1 / 14

ED Repeat Repeaters And Their Year-to-Year Visit Patterns: Is Intervention Really Needed?

ED Repeat Repeaters And Their Year-to-Year Visit Patterns: Is Intervention Really Needed?. June Brown, Matt Albrecht, Brian Tillis , Georgia Mueller, Jonathan dela Cruz. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL  . Background.

steffi
Télécharger la présentation

ED Repeat Repeaters And Their Year-to-Year Visit Patterns: Is Intervention Really Needed?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ED Repeat Repeaters And Their Year-to-Year Visit Patterns: Is Intervention Really Needed? June Brown, Matt Albrecht, Brian Tillis, Georgia Mueller, Jonathan dela Cruz. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 

  2. Background • Frequent ED Users = ½ of the $88 billion Medicaid dollars spent in ED • Past interventions • Case Management * • Patient education • Psych referrals • Primary Care partnership

  3. “Effectiveness Of Case Management Strategies In Reducing Emergency Department Visits In Frequent User Patient Population: Systematic Review” Kumar GS, Klein R, Emory University School of Medicine • 12 studies • 2 RCT • 8 pre/post interventions studies with historical controls • 2 age-matched controls • “Frequent User” defined from >3 visits/year to >5 visits/month • Majority of studies noted reduction in ED visits after CM implementation

  4. Do high frequency utilizers continue to visit the Emergency Department despite implementation of intervention strategies? • Our goal: to characterize high frequency ED users and their visit patterns over 3 calendar years, and to identify any natural trends in yearly visit frequency.

  5. Methods • Retrospective EMR review • All adult patients over 3-year period (Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011) • Repeat user = >12 visits/year • Classified as one-year, two-year, or three-year repeat user

  6. Results • 310 one-year repeaters: average 16.2 visit/patient • 79 two-year repeaters: average 21.2 visits/patient • 40 three-year repeaters: average 30 visits/patient

  7. Age

  8. Payer Status

  9. Primary Care Status

  10. Chief Complaint

  11. Conclusion • 3107940 • Decrease by ¼ then ½ • Visits/patient: 16  21  30 • Highest yield = interventions targeting the repeat repeaters

  12. Future Studies • Further characterize the repeater groups • Why do the one/two year repeaters stop repeating? • Why do the three year repeaters keep repeating?

  13. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Memorial Medical Center in Springfield, Illinois for the grant that made this data collection possible.

  14. Questions?

More Related