Consideration . The symptoms can not occur exclusively during the course of a Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Schizophrenia, or other Psychotic Disorder and are not better accounted for by another mental disorder (e.g., Mood Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Dissociative Disorders, or a Personality Disorder.

  36. A Final Checklist

  37. A Final Checklist

  38. References • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Arlington, VA: Author. • Arffa, S. (in press). Test review of the Conners 3rd Edition™ (Conners 3™). From K. F. Geisinger, R. A. Spies, & J. F. Carlson (Eds.), The eighteenth mental measurements yearbook [Electronic version]. • Barkley, R.A. (2012). Frequently Asked Questions about ADHD. Retrieved from http://russellbarkley.org • Barkley, R.A. & Murphy, K.R. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook. (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Publications. • Clark, C., Prior, M., & Kinsella, G. (2002). The relationship between executive function abilities, adaptive behaviour, and academic achievement in children with externalizing behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43 (6): 785–796. • Fitzgerald, M., Bellgrove, M., & Gill, M. (2007). Handbook of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons. • Frick, P.J., Barry, C.T., & Kamphaus, R.W. (2010). Clinical Assessment of Child and Adolescent Personal and Behavior. New York: Springer.

  39. References • Goldstein, S. & Brooks, R. (2012). Risk, resilience and ADHD: Changing lives of challenged children. Retrieved from http://www.addvisor.com/goldstein_risk_resilience_adhd.htm • Mash, E.J. & Barkley, R.A.(Eds.) (2003). Child psychopathology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. • McCandless, S., McClellan, J.L., & O'Laughlin, L. (2007). The clinical utility of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in the diagnosis of ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 10 (4): 381-389. • Monuteaux, M., Mick E., Faraone, S. & Biederman, J. (2009). The influence of sex on the course and psychiatric correlates of ADHD from childhood to adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 51(3). 233-241.DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02152.x

  40. References • Sattler, J.M. & Hoge, R.D. (2006). Assessment of children: Behavioural, social, and clinical foundations (5th edition). La Mesa, CA: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher. • Thorell, L.B. (2007). Do delay aversion and executive function deficits make distinct contributions to the functional impact of ADHD symptoms? A study of early academic skill deficits Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48 (11): 1061–1070. • Toplak, M. E., Bucciarelli, S.M., Jain, U., & Tannock, R., 2008). Executive functions: Performance-based measures and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in Adolescents with Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 15(1): 53-72. • Vaugh, M.L., Riccio, C.A., Hynd, G.W., & Hall, J. (2010). Diagnosing ADHD (predominately inattentive and combined type subtypes): Discriminant validity of the behavior assessment system for children and the Achenbach parent and teacher rating scales. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26(4): 349-357. • Wright, J. (2002). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A school-based evaluation manual. New York, NY: Syracuse City School District.

More Related