1 / 6

Stability, Transport, and Conrol

IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2) 'Shape and Aspect Ratio Optimization for High Beta Steady-State Tokamak’ 14-15 Feb. 2005 at San Diego, GA. Stability, Transport, and Conrol. for the discussion Y. Miura. Stability (1). by Ferron,

step
Télécharger la présentation

Stability, Transport, and Conrol

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2) 'Shape and Aspect Ratio Optimization for High Beta Steady-State Tokamak’ 14-15 Feb. 2005 at San Diego, GA Stability, Transport, and Conrol for the discussion Y. Miura

  2. Stability (1) • by Ferron, • fbs pqN • fusion gain ENH89/q952 (increase qmin than q95) • peaked pressure profile reduces achievable N • near ideal N limit tearing mode still have significant effects on confinement • highest N obtained in balanced DN • high shape, but soften by Type I ELM • squareness reduces ELM size (it reduces pedestal pressure?) • by Rimini, • What are the changes when operating at high ? • ITBs are not compatible with large ELMs • Gas (light impurity) -> to reduce ELM size

  3. Stability (2) • by Kurita, • critical N values (n=1) for NCT are shown to be increased by increasing S (shape factor through  and A) • Max N using sector coil set is estimated • by Miura and Matsukawa, • The shape and aspect ratio are important to increase the critical  limit for NCT • By Menard, • For no wall limit • < N > ~3.2 nearly invariant ( extend to low A) • < N >/li is not A invariant • High d is required to take full advantage of high k at low A • < N > and q*=(1+2)/0IN are good measure for NSTX data • For ideal limit • N limit increases from 6 to 9 as A->1 • Are high , high  and low A always good for high N? • Where is an optimum condition for these parameters?

  4. Transport • by Petty, • Transport dependence on elongation and safety factor are weaker than IPB98(y,2) relation but close to EGB relation • For “optimum tokamak”, fusion gain is optimized between aspect ratio of 2.2 and 3.0 (depending upon which confinement scaling relation is used) • If stability limit and elongation are assumed independent of aspect ratio, then fusion gain optimizes at higher R/a • by Field, • BE0.73[IPBy2] => 0.83[IPBy2-PBXM +MAST] • Pedestal scaling => HFS pedestal width scaling • by Saibene, • High plasma shaping (d, k, QDN)  common element to all small ELM experiments in JET • At low bp, mixed Type I-II ELMs are observed in SN and QDN – increasing q95 closes off access to high nped and no Type II ELMs • High bp: “threshold” similar to JT-60U, but different collisionality Can we reduce ELMs at highly shaped plasma?

  5. Control (1) • by Litaudon, • Increasing the H & CD at P~45MW(NB & IC upgrade) • Access to bootstrap-dominated regimes at 2.5MA, N>2.5 • Explore -scaling • ~1/3 of PNB in counter to control V • Upgrade of LHCD launcher • Reliable PLHCD~3MW in H-mode • by Miura, Kurita and Matsukawa, • Control of NTM by ECCD in NCT • Further optimization is necessary to improve response time of feedback field to the plasma • Shaping controllability

  6. Control (2) • by Sabbagh, • In NSTX, N ~6.8. The RWM control in NSTX was discussed. • by Hubbard, • Current profile control by LH was discussed. • In C-MOD, 3MW LH (4.6GHz) is ready for the experiment. • by Moreau, • Real time current profile, shape, profile and flux control were discussed. • It is towards controlled advanced scenarios on JET There are some methods to control plasma in this workshop. High fbs plasma is a self-oganized plasma. We have to find the way to control a burning plasma with high fbs.

More Related