1 / 67

On the Trail of a Dense Plasma at RHIC (a detector builder’s point of view) Jim Thomas

On the Trail of a Dense Plasma at RHIC (a detector builder’s point of view) Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Cornell University Journal Club 5/21/2004. The Phase Diagram for Nuclear Matter. One of the goals of RHIC is to understand the QCD in the context of the many body problem

svea
Télécharger la présentation

On the Trail of a Dense Plasma at RHIC (a detector builder’s point of view) Jim Thomas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. On the Trail of a Dense Plasma at RHIC (a detector builder’s point of view) Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Cornell University Journal Club 5/21/2004

  2. The Phase Diagram for Nuclear Matter • One of the goals of RHIC is to understand the QCD in the context of the many body problem • Another goal is to discover and characterize the Quark Gluon Plasma • RHIC is a place where fundamental theory and experiment can meet after many years of being apart The goal is to explore nuclear matter under extreme conditions – T > mpc2 and r > 10 * r0 K. Rajagopol

  3. { W. Zajc QCD is a Rich Theory with Many Features We have a theory of the strong interaction Low(er) energy nuclear physics uses OPEP or descriptions in terms of a pion gas. These worked because QCD is a theory with a mass gap. This gap is a manifestation of the approximate SU(2)R x SU(2)Lchiral symmetry of QCD with pions as the Nambu-Goldstone bosons Hadron “level” Diagram

  4. TC ~ 170 15 MeV eC ~ 0.7 GeV/fm3 e0 ~ 0.16 GeV/fm3 Energy Density Karsch QM2004 Temperature Lattice QCD predictions Stephan Boltzman limits for a free Quark Gluon gas TC ~ 170 MeV, a very stable prediction over time & technologies (F. Karsch, hep-lat/0106019, edited by JT)

  5. BRAHMS PHOBOS PHENIX Long Island Who is RHIC and What Does He Do? RHIC • Two independent rings • 3.83 km in circumference • Accelerates everything, from p to Au Ös L p-p 500 1032 Au-Au 200 1026 (GeV and cm-2 s-1) • Polarized protons • Two Large and two small detectors have been built h

  6. RHIC Physics is Relativistic Nuclear Physics

  7. The Initial State is Important • Only a few of the nucleons participate as determined by the impact parameter • There is multiple scattering in the initial state before the hard collisions take place • Cronin effect • The initial state is Lorentz contracted • Cross-sections become coherent. • The uncertainty principle allows wee partons to interact with the front and back of the nucleus • The interaction rate for wee partons saturates ( ρσ = 1 ) • The intial state is even time dilated • A color glass condensate •proton•neutron•delta•pionstring

  8. Time Projection Chamber Magnet Coils Silicon Tracker SVT & SSD TPC Endcap & MWPC FTPCs Endcap Calorimeter Beam Beam Counters Barrel EM Calorimeter Central Trigger Barrel & TOF How do we ‘see’ RHIC physics? Not Shown: pVPDs, ZDCs, PMD, and FPDs 4.2 meters A TPC lies at the heart of STAR

  9. Gas: P10 ( Ar-CH4 90%-10% ) @ 1 atm Voltage : - 28 kV at the central membrane 135 V/cm over 210 cm drift path 420 CM TPC Gas Volume & Electrostatic Field Cage Self supporting Inner Field Cage:Al on Kapton using Nomex honeycomb; 0.5% rad length

  10. Pixel Readout of a Pad Plane Sector A cosmic ray + deltaelectron 3 sigma threshold

  11. f from K+ K- pairs dn/dm background subtracted m inv dn/dm K+ K- pairs same event dist. mixed event dist. m inv Particle ID using Topology & Combinatorics Secondary vertex: Ks p + p L  p + p X  L + p W  L + K g  e++e- Ks p + + p - f  K + + K - L  p + p - r  p + + p - “kinks” K  + 

