1 / 14

A case that left us wondering...

This interesting case report discusses a 25-year-old male with a 3-4 cm lump near the left testicle. The differential diagnosis includes epididymal cyst and solid paratesticular lesions. Surgical biopsy reveals splenogonadal fusion, a rare condition. This case emphasizes the importance of considering congenital anomalies and avoiding unnecessary orchidectomy.

sueann
Télécharger la présentation

A case that left us wondering...

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A case that left us wondering... Dr Matthew Seager & Dr Miles Walkden BSGAR-BSUR Interesting Cases 2019 matthew.seager1@nhs.net

  2. Clinical information • 25 male • 2 week referral by GP due to “3-4 cm” lump superior to the left testicle • Felt to be epididymal cyst, but could be testicular in origin O/E

  3. * Longitudinal section ultrasound image - left paratesticular region. * - epididymis thought to be separate.

  4. Longitudinal section ultrasound image - left paratesticular region with colour Doppler

  5. Transverse section ultrasound image – left paratesticular region with colour Doppler

  6. Differential diagnosis ✗ - not cystic • Epididymal cyst Solid paratesticular lesions: • Adenomatoid tumour • Spermatic cord lipoma • Leiomyoma • Haemangioma • Sarcoma MDT decision: given vascularity -> surgical biopsy +/- excision ? - usually epididymal - tail ? -atypical appearance ? -not typically so vascular ? - extremely rare, but is vascular ? - long history of lump

  7. Final diagnosis • Lesion separate from epididymis at surgery • Closely associated with testicular vessels so not removed • 3 x biopsies obtained: • Ectopic splenic tissue • Given the location - final diagnosis of splenogonadal fusion

  8. White pulp Red pulp

  9. Discussion Splenogonadal fusion: • M:F 15:1, nearly all left • Close proximity of developing gonad and spleen in embryonic weeks 5-8 • Continuous or discontinuous • Continuous variety – 1/3 congenital abnormalities e.g. cryptorchidism, limb defects • Fusion with mesonephric derivatives rarely

  10. Discussion • Presentation • 40% scrotal swelling • 20% inguinal hernia • 18% autopsy diagnosis • 15% cryptorchidism • 7% other • Imaging • Slight reduced reflectivity relative to testis • May be difficult to separate from testis – DD for testicular Ca • Central vascular pattern branching to periphery c.f. disorganised malignant • Difficult to pre-operatively suspect but 99mTc sulphur colloid diagnostic Varma et al. Marko et al.

  11. Discussion Longitudinal section ultrasound image

  12. Discussion • Management • Avoid unnecessary orchidectomy! • No evidence increased malignancy ✗

  13. Key learning points • Rare condition • Consider splenogonadal fusion with a paratesticular mass and congenital anomalies • Awareness may allow appropriate pre-operative workup to avoid orchidectomy • Important to be aware of more common causes for solid paratesticular lesions

  14. References • Putschar WGJ, Manion WC. Splenic-gonadal fusion. Am J Pathol. 1956;32: 15–33. • Carragher AM. One hundred years of splenogonadal fusion. Urology. 1990;35: 471–75. • Varma et al. Sonographic and CT features of splenogonadal fusion. PediatrRadiol. 2007;37(9): 916-9. • Marko et al. Testicular seminoma and its mimics. Radiographics. 2017;37(4): 1085-98. • Stewart VR, et al. Splenogonadal fusion. B-mode and color Doppler sonographic appearances. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23: 1087-90.

More Related