1 / 10

Assessment of Outdoor Crime Scenes ILEETA

Assessment of Outdoor Crime Scenes ILEETA. Thanks to Dr. Jason Birkett. Opening image of corpse after bear attack as example of forensic work removed for sensitive viewing purposes. Lincoln Crime Scene. Student’s hard at it!. Exercise criteria

summer-kerr
Télécharger la présentation

Assessment of Outdoor Crime Scenes ILEETA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment of Outdoor Crime Scenes ILEETA Thanks to Dr. Jason Birkett Opening image of corpse after bear attack as example of forensic work removed for sensitive viewing purposes

  2. Lincoln Crime Scene

  3. Student’s hard at it!

  4. Exercise criteria Working as a team of scene of crime personnel, you are required to attend an on-site briefing session Each team needs to have personnel fulfilling the following roles: Scene Manager Photographer Scene mapper Physical evidence collector (x 2) Vegetation assessor (x 2) Evidence to be recorded in situ Setting the Scene

  5. Examples of Evidence

  6. Assessment Criteria • The poster should give appropriate details of: • The site location • Site/Scene features • Personnel involved • Actions taken • Evidence identified in the field • Follow-up laboratory procedures and findings • Conclusions • Key References

  7. Assessment Criteria • Marks are awarded on the following key features: • Visual impact/ Impression • Creativity/Design • Presentation • Technical detail (evidence and its relevance) • Interpretation and conclusions • Overall effectiveness as a means of scientific communication

  8. What the students think ! • ‘Really enjoyed it. I gained valuable experience from this’ • ‘Very enjoyable and interesting’ • ‘Poster presentation a good idea’ • ‘Poster was a good team method of assessment’ • ‘Effective and enjoyable way of being assessed’ • ‘Poster presentation OK, but felt a little childish’ • ‘Would like to ‘Bag and Tag’ the evidence’

  9. A student poster

  10. Questions/Comments/Ideas for Improvement?

More Related