1 / 15

ESH Program Status

ESH Program Status . Steve Hoey NSLS-II ESH Manager Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee Review October 5-6, 2010. Agenda. Overview Progress Safety Incentive Staffing enhancements Prime Contractor coordination Contractor Performance Transition to Operations

skule
Télécharger la présentation

ESH Program Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESH Program Status Steve Hoey NSLS-II ESH Manager Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee Review October 5-6, 2010

  2. Agenda • Overview • Progress • Safety Incentive • Staffing enhancements • Prime Contractor coordination • Contractor Performance • Transition to Operations • Summary/Issues

  3. Overview • Last CFAC review - November 2009 • Were in midst of investigation of injury that occurred on 9-30-09 (re-bar leg break) • 44 corrective actions – all complete • Resulting in significant positive program changes • Contractor performance improved (doing better than industry averages) currently applying for VPP • Construction safety program is performing “Best in Class”

  4. Overview • Workforce up to 250 workers (over 550 processed) • LOB work starting October 2010 additional 150 workers • Work at multiple sites (chilled water, substation) • Environmental issues winding down - risk being retired • Higher risk activities (excavation, steel, concrete) winding down for ring building, less complex for LOB’s • Safety oversight enhanced and now “right sized” for the complexity and size of project

  5. Progress • Many programmatic enhancements & best practices; • Increased use and detail of PHA’s • Increased communications – daily ESH planning mtgs; weekly ESH Mgmt mtgs; monthly ESH group mtgs, schedule and coordination mtgs with ESH • Modified Safety Incentive – workers receive 90% • On site medical provider – NYS trained EMT’s • Occ Med program – 851 compliant • Drug screening, pre-employment and post-incident/cause • Construction safety assessment – contractor and NSLS-II

  6. Progress - Construction Safety Dust Control Man lifts – reduces ladders/scaffolds Heat Stress Monitoring NSLS-II Construction Best Practices Guard rail systems Stair towers – reduces ladders Fall Protection Confined Space Retrieval

  7. Safety Incentive • Safety Incentive modified as result of CFAC recommendation and results of poor first period performance. • Originally a one year period based on rates • 9/30/09 incident and low hours resulted in a 100% loss (500K) • Program was not specific on flow down to workers • New program – effective 4/1/10 • Periods reduced to 2 months • Dollars earned on hours worked • Success based on number injuries (DARTs and TRCs) not rates • Directed 90% goes to workers • Workers have been very responsive to new program

  8. Safety Incentive • Results:

  9. On-Site Safety Coverage • Continuous coverage by NSLS-II Construction Safety Engineers and Torcon Safety Manager • full time concrete sub field safety inspection and Torcon addition of full time field safety inspector • Third NSLS-II CSE added • Daily visits by NSLS-II ES&H Manager (increased since accident) • Weekly visits by Lab Construction Safety Engineer (increased since accident) • Periodic visits by NSLS-II Project Director, Assistant Project Director and other NSLS-II & lab management • Weekly visits by BHSO CSE (Increased since accident) added on-site BHSO CSE 3days/wk • Periodic visits by Liberty Mutual and Zurich Insurance • 2 time/week concrete sub Risk Manager site visits • QA/ESH assessor added 10/4/10

  10. NSLS-II ESH Staffing & Support External Support Construction – F. Kornegay SNS Project Advisory Committees External Oversight Independent Audit & Oversight BHSO Construction C. Seniuk, D. Diem DOE/BHSO Fac Rep P. Kelley Liberty Mutual Insurance Project Review Committees ESH and F&O Directorate Support D. Bauer & R. Lee – Environmental P. Pohlot – Pollution Prevention M. Gaffney – Cryo & Comp Gas J. Durnan & J. Biscardi – Electrical C. Weilandics – Industrial Hygiene T. Conrad – Construction F. Zafonte – Radiological (PS) J. Hynan – Hoisting & Rigging M. Kretschmann – Fire Protection ESH Manager Steven Hoey NSLS Support Keith Klaus -Safety Engineer (.25 MOU) Lori Stiegler - Safety Coordinator (.25 MOU) Bob Chmiel – Safety Officer (.10 MOU) QA/ESH Assessment I. Hildalgo-Olberding Construction Safety Towney Anschutz Ken Krasner Brian Heneveld Training Mary Anne Corwin (.5) MOU Joyce Fortunato (.2 MOU QMO) Authorization Basis Coordinator Nick Gmur (3/5) Radiation Physicist P.K. Job ESH Professional Bob Casey (3/5) Matrixed and MOU personnel are represented by dashed boxes PS= Purchased Service

  11. Prime Contractor Coordination • Challenges: • Separate PC’s for Ring Building & LOB’s (Torcon/EWH) • Will be working in close proximity • Second prime also has ISB and Chilled water • Consistency of implementation of ESH is important • Control of workers moving between sites must be controlled • Implementation of separate safety incentive programs will be a challenge

  12. Prime Contractor Coordination • Controls • Detailed ESH Plan – uses project template consistency between two contractors • Requirements for Occ Med, on site med, drug testing consistent • Pre-construction meetings held to condition contractors • Prime coordination mtgs- ongoing • Lab oversight coordination with project started (covers LOB’s, Chilled Water and ISB) • Daily ESH plan of day meeting to be established for LOB contractor

  13. Project Safety Record (through August 2010)

  14. Transition from Construction to Operations • Overall Transition to Operations Plan in development; • Facility will be phased in four segments (Linac, Booster, SR and full operations) • Beneficial Occupancy Readiness Evaluation process will be used • Specific NSLS-II BORE Plan in place • Officially turns over sections of facility to allow machine installation • Specific Commissioning plans for “equipment” (Linac, Booster, SR) will be developed • Commissioning strategy and phasing agreed to by BHSO (approval authority) • ARR for each phase • Commissioning SAD/ASE and final SAD/ASE

  15. Summary - Issues • Construction safety is a high risk but has been significantly mitigated • Staffing enhanced to provide adequate coverage of upcoming activities • Coordination of multiple Prime contractors – consistency • On track with turn over from construction to operations (BORE) and commissioning detailed planning underway

More Related