1 / 28

31 st Annual GIRO Convention

31 st Annual GIRO Convention. 12-15 October 2004 Hotel Europe Killarney, Ireland. CAS Update Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going. October 14, 2004. Agenda. Two Important Task Forces Task Force on ACAS Vote Task Force on Classes of Membership Education Initiatives

sorcha
Télécharger la présentation

31 st Annual GIRO Convention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 31st Annual GIRO Convention 12-15 October 2004 Hotel Europe Killarney, Ireland

  2. CAS UpdateWhere We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going October 14, 2004

  3. Agenda • Two Important Task Forces • Task Force on ACAS Vote • Task Force on Classes of Membership • Education Initiatives • Research Working Parties • Your Input – even if you are not a CAS member

  4. Two Important Task Forces • Task Force on the ACAS Vote • Should Associates have voting rights? • All ACAS? After N Years as an ACAS? • Stand for election to the Board? • Hold officer positions, e.g., Vice President? • Serve on and chair committees? Which ones? • Task Force on Classes of Membership • How many classes should the CAS have? • How should these classes be defined?

  5. Historical Perspective of Associates • Since 1914, two classes of membership. • Associate/Fellow designations have changed over the years: • Initially, based on company responsibilities. • Beginning in 1915, based on exams: • Number and content of exams has varied. • Currently a two exam educational difference. • Currently little distinction between FCAS and ACAS in the ability to perform professional actuarial services in the US.

  6. Task Force on ACAS Vote Why are we considering this issue? • Voting rights have not changed since inception and represent a time when there was a much clearer distinction between Fellows and Associates. • A significant minority (25-30%) of Associates have stopped taking exams. We need to recognize the career Associates. • Lack of true representation for Associates, despite the fact that they pay full dues. • Approval of Mutual Recognition.

  7. Task Force on ACAS Vote • Right to vote should be given to members upon attainment of Fellowship or five years after they are recognized as Associates, whichever comes first. Right to vote should be unrestricted. • All voting members should be allowed to stand for election to the Board of Directors. • Voting Associates may hold all officer positions, with the exception of: • President / President Elect • Vice President - Admissions • Committee membership is to remain restricted to Fellows for Discipline, Education Policy, Syllabus.

  8. Task Force on Classes of Membership Why are we considering this issue? • Current structure reflects a time when there was a much clearer distinction between FCAS and ACAS. • Educational differences do not restrict an ACAS from completing assignments like those done by a FCAS in the US. • Associate designation connotes lesser standing, even though the ACAS is fully qualified to sign statements of actuarial opinion. • Two designations that each mean a fully qualified actuary is confusing. • ACAS not considered qualified outside the US • ACAS does not meet IAA “fully qualified actuary” criteria • Not enough finance – even though far above in other areas • This is an issue for the AAA (single membership class)

  9. Task Force on Classes of Membership The Task Force recommended (May): • Only one class of membership - Fellow. • Certificate of Achievement in Casualty Actuarial Science. • All candidates under the Code of Professional Conduct. • ACAS continue to be awarded for a limited time. • Existing ACAS’s awarded FCAS after completing exams or after five additional years have passed • task force was split • Ideal number of exams for Fellowship is eight; necessary material can be reorganized to fit.

  10. Task Force on Classes of Membership • In May 2004, the Board discussed the various transition options in the Task Force Report. • Options ranged from • Immediately granting FCAS to ACAS and discontinuing ACAS • Completion of additional requirements • Discontinuing ACAS after a transition period and putting the ACAS into run-off. • Under no circumstances would current Associates lose their status as members of the CAS.

  11. Task Force on Classes of Membership • Additional information was requested for the Board’s consideration during the discussion at September Board Meeting. • Survey of the Membership Advisory Panel (MAP). • Feedback from Regional Affiliate Presentations. • Interviews with recruiters on the effects of one class of membership on attracting candidates. • Interviews with actuarial science professors. • Feedback submitted by members.

  12. Task Force on Classes of Membership • Summary of additional feedback received: • Over two-thirds (70%) of the MAP agreed with TF recommendation of one class. • More than three-fourths (77%) disagreed with the TF recommendation to grant all ACAS the FCAS designation without additional requirements. • Most of the feedback has indicated that one class of membership will not create a competitive disadvantage for students. • Actuarial Science professors may disagree with this

  13. Task Force on Classes of Membership Board Motions at September Board Meeting: • That the Board instruct the Executive Council to establish a TF to propose within the next year a set of learning objectives by which FCAS can be attained: • with less material than the current exams, • with fewer than the current 9 exams, • while meeting the requirements of the IAA, • while being consistent with the Centennial Goal. • It is the Board’s sense that this can be accomplished with eight exams (or seven exams with a workshop or seminar).

