1 / 9

AS9104-3 Report: Training and Evaluation Requirements for AQMS Auditors

This report outlines the training and evaluation requirements for AQMS auditors based on the AS9104-3 standard. It includes information on auditor authentication, re-authentication, competency evaluations, and additional requirements for training providers. The report also highlights feedback and issues for further consideration.

stamper
Télécharger la présentation

AS9104-3 Report: Training and Evaluation Requirements for AQMS Auditors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AS9104-3 ReportJan 18, 2012San Diego, CA

  2. Team Members • Will Tate (TL), Triumph Aerostructures – Vought Aircraft Division • Jeff Wood • Rick Downs, Cessna-Textron • Vince May, Honeywell • Ian Folland • Tony Marino, Boeing • Ian Dummigan • Dominique Thiault • Lisa Greenleaf • Jeffery Long, UTC (Pratt & Whitney) • Reg Blake, IAAR • Shuji Komori • Giuseppe Leoni • Kimberly Maggie • Ron Tharach • Frank Phillips, RABQSA

  3. New Auditor • AA Authentication • 4 audits comprising 20 on-site auditor days QMS/AQMS audits 2 audits may exclude design (7.3) • QMS Lead Auditor course • AQMS Foundation Course (AATT) • Audit Competency Demonstration • CB Process • AAB Process • AEA Authentication • 4 audits comprising 20 on-site auditor days QMS/AQMS audits within 3 yrs 2 audits may exclude design (7.3) • QMS/AQMS Lead Auditor course • AQMS Foundation Course (AATT) within 3 yrs • 2/10 years ASD experience minimum • Technical Competence evaluated by CB –process approved by AB • Auditor Competency Demonstration after successful technical evaluation

  4. AA AEA Expansion • 150 on-site audit days of an AQMS in • 5 yr or250 on-site audit days of an AQMS in 10 yrEquivalent to full time relevant full time exp. @ 2.5/5 days/Mo. • Technical Competence evaluated by CB approved by AB • Auditor Competency evaluation (CB or AAB) • Re-authentication every 5 yrs • Re-authentication • Every 5 yrs • Same criteria as initial authentication • Attendance at one SMS auditor workshop during re-authentication period • Decision made by AAB, no SMS concurrence • Suspension / Withdrawal • Not fulfilling AS9104-1/3 reqmts • AQMS authentication contains false info • Falsified audit findings • Actions that would bring ICOP into dispute • Not informing AAB of a previous rejection, suspension, or withdrawal from another AAB • Decision for suspension, AAB will determine conditions of suspension

  5. Additional Requirements contained within AS9104/3 Draft • Training Provider Requirements • QMS • Administrative Procedures • Security • Record Retention • Complaints and appeals • Confidentiality • Course configuration mgmt (changes) • Course Variations • TP Suspension and withdrawal • TPAB Requirements • Record retention requirements • Training Courses requirements • 75% exam grade on essay questions • Requirements for training instructors • AAB requirements • Guidance on assessment Principles and Practices

  6. Additional Document Contents • Evaluator Qualification • Training reqmts of AA/AEA • Demonstrated knowledge of AQMS standard(s) • Demonstrated knowledge of assessment principles and practices • Continuing experience in 5yr period: 3 competency evaluations, 15 hrs of continuing education related to ASD • Annex A – Detaliled reqmts for Training Courses • Annex B – Definition of Competencies for ASD: AA and AEA • Annex C – AEA Technical Knowledge • Annex D – Guidance on Assessment Principles and Practices

  7. Feedback and Issues • Standard competency evaluation Checklist would be beneficial • AAB resource issues with oversight of CB evaluation Process • Need for AAB to offer alternative to CB evaluation Process • Evaluate methodology to allow non-authenticated auditors provisional status to conduct evaluation audit – similar to ISO 17021 • Resources required to develop approved “Evaluators” • Need to add process for AABs to communicate applicant rejection info to other AABs • Additional competencies for ASD above those identified in ISO 17021 • Clearly define re-authentication audit “participation” activities • Ensure that training certification expirations are defined.

  8. Next Steps • Complete ASD unique competencies • Clearly define Requirements for evaluating competencies • Define entities who can conduct competency evaluations • Ensure coordination with information in New AS9104-1/2

  9. Questions and Thoughts

More Related