  12. Au on Au Event at CM Energy ~ 130 GeV*A Data taken June 25, 2000. The first 12 events were captured on tape! Real-time track reconstruction Pictures from Level 3 online display. ( < 70 mSec )

  13. Au on Au Event at CM Energy ~ 130 GeV*A A Central Event Typically 1000 to 2000 tracks per event into the TPC Two-track separation 2.5 cm Momentum Resolution < 2% Space point resolution ~ 500 mm Rapidity coverage –1.8 < h < 1.8

  14. Boost invariant hydrodynamics: Bjorken Estimate of Initial Energy Density ~ 6.5 fm t~ 0.2 - 1 fm/c time to thermalize the system pR2 Bjorken Estimate of Initial Energy Density Cold nuclear matter: r0~ 0.16 GeV/fm3 30xr0 nucl-ex/0311017 PRL 87 (01) 52301

  15. Rapidity vs xf • xf = pz / pmax • A natural variable to describe physics at forward scattering angles • Rapidity is different. It is a measure of velocity but it stretches the region around v = c to avoid the relativistic scrunch • Rapidity is relativistically invariant and cross-sections are invariant β Rapidity is the natural kinematic variable for HI collisions ( y is approximately the lab angle where y = 0 at 90 degrees )

  16. Bose-Einstein fits mt exponential fits K- p+ Identified Particle Spectra at 200 GeV p+, p-, K+, K- spectra versus centrality PRL 92 (2004) 171801 and nucl-ex/0206008

  17. gaussian fits p 200 GeV data 130 GeV data Anti-Proton Spectra at 200 & 130 GeV / N Au + Au  p + X p p andp spectra versus centrality PRL 92 (2004) 171801 and PRL 87 (2001) 262302

  18. Anti-Baryon/Baryon Ratios versus sNN • In the early universe • p/ p ratio = 0.999999 • At RHIC, pair-production increases with s • Mid-rapidity region is not yet baryon-free! • Pair production is larger than baryon transport • 80% of protons from pair production • 20% from initial baryon number transported over 5 units of rapidity In HI collisions at RHIC, more baryons are pair produced than are brought in by the initial state

  19. K+/K- ratios  p/p ratios Anti-Particle to Particle Ratios STAR results on thep/p ratio • p/p = 0.11 ± 0.01 @ 20 GeV • p/p = 0.71 ± 0.05 @ 130 GeV • p/p = 0.80 ± 0.05 @ 200 GeV Excellent agreement between experiments at y = 0, Ös = 130

  20. Thermal model fits Compare to QCD on Lattice: Tc = 154 ± 8 MeV (Nf=3) Tc = 173 ± 8 MeV (Nf=2) (ref. Karsch QM01) Chemical Freeze-out – from a thermal model • The model assumes a thermally and chemically equilibrated fireball at hadro-chemical freeze-out • Works great, but there is not word of QCD in the analysis. Done entirely in a color neutral Hadronic basis! input: measured particle ratiosoutput: temperature T and baryo-chemical potential B

  21. Lattice results Neutron STAR Putting RHIC on the Phase Diagram • Final-state analysis suggests RHIC reaches the phase boundary • Hadron spectra cannot probe higher temperatures • Hadron resonance ideal gas (M. Kaneta and N. Xu, nucl-ex/0104021 & QM02) • TCH = 175 ± 10 MeV • B = 40 ± 10 MeV • <E>/N ~ 1 GeV • (J. Cleymans and K. Redlich, PRL 81, p. 5284, 1998 ) We know where we are on the phase diagram but now we want to know what other features are on the diagram

  22. time Kinetic freeze-out Chemical freeze-out elastic interactions inelastic interactions space blue beam yellow beam Chemical and Kinetic Freeze-out • Chemical freeze-out (first) • End of inelastic interactions • Number of each particle species is frozen • Useful data • Particle ratios • Kinetic freeze-out (later) • End of elasticinteractions • Particle momenta are frozen • Useful data • Transverse momentum distributions • and Effective temperatures

