1 / 12

Task variety

Task variety. HIGH. Task concentration. HIGH. Task fragmentation. % Novel Tasks. LOW. HIGH. % Grown Tasks. STUDY 1: OFFLINE. STUDY 1: OFFLINE. Task variety. Task concentration. Task fragmentation. 70%. 13. r = .36*. % Grown tasks. 60%. 12. r = .46**. 50%. 11.

stephen-navarro
Télécharger la présentation

Task variety

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Task variety HIGH Task concentration HIGH Task fragmentation % Novel Tasks LOW HIGH % Grown Tasks

  2. STUDY 1: OFFLINE

  3. STUDY 1: OFFLINE Task variety Task concentration Task fragmentation

  4. 70% 13 r= .36* % Grown tasks 60% 12 r= .46** 50% 11 Task variety 40% 10 % Novel tasks 30% 9 20% 8 0-3 y (n=8) 4-5 y (n=14) 6-10 y (n=9) 10+ y (n=6) Org. tenure (years)

  5. IDIOSYNCRATIC TASK COMPOSITIONS INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT FACTORS SALARY POSITION ORG. TENURE ADDS TO EXPLAINING WITHIN OCCUPATIONAL TASK VARIANCE …THE VARIANCE IS THERE. HOW DO WE DEAL WITH IT? SALARY POSITION A B ORG. TENURE CONCLUSIONS TASK INTER- DEPENDENCE PERSONAL INITIATIVE TASK INTER- DEPENDENCE PERSONAL INITIATIVE

  6. THANK YOU! Contact: luc.dorenbosch@tno.nl

  7. Task variety Task concentration Task fragmentation % Novel Tasks % Grown Tasks

More Related