1 / 14

CONSER Publication Patterns Initiative / Holdings Record Discussion

CONSER Publication Patterns Initiative / Holdings Record Discussion. Les Hawkins CONSER Coordinator. Publication Patterns Initiative. Patterns database for predictive check-in ILS implementation or migration MARC 21 Format for Holdings. Shared Database Creation.

spencer
Télécharger la présentation

CONSER Publication Patterns Initiative / Holdings Record Discussion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CONSER Publication Patterns Initiative / Holdings RecordDiscussion Les Hawkins CONSER Coordinator

  2. Publication Patterns Initiative • Patterns database for predictive check-in • ILS implementation or migration • MARC 21 Format for Holdings

  3. Shared Database Creation • Beginnings of a shared pattern database • CONSER bibliographic record model • Loading shared patterns into local systems

  4. Patterns in CONSER Records • Use of the 891 field to encode pattern and holdings • 891 02ǂ9 853 ǂ8 1 ǂa kerekh ǂi year ǂm year • 891 40ǂ9 863 ǂ8 1 ǂa <1>- ǂi <5740>- ǂm <1979/1980>- ǂx provisional

  5. Outcomes • Patterns and holdings data (including enumeration and chronology) added to CONSER records • Patterns can be loaded into local ILS • Vendors and libraries have implemented the MARC 21 Format for Holding

  6. Outcomes • Serials Cooperative Cataloging Training Program (SCCTP) • Serials holdings workshop: • Frieda B. Rosenberg and Thom Saudargas • Margi Mann and Wen-ying Lu

  7. Outcomes • Publication history record concept • Sharing data that applies to the entire serial • Bibliographic or holdings format?

  8. Related outcomes • Ideas for applying FRBR for serials • Member involvement with ONIX for serials format development and piloting • MARC 21 development

  9. Questions • Patterns for Check-in? • Holdings data for e-serials? • Size of the database? • Support for ONIX exchanges? • Further development of MARC 21 Format for Holdings?

  10. Sharing holdings data that is • important in stating preservation action or intent or • applicable to the entire resource, rather than local holdings

  11. Local holdings record • Preservation related projects • Registry of Digital Masters • Single record approach • RLG Partnership Journals Preservation Project

  12. Fields in question would include: • 506 Restrictions on Access Note • 533 Reproduction Note* • 583 Action note • 856Electronic Location and Access • *The 533 is not currently valid in the Holdings Format.

  13. 856 Field • Location and access from various providers • Google books records

  14. 856 40 ǂ3 v.3 1961 Jul-Dec ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=QNtUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.3 1961 Jan-Jun ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=mdpUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.4 1962 Jul-Dec ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=_NtUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.2 1960 Jan-Jun ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=4dlUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.1 ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=_9hUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.2 1960 Jul-Dec ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=NNpUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project

More Related