  23. T ≈ 215 MeV The transverse radial expansion of the source (flow) adds kinetic energy to the particle distribution. So the classical expression for ETot suggests a linear relationship T ≈ 310 MeV T ≈ 575 MeV Slopes decrease with mass. <pT> and the effective temperature increase with mass. Transverse Flow Au+Au at 200 GeV  - STAR Preliminary K- p

  24. <r> [c] PHENIX Tth [GeV] STAR Kinetic Freezeout from Transverse Flow STAR Preliminary <ßr> (RHIC) = 0.55 ± 0.1 c TKFO(RHIC) = 100 ± 10 MeV Thermal freeze-out determinations are done with the blast-wave model to find <pT> Explosive Transverse Expansion at RHIC  High Pressure

  25. Peripheral Collisions z y x Anisotropic Flow py px Anisotropic (Elliptic) Transverse Flow • The overlap region in peripheral collisions is not symmetric in coordinate space • Almond shaped overlap region • Easier for particles to emerge in the direction of x-z plane • Larger area shines to the side • Spatial anisotropy  Momentum anisotropy • Interactions among constituents generates a pressure gradient which transforms the initial spatial anisotropy into the observed momentum anisotropy • Perform a Fourier decomposition of the momentum space particle distributions in the x-y plane • v2 is the 2nd harmonic Fourier coefficient of the distribution of particles with respect to the reaction plane

  26. Hydro predictions PRL 86, (2001) 402 more central  v2 vs. Centrality • v2 is large • 6% in peripheral collisions • Smaller for central collisions • Hydro calculations are in reasonable agreement with the data • In contrast to lower collision energies where hydro over-predicts anisotropic flow • Anisotropic flow is developed by rescattering • Data suggests early time history • Quenched at later times Anisotropic transverse flow is large at RHIC

  27. PRL 86, 402 (2001) & nucl-ex/0107003 v2 vs. pT and Particle Mass • The mass dependence is reproduced by hydrodynamic models • Hydro assumes local thermal equilibrium • At early times • Followed by hydrodynamic expansion D. Teaney et al., QM2001 Proc.P. Huovinen et al., nucl-th/0104020 Hydro does a surprisingly good job!

  28. qn Coalescence V2 at high Pt shows meson / baryon differences Bulk PQCD Hydro Asym. pQCD Jet Quenching

  29. The Recombination Model ( Fries et al. PRL 90 (2003) 202303 ) The flow pattern in v2(pT) for hadrons is predicted to be simple if flow is developed at the quark level pT → pT /n v2 → v2 / n , n = (2, 3) for (meson, baryon)

  30. What does this mean? • Hadrons are created by the recombination of quarks and this appears be the dominant mechanism for hadron formation at intermediate PT • Baryons and Mesons are produced with equal abundance at intermediate PT • The collective flow pattern of the hadrons appears to reflect the collective flow of the constituent quarks. Partonic Collectivity

  31. Initial state Final state Au + Au d + Au p + p Lets look at some collision systems in detail …

  32. Binary collision scaling p+p reference Partonic energy loss via leading hadrons Energy loss  softening of fragmentation  suppression of leading hadron yield

  33. nucl-ex/0305015, PRL in press PRL 89, 202301 Au+Au and p+p: inclusive charged hadrons p+p reference spectrum measured at RHIC

  34. Suppresion of inclusive hadron yield Au+Au relative to p+p RAA Au+Au central/peripheral RCP nucl-ex/0305015 • central Au+Au collisions: factor ~4-5 suppression • pT>5 GeV/c: suppression ~ independent of pT

  35. PHENIX observes a similar effect (p0s) nucl-ex/0304022 lower energy Pb+Pb lower energy a+a Factor ~5 suppression for central Au+Au collisions

