90 likes | 204 Vues
This report summarizes the findings, comments, and recommendations from the Review Committee assessing the Muon to Electron Conversion (Mu2e) Experiment Project at Fermilab. Evaluated by various subcommittees, including those focused on conceptual design, superconducting solenoids, detector systems, electronics, civil construction, cost, and project management, the report ensures that all design elements meet performance requirements and comply with the Department of Energy's documentation standards. Key conclusions regarding project duration, cost justification, and approval readiness are detailed.
E N D
OFFICE OFSCIENCE Closeout Report on the Review Committee for the Muon to Electron Conversion (Mu2e) Experiment Project Fermilab June 7, 2012 Example Daniel R. Lehman Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.1 Accelerator PhysicsR. Gerig, ANL / Subcommittee 1 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.2 Superconducting SolenoidsP. Wanderer, BNL / Subcommittee 2 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Detector SystemsS. Kettell, BNL / Subcommittee 3 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.4 Electronics/DAQ/Control SystemsR. Van Berg, U of PA / Subcommittee 4 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 3. Civil ConstructionJ. Sims, ANL/Subcommittee 5 • Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements? • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 4. Cost and ScheduleE. Merrill, DOE/SC/Subcommittee 6
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 4. Cost and ScheduleE. Merrill, DOE/SC/Subcommittee 6 • Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 4. Project Management & ES&HD. Loveless, U of Wisconsin/Subcommittee 7 • Does the proposed project team have adequate management experience, design skills, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline? • Are ES&H aspects being properly addressed and are future plans sufficient given the projects current stage of development? • Is the documentation required by DOE, satisfying Order 413.3B, ready for approval of CD-1? • Findings • Comments • Recommendations