1 / 48

Some Applications of Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT).

Some Applications of Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT). G.Kotliar Physics Department Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University. Density Functional Theory Meets Strong Correlation. Montauk September 5-9 (2006). Outline. Sketch of some DMFT ideas.

Télécharger la présentation

Some Applications of Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT).

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some Applications of Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT). G.Kotliar Physics Department Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University. Density Functional Theory Meets Strong Correlation. Montauk September 5-9 (2006).

  2. Outline • Sketch of some DMFT ideas. • Application : Localization-Delocalization Transition in actinides .a) Pu b) Am • DFT and DMFT formalism. • Acknowledgment: • Collaborators K. Haule (Rutgers) S. Savrasov (UCDavis) and N. Zein (Kurchatov) • Discussions : M. Fluss J. C Griveaux G Lander A. Lawson A. Migliori J.Singleton J.Smith J Thompson J. Tobin • $upport: NSF DOE- BES

  3. Order in Perturbation Theory n=1 Order in PT n=2 Basis set size. l=1 r=1 DMFT l=2 r site CDMFT r=2 l=lmax GW GW+ first vertex correction Range of the clusters

  4. DMFT Cavity Construction. Happy marriage of atomic and band physics. Extremize a functional of the local spectra. Local self energy. Reviews: A. Georges G. Kotliar W. Krauth and M. Rozenberg RMP68 , 13, 1996 Gabriel Kotliar and Dieter Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004). G. Kotliar S. Savrasov K. Haule V. Oudovenko O. Parcollet and C. Marianetti Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006) . G. Kotliar and D . Vollhardt Physics 53 Today (2004)

  5. Mott transition in one band model. Review Georges et.al. RMP 96 T/W Phase diagram of a Hubbard model with partial frustration at integer filling. [Rozenberg et. al. PRL 1995] Evolution of the Local Spectra as a function of U,and T. Mott transition driven by transfer of spectral weight Zhang Rozenberg Kotliar PRL (1993)..

  6. Pu issues • All the spin density functional studies of fcc Pu, using either LDA or GGA, predict magnetic long range order with a large moment. Experimentally d Pu is not magnetic. • If one treats the f electrons as part of the core LDA overestimates the volume by 30% • Valence of Pu controversy. LDA+U Schick, Havela Lichtenstein et.al. Anisimov et.al.(5f)^6. Erickson and Wills (5f)^4.

  7. Pu phases: A. Lawson Los Alamos Science 26, (2000) Experimentally Pu is not magnetic. No trace of ordered or low frequency fluctuating local moments. [Lashley et. al. cond-matt 0410634] PRB 054416(2005). Approach the Mott transition from the left. (delocalized side).

  8. Approach the Mott point from the right Am under pressure Experimental Equation of State (after Heathman et.al, PRL 2000) Mott Transition? “Soft” “Hard” Density functional based electronic structure calculations: • Non magnetic LDA/GGA predicts volume 50% off. • Magnetic GGA corrects most of error in volume but gives m~6mB (Soderlind et.al., PRB 2000). • Experimentally, Am hasnon magnetic f6ground state with J=0(7F0)

  9. Resistivity of Am under pressure. J. C. Griveau J.Rebizant G. Lander and G. Kotliar PRL 94, 097002 (2005).

  10. Curium is magnetic Hurray et.al. Physica. B (1980) 217 m=2S+L LS coupling L=0 S=7 m=7 jj coupling J=7/2 m=3+1=4 Expt monent . is closer to L S coupling

  11. Applications of DMFT to actinides • S. Savrasov G.Kotliar and E. Abrahams [neglect multiplets] energy and spectra IPT imp. Solver • Phonons [Dai et.al.] [Hubbard I imp solver] • Could not address the existence of magnetically ordered states or the interplay of magnetism multiplets and Kondo physics. • Recent review see G. Kotliar S. Savrasov K. Haule V. Oudovenko O. Parcollet and C. Marianetti Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006) • Recent progress : K. Haule SUNCA imp. solver, full multiplet structure and Kondo physics compete on equal footing. Can consider DMFT eqs. in different ordered phases.

