1 / 7

Team C Oregon State SaaS Contract Brokering

Team C Oregon State SaaS Contract Brokering. DHS. PO. ODOT. PO. DCBS. DVA. PO. OED. SOS. PO. PO. SPO. PO. DOR. DAS. DOC. PO. PO. OSP. PO. PO. PO. ODF. PO. DOF. DOA. PO. PO. PO. WRD. DEQ. ODE. GMI. PO. PO. DOJ. PO. PO. OSL. ODA. PO. HCS.

suzuki
Télécharger la présentation

Team C Oregon State SaaS Contract Brokering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Team C Oregon State SaaS Contract Brokering

  2. DHS PO ODOT PO DCBS DVA PO OED SOS PO PO SPO PO DOR DAS DOC PO PO OSP PO PO PO ODF PO DOF DOA PO PO PO WRD DEQ ODE GMI PO PO DOJ PO PO OSL ODA PO HCS C.1 Business Challenge CURRENT STATE: The Department of Administrative Services State Procurement Office (SPO) was established to develop, establish and administer contracts for goods and services on behalf of state agencies, and local governments. In addition, many individual state agencies still have their own IT procurement and contracting processes. (See Graph) There is concern that the current IT procurement environment still has room for improvements. Therefore, if we move forward with Software as a Service (SaaS) for state, we have to reaffirm the role of SPO as the one-stop shop for SaaS contract management for all individual state agencies.

  3. C.2 Workshop Team Challenge In one and half day, the workshop participants have to perform the following tasks: • Recommend a list of potential SaaS solutions that can be pursued on a state enterprise license agreement • Rank these solutions into three levels: - Short-term candidates - Mid-term candidates - Long-term candidates

  4. C.3 Workshop Methodology • WORKSHOP TOOLS • Decision-making tools that workshop participants used include: • - Brainstorming tool • Investment matrix • TOOL CONSTRUCTION • The eight criteria that workshop participants decide to use on the investment matrix include: • Security: Impact on customer data security when implementing the SaaS solution • Time to Value: The time it takes for the SaaS solution to yield value • Market Maturity: The maturity level of the SaaS market for that solution • Switching Cost: The switching cost occurs switching to a state license agreement • Payback Period: Overall payback period for the investment • Degree of Commonality: Rough estimate of potential agency usage of the solution • Implementation Cost: Additional costs such as legal, negotiation costs, etc. • Vendor Mobility/Business Continuity: Ease of exiting from state contract in case vendors go out of business

  5. Workshop Result

  6. Potential SaaS candidate list for enterprise license agreement * The final category was added after the workshop due to opportunity for state contract renewal

  7. SaaS Investment Matrix Long-term Mid-term Short-term

More Related