140 likes | 260 Vues
The CONSER Patterns Initiative, spearheaded by Les Hawkins, focuses on developing a shared database for predictive check-in and optimizing the implementation of ILS through the MARC 21 Format for holdings. This initiative enhances bibliographic records by enabling libraries to share patterns and holdings data universally, promoting collaborative cataloging practices. Workshops and training programs like the Serials Cooperative Cataloging Training Program (SCCTP) encourage member involvement in ONIX for serials format development, enhancing preservation efforts and broadening access to serialized publications.
E N D
CONSER Publication Patterns Initiative / Holdings RecordDiscussion Les Hawkins CONSER Coordinator
Publication Patterns Initiative • Patterns database for predictive check-in • ILS implementation or migration • MARC 21 Format for Holdings
Shared Database Creation • Beginnings of a shared pattern database • CONSER bibliographic record model • Loading shared patterns into local systems
Patterns in CONSER Records • Use of the 891 field to encode pattern and holdings • 891 02ǂ9 853 ǂ8 1 ǂa kerekh ǂi year ǂm year • 891 40ǂ9 863 ǂ8 1 ǂa <1>- ǂi <5740>- ǂm <1979/1980>- ǂx provisional
Outcomes • Patterns and holdings data (including enumeration and chronology) added to CONSER records • Patterns can be loaded into local ILS • Vendors and libraries have implemented the MARC 21 Format for Holding
Outcomes • Serials Cooperative Cataloging Training Program (SCCTP) • Serials holdings workshop: • Frieda B. Rosenberg and Thom Saudargas • Margi Mann and Wen-ying Lu
Outcomes • Publication history record concept • Sharing data that applies to the entire serial • Bibliographic or holdings format?
Related outcomes • Ideas for applying FRBR for serials • Member involvement with ONIX for serials format development and piloting • MARC 21 development
Questions • Patterns for Check-in? • Holdings data for e-serials? • Size of the database? • Support for ONIX exchanges? • Further development of MARC 21 Format for Holdings?
Sharing holdings data that is • important in stating preservation action or intent or • applicable to the entire resource, rather than local holdings
Local holdings record • Preservation related projects • Registry of Digital Masters • Single record approach • RLG Partnership Journals Preservation Project
Fields in question would include: • 506 Restrictions on Access Note • 533 Reproduction Note* • 583 Action note • 856Electronic Location and Access • *The 533 is not currently valid in the Holdings Format.
856 Field • Location and access from various providers • Google books records
856 40 ǂ3 v.3 1961 Jul-Dec ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=QNtUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.3 1961 Jan-Jun ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=mdpUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.4 1962 Jul-Dec ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=_NtUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.2 1960 Jan-Jun ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=4dlUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.1 ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=_9hUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project 856 40 ǂ3 v.2 1960 Jul-Dec ǂu http://books.google.com/books?id=NNpUAAAAMAAJ ǂz Google Book Search Library Project