370 likes | 569 Vues
CMOS Analog Integrated Circuits: Models, Analysis, & Design. Dr. John Choma, Jr. Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Southern California Department of Electrical Engineering-Electrophysics University Park; Mail Code: 0271
                
                E N D
CMOS Analog Integrated Circuits: Models, Analysis, & Design Dr. John Choma, Jr. Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Southern California Department of Electrical Engineering-Electrophysics University Park; Mail Code: 0271 Los Angeles, California 90089-0271 213-740-4692 [OFF] 626-915-7503 [HOME] 626-915-0944 [FAX] johnc@almaak.usc.edu (E-MAIL) EE448 MOS Circuit Level Models Fall 2001
Static Model • Cutoff Region • Ohmic (Triode) Region Model • Saturation Region Model • Subthreshold Model • Short Channel Effects In Saturation • Channel Length Modulation • Substrate/Bulk Phenomena • Mobility Degradation • Carrier Velocity Saturation • Small Signal Model In Saturation • Forward Transconductance • Bulk Transconductance • Capacitances • Sample Circuit Analysis (Inverter) • Gain • Bandwidth Lecture Overview 2
L L L d d S G D Silicon Dioxide T D ox   I d V gd I I  g Drain b N+ N+ V X G B Source ds d   W V V gs I bs s    P–Type Substrate S (Concentration = ND cm-3 ) B I = I + I + I s d g b I  0 g I  0, for V < 0 b bs I  I s d V = V – V ds gs g d N–Channel MOSFET 3
L L L d d S G D Silicon Dioxide T ox P+ Drain Source P+ X d W N–Type Substrate (Concentration = ND cm-3 ) B I = I + I + I s d g b D   I I  0 V d g dg I I  g b V G B I  0, for V < 0 sd b sb   V V I  I sg I sb s s d    S V = V – V sd sg d g P–Channel MOSFET 4
V hn V  V V < V – V gs hn ds gs hn  µ n ox K = µ C = n n ox T ox / 3 2 T o µ(T)  µ(To) T V – V – V   I I I 1 gs hn ds d W d d  = K V – V – V = n gs hn ds  R L V V V V ds ds ds ds ds V – V – gs hn 2 • l Cutoff Regime: • Threshold Voltage, Function Of Bulk–Source Voltage • l Ohmic Regime: • (Hundreds Of µmhos/Volt) • l Comments • W/L Is Gate–Channel Aspect Ratio, A Designable Parameter • Temperature Effects (Holes And Electrons): • Resistance For Small Drain–Source Voltage: Characteristic Curves: Cutoff And Ohmic Regimes  and 5
V  V & V  V – V gs hn ds gs hn V V – V dss gs hn K W 2 n I = V dss dss 2 L • l Saturation Regime: • l Comments • Square Law Voltage–Controlled Current Source • Drain Current Shows Negative Temperature Coefficient • Because Of Its Proportionality To Mobility • Differential Current Of Two Matched Devices Is Linear With • Differential Gate–Source Voltage , Provided Common Mode • Gate–Source Voltage Is A Constant Characteristic Curves: Saturated Regime   Drain Saturation Voltage  Drain Saturation Current 6
l Inputs Simple Differential Pair l Response lNote Differential Output Current And Voltage Are Linear With Respect To Differential Input Voltage Without Invoking Small Signal Approximation 6a
2 n V W / ( V – V ) n V T e I = 2 K gs hn T  d n L Characteristic Curves: Subthreshold Regime l Subthreshold Regime: s s s l Comments s Bipolar Type I–V Action Indigenous To Subthreshold Regime s Subthreshold Operation Corresponds To Gate–Channel Interface Potentials Lying Between One And Two Fermi Potentials s Useful Only For Low Speed, Low Power Applications 7
V ds   S D l Depletion l Zero Current l lVoltage Across Oxide lInterface Potential V gs   V  0 c SiO G ds I 2 d 0 < V < V gs hn V  0 bs              Fixed Immobile N+ Drain Source Charges N+ DEPLETION LAYER, V  0 ds V  ox DEPLETION LAYER, V = 0 ds  V P–Type Substrate y V   bs B Cutoff Regime 9
G S D N+ N+ Drain Source P–Type Substrate L G S D V > V gs hn N+ N+ Drain 0  V  V – V Source ds gs hn V > V gd hn  V   D V  dss ds L ' D L P–Type Substrate Metal or Polysilicon Inversion Layer Silicon Dioxide Depletion Channel Inversion: Ohmic Regime 10
G S D V > V N+ gs hn N+ Drain Source 0  V = V – V ds gs hn P–Type Substrate V  V gd hn L G S D V > V gs hn N+ N+ 0  V > V – V Drain ds gs hn Source V < V gd hn  V    V  dss ds L '  L P–Type Substrate Metal or Polysilicon Inversion Layer Silicon Dioxide Depletion Channel Inversion: Saturation Regime 11