  36. The Suppression occurs in Au-Au but not d-Au

  37. Jet Physics … it is easier to find one in e+e- Jet event in e+e-collision STAR Au+Au collision

  38. Identifying jets on a statistical basis in Au-Au • You can see the jets in p-p data at RHIC • Identify jets on a statistical basis in Au-Au • Given a trigger particle with pT > pT (trigger), associate particles with pT > pT (associated) STAR Data Au+Au @ 200 GeV/c 0-5% most central 4 < pT(trig) < 6 GeV/c 2 < pT(assoc.) < pT(trig)

  39. Angular Distribution: Peripheral Au+Au data vs. pp+flow • Ansatz: • A high pT triggered • Au+Au event is a superposition of a high pT triggered • p+p event plus anisotropic transverse flow • v2 from reaction plane analysis • “A” is fit in non-jet region (0.75<||<2.24)

  40. Angular Distribution: Central Au+Au data vs. pp+flow

  41. 3/4 /4 Out-of-plane y x in-plane -3/4 -/4 Dj correlations vs the reaction plane pTtrigger=4-6 GeV/c, 2<pTassociated<pTtrigger, ||<1 Back-to-back suppression out-of-plane stronger than in-plane Effect of path length on suppression is experimentally accessible

  42. What does it mean? Surface emission • The backward going jet is missing in central Au-Au collisions when compared to p-p data + flow • The backward going jet is not suppressed in d-Au collisions • These data suggest opaque nuclear matter and surface emission of jets Suppression of back-to-back correlations in central Au+Au collisions

  43. Exp: Conclusions About Nuclear Matter at RHIC • Its hot • Chemical freeze out at 175 MeV • Thermal freeze out at 100 MeV • The universal freeze out temperatures are surprisingly flat as a function of s • Its fast • Transverse expansion with an average velocity greater than 0.55 c • Large amounts of anisotropic flow (v2) suggest hydrodynamic expansion and high pressure at early times in the collision history • Its opaque • Saturation of v2 at high pT • Suppression of high pT particle yields relative to p-p • Suppression of the away side jet • And its not inconsistent with thermal equilibrium • Excellent fits to particle ratio data with equilibrium thermal models • Excellent fits to flow data with hydrodynamic models that assume equilibrated systems

  44. ‘They say …’ • ‘Some theorists say’ we have discovered the Quark Gluon Plasma at RHIC • Evidence for PQCD via vn bulk collective flow of 104p, K,p,L, X, W • Evidence for pQCD jet quenching in Au+Au at RHIC • Evidence jet un-quenching in D+Au = Null Control • The experimental community is somewhat more cautious because, in part, its not clear what the words mean • Web definition for plasma: A low-density gas in which the individual atoms are charged, even though the total number of positive and negative charges is equal, maintaining an overall electrical neutrality. • In the collision of two heavy ions, we have found a high density plasma containing quarks and gluons. So whats the problem with the experimentalists?

  45. Are the theories a unique explanation for the data?

  46. Au+Au Datasets • This year: extremely successful run, all goals met • Greater than order of magnitude increase in dataset

  47. Rcp ratios At  =0 the central events have the ratio systematically above that of semi-central events. We see a reversal of behavior as we study events at =3.2 1/<Ncollcentral> NABcentral(pT,h) Rcp= 1/<Ncoll periph> NABperiph(pT,h)

  48. RdAu ratios Cronin like enhancement at =0. Clear suppression as  changes up to 3.2 Same ratio made with dn/d follows the low pT RdAu 1 d2Nd+Au/dpTdh RdA= <Ncoll> d2Nppinel/dpTdh where < Ncoll> = 7.2±0.3

  49. Current State of Affairs • A theory is something nobody believes, except the person who made it. • An experiment is something everybody believes, except the person who made it. • attributed to Albert Einstein

  50. Recombination Tested The complicated observed flow pattern in v2(pT)d2n/dpTdf ~ 1 + 2 v2(pT) cos (2 f) is predicted to be simple at the quark level underpT → pT / n , v2 → v2 / n , n = 2,3 for meson,baryon if the flow pattern is established at the quark level Compilation courtesy of H. Huang

More Related