1 / 2

How Does it Fit Together? RTI At A Glance

This framework outlines a systematic approach for monitoring and diagnosing student performance at grade levels through universal screening and additional diagnostic assessments. It emphasizes the importance of data-driven instruction by utilizing results from ITBS/ITED assessments and engaging in regular grade-level meetings. The process includes identifying instructional needs, grouping students according to skill, and implementing tailored interventions. The aim is to ensure all students receive the necessary support, enhancing their learning outcomes through a structured RTI (Response to Intervention) model.

sona
Télécharger la présentation

How Does it Fit Together? RTI At A Glance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Results Monitoring Addl. Diagnostic Assessment Instruction All Students at a grade level Universal Screening Winter Spring Fall None Continue With Core Instruction Grades Classroom Assessments Yearly ITBS/ITED How Does it Fit Together?RTI At A Glance CORE CYCLE Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 1 C 80-90% S 5-10% I 1-5% Small Group Differentiated By Skill Group Diagnostic 2 times/month Individual Diagnostic Individualized Intensive weekly

  2. Results Monitoring Addl. Diagnostic Assessment Instruction All Students at a grade level Universal Screening Winter Spring Fall None Continue With Core Instruction Grades Classroom Assessments Yearly ITBS/ITED Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 1 C 80-90% S 5-10% I 1-5% Small Group Differentiated By Skill Group Diagnostic 2 times/month Individual Diagnostic Individualized Intensive weekly Grade Level Data Meetings: 1.Discuss briefly additions/changes made to core 2.Share 4-Box data and other diagnostic data results. 3. Group kids with similar instructional needs.(COMPARE TO PRIOR GROUPING- IF AVAILABLE) 4. Complete the group intervention Plan form.(one per group) -Who, what, when, where of instruction -Who, what, when, where of monitoring -Who and when of parent notification NOTE: if any changes are made during Intervention period, document on form. 5. Attach an implementation log and graphs 6. Set date to meet back for check-in (4-6 weeks) Questions/Concerns: District Based Team& IDM Team, Content Specialist Teacher will: 1.Place all non-proficient students into the 4-Boxes 2.Determine if there is a need for additional diagnostic assessment(s) -see grade level sheet 3.Ensure diagnostic assessments are given 4.Bring all data to grade level meetings Questions/Concerns: K-3 Contact Reading Teachers 4-6 Contact _____ Building Teacher with Rdg. Background Teacher will: 1.Calculate what percent of the class is at benchmark 2. If below 80%, determine “core” instructional needs (Beef-up based on data) Questions/Concerns: K-3 Contact _____ 4-6 Contact ____-building teacher w/reading background Teacher will make sure: 1. All students have been given the DIBELS assessment 2. All data has been entered 3. A copy of the class-wide data is printed Questions/concerns: Contact Building Principal

More Related