1 / 19

Aspects of linguistic competence 5 Sept 11, 2013 – DAY 7

Aspects of linguistic competence 5 Sept 11, 2013 – DAY 7. Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Harry Howard Tulane University. Course organization. The syllabus, these slides and my recordings are available at http://www.tulane.edu/~howard/ LING4110 / .

slone
Télécharger la présentation

Aspects of linguistic competence 5 Sept 11, 2013 – DAY 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Aspects of linguistic competence 5Sept 11, 2013 – DAY 7 Brain & Language LING 4110-4890-5110-7960 NSCI 4110-4891-6110 Harry Howard Tulane University

  2. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Course organization • The syllabus, these slides and my recordings are available at http://www.tulane.edu/~howard/LING4110/. • If you want to learn more about EEG and neurolinguistics, you are welcome to participate in my lab. This is also a good way to get started on an honor's thesis.

  3. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Review • Last time, we discussed: • Thematic roles • Indefiniteness & specificity • (Pronominal) reference • Tense, aspect & modality • We left out the following, which you can read about on your own: • Deixis • Assertion & presupposition

  4. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Aspects of linguistic competence Ingram §2: mainly syntax

  5. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University What are the parts of speech/syntactic categories? • Major/content categories • noun • verb • adjective • adverb • preposition/postposition? • Minor/functional categories • determiner: article, quantifier, demonstrative • pronoun • negation • conjunction: coordinating, subordinating • auxiliary verb? • Interjection

  6. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Words group to together to form phrases • What are the thematic roles of "Mary" and "John" in "Mary kissed John"? • Mary is Agent (and subject) • John is Patient (and direct object) • What goes before, or can be the Agent of, "kissed John"? • Marykissed John. • She kissed John. • That girl kissed John. • The tall girl kissed John. • The girl over there kissed John. • A girl that you don’t know kissed John.

  7. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Restatement of subject data as NP • Answer • A word that is ‘nouny’, or a group of words that contain a noun; it does not matter which one. • We want a way to generalize over all of these possibilities, and the infinite number of alternatives that we can think up. • Let’s do this by calling it a noun phrase or NP. • An NP goes before, or can be the Agent of, "kissed John" • [NPMary] kissed John. • [NP She] kissed John. • [NPThat girl] kissed John. • [NPThe tall girl] kissed John. • [NPThe girl over there] kissed John. • [NPA girl that you don’t know] kissed John.

  8. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Words to phrases 2 • What goes after, or is the Patient of, "John kissed"? • John kissed Mary. • John kissed her. • John kissed that girl. • John kissed the tall girl. • John kissed the girl over there. • John kissed a girl that you don’t know. • Answer • The same ‘nouny’ thing as before. • So let’s also call it a NP.

  9. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Restatement of object data as NP • An NP goes after, or is the Patient of, "John kissed": • John kissed [NPMary]. • John kissed [NP her]. • John kissed [NPthat girl]. • John kissed [NPthe tall girl]. • John kissed [NPthe girl over there]. • John kissed [NPa girl that you don’t know]. • The structure of our sentence now looks like this: • NP kissed NP.

  10. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University NPs get around • English treats NPs as units, in the sense that they can appear in different parts of a sentence: • Which girl kissed John? ~ Which girl did John kiss __? • THAT girl kissed John. ~ THAT girl, John kissed __. • Not even Mary kissed John. ~ Not even Mary did John kiss __. • That girl is who kissed John. ~ That girl is who John kissed __. • Who kissed John is that girl. ~ Who John kissed __ is that girl.

  11. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University More phrases • But it seems to be that ‘kissed NP’ is a unit, too: • Kiss Mary, I would never do. • *Kiss, I would never do Mary. • What John did was kiss Mary. • *What John did Mary was kiss. • What did John do? –– Kiss Mary. • *What did John do Mary? –– Kiss. • John said he would kiss Mary, and he did so. • #John said he would kiss, and he did Mary. • Let’s call this new unit VP, so our sentence looks like this: • NP [VP kissed NP] • By the way, how do you know which ones are bad? • Because you are an expert in the grammar of your native language.

  12. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University A bigger unit • The structure that we just saw covers a whole sentence, and it would be convenient to point this out in some way. • So let us just make up a new unit, say ‘S’ for sentence: • [S NP [VP kissed NP]] • Many people find it hard to keep up with all the labels and brackets, though, so linguists came up with an alternative, the tree structure: S NP VP kissed NP

  13. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Compositionality • Compare these next two sentences: • Mary kicked the mule. • Mary kicked the bucket. • #2 has two readings • Mary applied force to the bucket with her foot. • Mary died. • In the (a) reading, the sentence means what the sum of its words mean; in the (b) reading, it means something special, not predictable from the individual words. • This happens in morphology, too: • the past tense of depart: departed • the past tense of go: *goed, went • We call the (a) readings compositional, while the (b) readings are non-compositional or lexical.

  14. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University More on kicking the bucket • Almost any change, no matter how minor, makes "kick the bucket" lose its non-compositional meaning: • Mary kicked the buckets. • Mary kicked a bucket. • Mary kicked that bucket. • Mary kicked the pail. • Mary kicked the big bucket.

  15. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Aspects of linguistic competence Ingram §2: left-overs

  16. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Linguistic model, Fig. 2.1 p. 37 Discourse model Semantics Sentence level Syntax Sentence prosody Word level Morphology Word prosody Segmental phonology perception Segmental phonology production Acoustic phonetics Feature extraction Articulatory phonetics Speech motor control INPUT

  17. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University Linguistic model, Fig. 2.1 p. 37 Discourse model Semantics [S [NP mεɹi] [VP kɪst] [NP ʤan]] Sentence level [mεɹi] [kɪst] [ʤan] Word level /mεɹikɪstʤan/ Segmental phonology production bilabial - mid - alveolar nasal - front - flap Articulatory phonetics Speech motor control [mεɹikʰɪstʤan]

  18. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University I-language vs E-language • In 1986, Noam Chomsky proposed a distinction between I-Language and E-Language. • I-language mean ‘internal language’ and is the mentally represented linguistic knowledge that a native speaker of a language has, and is therefore a mental object — from this perspective, most of theoretical linguistics is a branch of psychology. • E-Language or ‘external language’ encompasses all other notions of what language is, for example that it is a body of knowledge or behavioral habits shared by a community. Thus, E-language is not itself a coherent concept,and Chomsky argues that such notions of language are not useful in the study of innate linguistic knowledge.

  19. Brain & Language - Harry Howard - Tulane University NEXT TIME Ingram §3: Neuroanatomy of language ☞ Go over questions at end of chapter.

More Related