360 likes | 392 Vues
Attribute Grammars. Programming Language Principles Lecture 17. Prepared by Manuel E. Bermúdez, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Florida. Functional Graphs. Definition: A functional graph is a directed graph in which: Nodes represent functions. Incoming edges are parameters.
E N D
Attribute Grammars Programming Language Principles Lecture 17 Prepared by Manuel E. Bermúdez, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Florida
Functional Graphs • Definition: • A functional graph is a directed graph in which: • Nodes represent functions. • Incoming edges are parameters. • Outgoing edges represent functional values. • Edges represent data transmission among functions.
Example • Here we have three functions: • Constant function 2. • Constant function 3. • Binary function + (addition). • After some delay, the output value is 5. 2 3 + 5
Cycles in Functional Graphs • Can make sense only if the graph can achieve a steady state. • Example: • No steady state is achieved, because the output value keeps incrementing. 1 + ?
Example • A steady state is achieved. • If the "AND" were changed to a "NAND," no steady state. • Undecidable (halting problem) whether a steady state will ever occur. • We will assume that all functional graphs are acyclic. true and ?
Evaluation of Functional Graphs • First insert registers. • Then propagate values along the edges. • Register insertion: • Given edges E1 ... En from node A to nodes B1... Bn, • insert a register R: • one edge from A to R, and n • edges from R to B1 ... Bn.
Example • All registers initialized to some "undefined" value. • Top-most registers have no outgoing edges. B1 B1 gets converted to A B2 A B2 … … Bn Bn
Functional Value Propagation • Two algorithms: • Data Flow Analysis: repeated passes on the graph, evaluating functions whose inputs (registers) are defined. • Lazy Evaluation", performs a depth-first search, backwards on the edges.
Data Flow Algorithm While any top-most register is undefined { for each node N in the graph { if all inputs of N come from defined register then evaluate N; update N's output register } }
Lazy Evaluation for each top-most register R, { push (stack, R) } while stack not empty { current := top (stack); if current = undefined { computable := true; for each R in dependency (current), while computable { if R = undefined { computable := false; push (stack,R); } } if computable { compute_value(current); pop(stack); } } else pop (stack) }
Data Flow and Lazy Evaluation • Data Flow Analysis: • Starts at constants and propagates values forward. • No stack. Algorithm computes ALL values, needed or not.
Data Flow and Lazy Evaluation (cont’d) • Lazy evaluation: • Starts at the target nodes. • Chases dependencies backwards. • Evaluates functions ONLY if they are needed. • More storage expensive (stack), but faster.
Attribute Grammars • Associate constructs in an AST with segments of a functional graph. • It's a context-free grammar: • Each rule augmented with a set of axioms. • Axioms specify graph segments. • As AST is built (bottom-up); segments of the functional graph are "pasted" together.
Attribute Grammars (cont’d) • After completing AST (and graph), evaluate graph (data flow or lazy evaluation). • After graph evaluation, top-most graph register(s) (presumably) contain the output of the translation.
Definition An attribute grammar consists of: • A context-free grammar (structure of the parse tree) • A set of attributes ATT. • Each attribute "decorates" some node in the AST, later becomes a register in the functional graph. • A set of axioms defining relationships among attributes (nodes in the graph).
Example: Binary Numbers • String-to-tree transduction grammar: S → N => . → N . N => . N → N D => cat → D D → 0 => 0 D →1 => 1 • This grammar specifies "concrete" syntax. • Notice left recursion.
Abstract Syntax Tree Grammar • Use < ... > tree notation. S → <. N N> → <. N> N → <cat N D> → D D → 0 → 1 • This grammar (our choice for AG's) specifies "abstract" syntax.
Attributes • Two types: • Synthesized: pass information UP the tree. • Inherited: pass information DOWN the tree. • If tree is traversed recursively with (s1, … sn) ProcessNode(tree T, (i1,…,im)), • minherited attributes are parameters toProcessNode. • nsynthesized attributes are return values of ProcessNode.
Attributes (cont’d) For binary numbers, ATT = {value, length, exp}, where • value: decimal value of the binary number. • length: number of binary digits to the left of the right-most digit in the sub-tree. Used to generate negative exponents (fractional part). • exp: exponent (of 2), to be multiplied by the right-most binary digit in the subtree.
Attributes (cont’d) • Synthesized and inherited attributes specified by two subsets of ATT: • SATT = {value, length} • IATT = {exp} • Note: SATT and IATT are disjoint in this case. Not always.
Attributes Associated with Tree Nodes S: → PowerSet (SATT) I: → PowerSet (IATT) = { 0, 1, cat, . } (tree grammar vocabulary). S(0) = { value, length } S(1) = { value, length } S(cat) = { value, length } S(.) = { value } I(0) = { exp } I(1) = { exp } I(cat) = { exp } I(.) = { }
Example • Input: 10.1. • Convention: • Inherited attributes depicted on the LEFT. • Synthesized attributes depicted on the RIGHT. • Flow of information: top-down on left, bottom-up on right.
Tree Addressing Scheme Given a tree node T, with kids T1, ... Tn, a() denotes attribute "a" at node T, and a(i) denotes attribute "a" at the i’th child of node T (node Ti). • So, • v() is the "value" attribute at T • v(1) is the "value" attribute at T1. • v(2) is the "value" attribute at T2.
Rules for axiom specification. • Consider a production rule A → <r K1 ... Kn>. • Let r1, ..., rn be the roots of subtrees K1, ... , Kn. • Need one axiom per synthesized attribute at r (specify what goes up at root). • Need one axiom per inherited attribute at each kid ri(specify what goes to the kids). • Axioms are of the form a=f(w1, ..., wm), where each wi is either 3.1. inherited at r, 3.2. synthesized from ri, for some i. • Note: this doesn’t prevent cycles.
Attribute Grammar, Binary Numbers • Production rule S → <. N N>. • Need three axioms: • one for v at ".", • one for e at T1, • one for e at T2. • Axioms: value() = value(1) + value(2) exp(1) = 0 exp(2) = - length(2)
Notes • length attribute from kid 1 ignored. • length attribute from kid 2 is negated, sent down to e(2). Only use length to calculate negative exponents (fractional part, second kid). • length will start at 1, at the bottom of the tree. Will be incremented on the way up.
The Complete Attribute Grammar for Binary Numbers S -> <. N N> value() = value(1) + value(2) exp(1) = 0 exp(2) = - length(2) S -> <. N> value() = value(1) # no fraction; # copy value up. exp(1) = 0
The Complete Attribute Grammar for Binary Numbers (cont’d) N → <cat N D> value() = value(1) + value (2) # add two # values. length() = length(1) + 1 # increment # length up left. exp(1) = exp () + 1 # increment # exp down left. exp(2) = exp () # copy exp # down right. N → D # No axioms !
The Complete Attribute Grammar for Binary Numbers (cont’d) D → 0 value() = 0 # zero * 2exp. length() = 1 # initial length. D → 1 value() = 2 ** exp() # compute value. length() = 1 # initial length.
Example • Example, for input 10.1
Generation of Functional Graphs • Optional, see notes
Attribute Grammars Programming Language Principles Lecture 17 Prepared by Manuel E. Bermúdez, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Florida