G S D N+ N+ Drain Source  V    V  dss ds L ' D L K V – V L W 2 n ds dss I = I = V – V 1 + d dss gs hn |  L 2 L V  V > V ds dss 2 q N A V = L V – V + V  ds dss j  s Channel Length Modulation l Modified Saturation Regime Current L – l Channel Modulation Voltage (Typically Under 20 Volts And As Small As 1/3 Volt For Deep Submicron MOSFETs) 12
K V – V L W 2 n ds dss I = I = V – V 1 + d dss gs hn |  L 2 L V  V > V ds dss 2 q N A V = L V – V + V  ds dss j  s l Modified Saturation Regime Current Channel Length Modulation Parameters L – • l Parameters •  Average Substrate Impurity Concentration •  Dielectric Constant Of Silicon (1.05 pF/cm) •  Electronic Charge Magnitude •  Channel Length Modulation Voltage •  Built In Substrate–Drain/Source Junction Potential • l Note • Large Channel Length Reduces Channel Modulation • Small Substrate Concentration Increases Channel Modulation 13
K V – V W 2 n ds dss I = V – V 1 + d gs hnc 2 L V  V bs V = V + 2 V V – V 1 – – 1  h ho F T 2 V – V F T 2  q N T A s  ox V = = q N   A s 2 C ox ox l Effect On Threshold Voltage Substrate/Bulk Phenomena • (High Hundreds Of µVolts) • (Few Tenths Of Volts) • l Parameters •  Fermi Potential; Renders Channel Surface Intrinsic •  Intrinsic Carrier Concentration In Substrate •  Dielectric Constant Of Silicon Dioxide (345 fF/cm) • l Note • Small Oxide Thickness Reduces Threshold Modulation • Small Substrate Concentration Reduces Threshold Modulation  ox 14
Threshold Correction (volts) Threshold Voltage Modulation Bulk–Source Voltage, Vbs (volts) 15
µ n µ neff V – V gs hnc 1 + V E 6 V (500)(10 T E ox Mobility Degradation Due To Vertical Field • l Electric Field Problems • Thin Oxide Layers Conduce Large Gate -To- Channel Fields • For Even Small -To- Moderate Gate–Source Voltages • These Enhanced Fields Impart Increasing Energies To Carriers, • Thereby Causing More Carrier Collisions And Degraded Mobilities • l Mobility: • l Parameters •  Effective Carrier Mobility In Channel •  Vertical Field Degradation Voltage Parameter • Crude One Dimension Approximation To Two Dimensional Problem • in MKS Units Yields In Volts  (Low Hundreds Of Volts)  ) 16
K = µ C K = µ C n n ox neff neff ox V – V 2 ds dss V – V 1 + gs hnc K V W  n I = d 2 L V – V gs hnc 1 + V E Impact Of Mobility Degradation • l Static Drain Current • l Other Effects • Reduced Bandwidth And Increased Carrier Transit Time • Smaller Current For Given Gate–Source Bias • Reduced Forward Transconductance  17
µ v n sat µ = ne E E + E h c h 1 + E c µ E n h v = µ E ne h E h 1 + E c V – V gs hn E  h L • l Electric Field Problems • Short Channels Conduce Large Drain -To- Source Fields • For Even Small -To- Moderate Drain–Source Voltages • These Enhanced Fields Impart Increasing Energies To Carriers, • Thereby Causing More Carrier Collisions And Degraded Mobilities • At Very Large Horizontal Fields, Carrier Velocities Ultimately • Saturate To A Value Of , Which Is About 0.1 µm/pSEC • Saturation Occurs When Horizontal Field, ,Equals Or Exceeds A • Critical Value, , Which Is About 5 V/µm • l Mobility And Field Mobility Degradation Due To Lateral Field   18
Velocity – Mobility – Field Relationships Carrier Velocity (µm/psec) Normalized Carrier Mobility 0.1 1 0.09 0.9 Carrier Velocity 0.08 0.8 0.07 0.7 0.06 0.6 0.05 0.5 0.04 0.4 Normalized Mobility 0.03 0.3 0.02 0.2 0.01 0.1 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Lateral Electric Field (V/µm) 18a
µ µ µ n n n µ   = ne E V – V V h gs hnc dss 1 + 1 + 1 + E L E L E c c c V – V V gs hnc dss E  = h L L V  Mobility And Lateral Field • l Mobility And Field • l Electric Field Problems • Crude Approximation For Horizontal Field, • Free Carriers Exist Only Over Channel Where Voltage With • Respect To The Source Is At Most • Channel Length, L, Should Be Effective Channel Length, L', • But This Shrinkage Is Already Accounted For By Channel Length • Modulation Voltage Parameter, • Is About 1.75 Volts For L = 0.35 µm 19