  14. Task Force on Classes of Membership Board Motions at September Board Meeting: • Inform the CAS membership of the foregoing action, with an indication that the Board supports a move to an eventual single class of credentialed membership, with no more new Associates, concurrent with the movement to a shorter syllabus; and will seek membership reaction to this plan. (It is expected that the then-current Associates will either complete their remaining exams and become Fellows, or remain Associates until they cease their membership in the CAS.)

  15. Membership Involvement • Board is committed to obtaining member input. • Granting voting rights requires an amendment to the Constitution approved by Fellows, however, the Board agreed to postpone further action on the ACAS Vote, pending resolution of the Classes of Membership issue. • Moving to one class of credentialed member may not require a change to the Constitution, but there will be a thorough exchange of ideas.

  16. Changes to Preliminary Education • Current • Prerequisites: Linear Algebra and Statistics • Exam 1: Calculus and Probability (4 hours) • Exam 2: Interest, Economics, Finance (4 hours) • Exam 3: Actuarial Models– NOT JOINT (4 hours) • Exam 4: Actuarial Modeling (including applied stats) (4 hours)

  17. Changes to Preliminary Education Approved March 2004 Board Meeting • Starting Spring 2005 • Prerequisites: Linear Algebra and Calculus • Exam 1: Probability with Calculus (3 hours) • Exam 2: Interest (2 hours) • Exam 3: Actuarial Models & Statistics (4 hours) • Exam 4: Actuarial Modeling (4 hours) • Verification by Educational Experience: Economics, Finance, Applied Stats

  18. Validation by Educational Experience • Option 1: Submit a course syllabus for approval, and then a grade of B- or better in the course. • Micro and Macro Economics • Intermediate Corporate Finance • Regression and Time Series (could be separate courses) • Option 2: Pass an acceptable exam, such as the AP exams for Micro and Macroeconomics, CFA exams, etc. • Option 3: Pass college-level exams offered by the CAS. CAS committed to offering these for at least 2 years. • Option 4: Other experiences. • Courses/seminars designed specifically for VEE credit

  19. Transition • 2000 Syllabus • Exam 1  Exam 1 • Exam 2  Exam 2 + VEE for Econ & Finance • Exam 3  Exam 3 • Exam 4  Exam 4 + VEE for Applied Stats • Pre-2000 Syllabus • Part 3A  VEE for Applied Stats • Part 4A  Exam 2 • Part 4B  Exam 4 • Part 5A  VEE for Economics • Part 5B  VEE for Finance

  20. Why VEE? • Most candidates take Econ and/or Finance • No need to examine topics that require background but not mastery. • But verification is needed to meet international standards. • Test questions for Applied Stats stress memorization rather than application. • Our candidates need to learn how to appropriately apply regression and time series models to real data. • This competency cannot easily be validated in a timed paper-and-pencil exam.

  21. Impact on Travel Time • Actuarial Science majors currently graduate with exams. • Unlikely to have much effect on these candidates. • Other majors who take VEE courses in school benefit from learning experience. • Candidates who did not have VEE courses in school: • Can tackle VEE while studying for Interest exam. • Or between exam “seasons.” • VEE pass rates on first attempt should be very high.

  22. Computer Based Testing • First Administration for Exam 1 Expected August 2005 • Expand to 4-6 computer-based administrations in 2006. • Candidate will receive results immediately (beginning in 2006). • Will expand to other exams if successful.

  23. Modeling Workshop • Education in risk integration techniques is consistent with Centennial Goal. • DFA added to Syllabus in 2000. • DFA taken off Part 8 in 2003 due to inability to test in a paper-and-pencil environment. • Modeling Workshop Task Force established. • Pilot a hands-on workshop experience in late 2004. • Consider adding this as a future FCAS requirement and/or continuing education opportunity.

  24. Research Working Parties • Research task forces charged to produce a research product over a short timeframe. • Should produce more cohesive, accessible material in a consistent format, through the collective, managed nature of the process. • Should help the CAS effectively address long-standing research problems, and harness the research energy of individual researchers. • Have proven to be effective research mechanism for GIRO!

  25. Research Working Parties 2003-04 • Correlations and Dependencies Among All Risk Sources • Executive-Level Decision-Making Using Dynamic Risk Modeling • Elicitation and Elucidation of Risk Preferences • Quantifying Variability in Reserves Estimates

  26. Research Working Parties 2004-05 • Dynamic Risk Modeling Handbook • Public-Access DFA Model • Bornhuetter-Ferguson - Initial Expected Losses • Tail Factors

  27. I welcome your input regarding . . . • ACAS Task Forces • Education Initiatives • CAS Centennial Goal • International Issues • CAS Role Outside Traditional P/C Insurance • Membership • Research and Publications • What’s On Your Mind? • Questions?

  28. Thank You!

More Related