  12. Minimum in melting curve and divergence of the compressibility at the Mott endpoint

  13. Total Energy as a function of volume for Pu W(ev) vs (a.u. 27.2 ev) Pu Zein (2005) Following Aryasetiwan Imada Georges Kotliar Bierman and Lichtenstein. PRB 70 195104. (2004) (Savrasov, Kotliar, Abrahams, Nature ( 2001) Non magnetic correlated state of fcc Pu.

  14. Phonon freq (THz) vs q in delta Pu X. Dai et. al. Science vol 300, 953, 2003

  15. C11 (GPa) C44 (GPa) C12 (GPa) C'(GPa) Theory 34.56 33.03 26.81 3.88 Experiment 36.28 33.59 26.73 4.78 DMFT Phonons in fcc d-Pu ( Dai, Savrasov, Kotliar,Ledbetter, Migliori, Abrahams, Science, 9 May 2003) (experiments from Wong et.al, Science, 22 August 2003)

  16. Double well structure and d Pu Qualitative explanation of negative thermal expansion[Lawson, A. C., Roberts J. A., Martinez, B., and Richardson, J. W., Jr. Phil. Mag. B, 82, 1837,(2002). G. Kotliar J.Low Temp. Physvol.126, 1009 27. (2002)] F(T,V)=Fphonons+Finvar Natural consequence of the conclusions on the model Hamiltonian level. We had two solutions at the same U, one metallic and one insulating. Relaxing the volume expands the insulator and contract the metal.

  17. Curie-Weiss Tc Photoemission in Actinides alpa->delta volume collapse transition F0=4,F2=6.1 F0=4.5,F2=7.15 F0=4.5,F2=8.11 Curium has large magnetic moment and orders antif Pu does is non magnetic.

  18. The “DMFT-valence” in the late actinides

  19. Approach the Mott point from the right Am under pressure Experimental Equation of State (after Heathman et.al, PRL 2000) Mott Transition? “Soft” “Hard” Density functional based electronic structure calculations: • Non magnetic LDA/GGA predicts volume 50% off. • Magnetic GGA corrects most of error in volume but gives m~6mB (Soderlind et.al., PRB 2000). • Experimentally, Am hasnon magnetic f6ground state with J=0

  20. Am equation of state. LDA+DMFT.New acceleration technique for solving DMFT equations S. Savrasov K. Haule G. Kotliar cond-mat. 0507552 (2005)

  21. Resistivity of Am under pressure. J. C. Griveau Rebizant Lander and Kotliar PRL 94, 097002 (2005).

  22. Photoemission spectra using Hubbard I solver [Lichtenstein and Katsnelson, PRB 57, 6884,(1998 ), Svane cond-mat 0508311] and Sunca . [Savrasov Haule and Kotliar cond-mat 0507552] Hubbard bands width is determined by multiplet splittings.

  23. Photomission Spectra of Am under pressure. Sunca. Onset of mixed valence. Savrasov Haule Kotliar PRL (2005)

  24. The “DMFT-valence” in the late actinides

  25. <l.s> in the late actinides [DMFT results: K. Haule and J. Shim ]

  26. Conclusions 5f systems at the Mott boundary. Pu and Am. • Single site DMFT describes well, the total energy of phases, the phonon spectra, the photoemission spectra, of Am and Pu. • Am Pu are non magnetic Pu is magnetic in agreement with expts. • Qualitative explanation of mysterious phenomena, such as the negative thermal expansion in delta Pu, the volume contraction in the delta-epsilon transition, the anomalous raise in resistivity as one applies pressure to Am metal, etc…..

  27. Density functional and Kohn Sham reference system • Kohn Sham spectra, proved to be an excellent starting point for doing perturbation theory in screened Coulomb interactions GW.

  28. - [ - ] = [ - ]-1 = G = W GW approximation (Hedin )

  29. One electron spectral function Weak correlations Intermediate -Strong Correlations

  30. Strongly Correlated Materials • Can we construct a conceptual framework and computational tools, for studying strongly correlated materials, which will be as successful as the Fermi Liquid –LDA-GW program ? • Is a local perspective reasonable ? accurate ? • Dynamical Mean Field Theory . Unify band theory and atomic physics. Use an impurity model, (local degrees of freedom + free electron enviroment ) to describe the local spectra of a correlated system.