K = µ C K = µ C n n ox neff neff ox V – V 2 ds dss (V – V ) 1 + gs hnc K V W  n I = 2 L V – V gs hnc 1 + L E c W C v V – V ox sat ds dss I V – V 1 + d gs hnc 2 V l Volt–Ampere Impact Of High Lateral Field • l Static Drain Current • l Very High Fields • l Comments • Drain Current Scales Approximately With W, As Opposed • To W/L • Drain Current Almost Linear W/R To Gate–Source Voltage  d  20
MOS Large Signal Model  Gate-Drain Capacitance  Gate-Source Capacitance Static Drain Current  Drain-Bulk Capacitance  Source-Bulk Capacitance  Drain Overlap Capacitance  Source Overlap Capacitance  Drain Ohmic Resistance  Source Ohmic Resistance  Bulk Ohmic Resistance  Bulk Spreading Resistance DBD Bulk-Drain Diode  Bulk Spreading Resistance DBS Bulk-Source Diode 21
C + C C = W L C gd old old d ox  Device Capacitances In Saturation  Drain-Bulk Junction Area  Large (Hundreds Of fF)  Source-Bulk Junction Area  Large (Hundreds Of fF)  Zero Bias Depletion Capacitance Density  Moderate (High Tens Of fF)  Small (Tens Of fF) 22
 I W d g 2 K I D mf n dQ L  V | gs Q  I d g =  g mb b mf  V | bs g v g v mf ga mb ba Q / V 2   = b 2 V – V – V G F T bsQ I  I dQ d g o V + V – V  V |  ds dss ds Q B C old Approximate (Long Channel) Small Signal Model   c C C gd db c c c c  g o C C gs sb c c c c c v v   + + ga ba C   ols c S • l Assumptions • All Series Ohmic Resistances Are Negligible • Transistor Operates In Saturation Regime • "Long Channel" Approximation Invoked For Static Drain Current • Model To Be Used As A Precursor To Computer–Based Studies 23
V – V 2 ds dss V – V 1 + gs hnc K V W  n I = d 2 L V – V gs hnc 1 + L E c V – V ds dss f =  V  / V 2   = b 2 V – V – V F T bsQ / / 1 + f V 2 V f 2   dss c g = g 1 – – mfs mf 1 + f 1 + f 1 + f c  c g =  g mbs b mfs I dQ g = o V + V – V  ds dss Short Channel Small Signal Model l Drain Current: l Intermediate Parameters: l Forward Transconductance: l Bulk Transconductance: l Output Conductance: 24
 s  ox Hypothetical Device l Physical Parameters l Device Parameters = 1.05 pF/cm = 345 fF/cm l Circuit Parameters 25
V  V hnc hn V  K = 276.0 µmho / volt n f  l Peripheral Calculations Static Performance  = 685.2 mV (Compensated Threshold) = 35.2 mV = 669.7 mV (Channel Length Voltage) (Transconductance Parameter) = 2.218 (Channel Length Parameter) • l Static Drain Current • Note Short Channel -To- Long Channel Ratio of 2.35; Ratio Is • Generally Between 1.5 And 3.0 26
–3  = 5.0 2 (10) (Bulk Parameter) b • l Forward Transconductance • Note Short Channel -To- Long Channel Ratio of 1.14; Ratio Is • Generally Between 0.5 And 2.0 • l Bulk Transconductance • Note Bulk Transconductance Is About 200 Times Smaller • Than Forward Transconductance • l Drain–Source Conductance • Corresponds To Shunt Output Resistance Of About 5 K • Mandates Conductance Enhancement Strategies When • Designing High Performance Transconductors Small Signal Parameters 27
D V C + C dd gd old c c c I C big bias g i g v g v o out c mf 1 mb 2 c c c C + C gs ols i i i in out in c v v   + + G S B 1 2 g – s C + C i mf gd old out = i s C + C + C + C in gs ols gd old µ V – V g n gs hn mf  T C + C + C + C 3 L 2 2 gs ols gd old d L + 3 L <<  C g T gd mf AC Short Circuit Device Unity Gain Frequency l   l • l Comments • Unity Gain Frequency Is Good Device Figure Of Merit; • Crude Circuit Performance Figure Of Merit • Result Assumes 28
V r + r 1 x ddl ol R = r + Leff ssl I 1 + 1 +  g r 1 +  g x bl mfl ol bl mfl Inverter Load Resistance Calculations   30
V g R g os mfd Leff mfd A = g R v mfd Leff  V R + r + r 1 + g s Leff ddd ssd bl mfl  1 + 1 + g r + bd mfd ssd r od / W L 1 d A v 1 +  / W L bl l Inverter Gain Calculations = –  –  –  – 31
1 1 1 B = = 3dB R C R C / | R R C out L Leff L Leff L V / x R = = r + r + 1 + 1 +  g r r ddd ssd bl mfd ssd od I x 1 +  g g 1 bl mfl mfd B A B = 3dB v 3dB R C C C Leff L L L Inverter Bandwidth Calculations    GBP  32