  31. Spectral density functional. Effective action construction.e.g Fukuda et.al

  32. In practice we need good approximations to the exchange correlation, in DFT LDA. In spectral density functional theory, DMFT. Review: Kotliar et.al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006) Kohn Sham equations

  33. Different methods differ by the choice of variable a used. • DFT • Spin and Density FT Spectral Density Functional R. Chitra and G.K Phys. Rev. B 62, 12715 (2000).S. Savrasov and G.K PRB (2005)

  34. C DMFT extend the notion of “locality”to several unit cells DFT+DMFT • U (and form of dc) are input parameters. • EDMFT a=“ Gloc Wloc” Cluster Greens Function and Screened interaction, No input parameters. • Recently impelemented and tested for sp systems. Si C …. • N. Zein et.al.PRL 96, (2006) 226403 Zein and Antropov PRL 89,126402 • Review: Kotliar et.al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006)

  35. Conclusion • DMFT, method under very active development. But there is now a clear formulation (and to large extent implementation) as a fully self consistent, controlled many body approach to solids. • It gives good quantitative results for total energies, phonon and photoemission spectra, and transport of materials. Many examples…all over the periodic table. • Helpful in developing intuition and qualitative insights in correlated electron materials. • With advances in implementation, we will be able to focus on deviations from (cluster) dynamical mean field theory.

  36. Functional formulation. Chitra and Kotliar Phys. Rev. B 62, 12715 (2000)and Phys. Rev.B (2001).  Introduce Notion of Local Greens functions, Wloc, Gloc G=Gloc+Gnonloc . Ex. Ir>=|R, r> Gloc=G(R r, R r’) dR,R’’ Sum of 2PI graphs One can also view as an approximation to an exact Spetral Density Functional of Gloc and Wloc.

  37. Order in Perturbation Theory n=1 Order in PT n=2 Basis set size. l=1 r=1 DMFT l=2 r site CDMFT r=2 GW+ first vertex correction l=lmax GW Range of the clusters

  38. IPT: Georges Kotliar (1992). . QMC: M. Jarrell, (1992), NCA T.Pruschke D. Cox and M. Jarrell (1993), ED:Caffarel Krauth and Rozenberg (1994) Projective method: G Moeller (1995). NRG: R. Bulla et. al. PRL 83, 136 (1999) ,……………………………………... • Pruschke et. al Adv. Phys. (1995) • Georges et. al RMP (1996) Mean-Field : Classical vs Quantum Classical case Quantum case Hard!!! Easy!!! QMC: J. Hirsch R. Fye (1986) NCA : T. Pruschke and N. Grewe (1989) PT : Yoshida and Yamada (1970) NRG: Wilson (1980) A. Georges, G. Kotliar (1992)

  39. How good is the local approximation ??? Exact in infinite dimensions , very good also in one dimension! Cellular DMFT [Kotliar et. al. PRL (2001) ] Test in 1d Hubbard model Capone Civelli Sarma Castellani and Kotliar PRB69,195105 (2004) ]

  40. CDMFT: removes limitations of single site DMFT • No k dependence of the self energy. • No d-wave superconductivity. • No Peierls dimerization. • No (R)valence bonds. Various cluster approaches, DCA momentum spcace. Cellular DMFT G. Kotliar et.al. PRL (2004). O Parcollet G. Biroli and G. Kotliar B 69, 205108 (2004) T. D. Stanescu and G. Kotliar cond-mat/0508302 Reviews: Georges et.al. RMP(1996). Th. Maier, M. Jarrell, Th.Pruschke, M.H. Hettler RMP (2005); G. Kotliar S. Savrasov K. Haule O. Parcollet V. Udovenko and C. Marianetti RMP (2006)

  41. Local Self-Energy of Spectral Density Functional • is local by construction and plays • auxiliary role exactly like Kohn-Sham potential in DFT • Energy dependent Kohn-Sham (Dyson) equations give • rise to energy-dependent band structure • have physical meaning in contrast to Kohn-Sham spectra. are designed to reproduce local spectral density

  42. LDA+GW: semiconducting gaps

More Related