GLOBAL WARMING. Johan C. Varekamp Earth & Environmental Sciences Wesleyan University Middletown CT. Structure of this presentation 1. Global Warming-real or not? 2. Climate science, models and predictions. Source: OSTP. Variations of the Earth’s Surface Temperature*.
01 / 86Johan C. Varekamp Earth & Environmental Sciences Wesleyan University Middletown CT
1 / 17
Télécharger la présentation
Johan C. Varekamp Earth & Environmental Sciences Wesleyan University Middletown CT
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
F I N
Plus de contenu associé
Transcription de la présentation
GLOBAL WARMING Johan C. Varekamp Earth & Environmental Sciences Wesleyan University Middletown CT
So these are the data:There is global warming, ice is melting, glaciers are retreating, rainfall patterns are changing, plants and animal species are “moving”, sea level is rising.The real BIG question is:Natural Variability or the “Human Hand”?
THE GREENHOUSE EFFECTTHE SUN EMITS SHORT WAVELENGTH RADIATION (‘VISIBLE LIGHT’) WHICH PENETRATES THROUGH THE ATMOSPHERE AND HEATS THE SOLID EARTH.THE SOLID EARTH EMITS LONG WAVE LENGTH RADIATION (‘INFRA RED’) WHICH IS ABSORBED ‘ON ITS WAY OUT’ BY THE GREENHOUSE GASES.A THERMAL BLANKET IS THE RESULT
Principles of terrestrial climate: Incoming solar radiation equals outgoing terrestrial radiation Rsun = Rterr The magnitude of Rterr depends on Ts (Boltzman Law). Part of the outgoing terrestrial radiation is blocked by greenhouse gases, and the earth warms up a bit to restore the radiative equilibrium
ANTHROPOGENIC CARBON FLUXES IN THE 1990s: FOSSIL FUEL BURNING: 6 BILLION TONS CARBON/YEAR DEFORESTATION: 1.1 BILLION TONS CARBON/YEAR TOTAL: 7.1 BILLION TONS CARBON/YEAR WHERE IS ALL THAT CO2 GOING??
How do we model future atmospheric CO2 concentrations? • Apply a carbon cycle model to a range of future Fossil Fuel Flux scenarios • Use ‘economic scenarios’ that depend strongly on • Population growth rates • Economic growth • Switch to alternative energy technologies • Sharing of technology with the developing world
To go from atmospheric CO2 concentration change to climate change, we need to know the climate sensitivity parameter, l. The common approach is: DTs = lDForDF/DTs = 1/l where DF is the ‘radiative forcing’ caused by the increased CO2 concentration. The value of DF can be calculated from the increase in CO2 concentration using an integrated version of deBeers law. DTs is the change in the surface temperature of the earth We can solve for l by taking the first derivative of the ‘greenhouse modified’ Boltzman’s Law F = t sTs4 or dF/dTs = 4F/Ts leading to a l value of 0.3 K/Wm-2. That value equals 0.27 K/Wm-2 for an earth with similar albedo but no atmosphere (no greenhouse). This approach is the most fundamental response function and uses zero climate feedbacks! Climate models use 0.3 - 0.9 K/Wm-2, incorporating various positive and negative feedbacks.
Temperature Projections (TAR) • Global average temperature is projected to increase by 1.5 to 5.8 °C in 21th century • Projected warming larger than in SAR • Projected rate of warming is high compared to the climate record Source: IPCC TAR 2001
If we continue as we have done for the last 100 years (business-as-usual scenario), we will be looking at a much warmer earth, with many unpredictable side effects (sea level, extreme events, changes in carbon cycle -methane in tundras, methane in clathrates, etc)
The Kyoto Protocol • Main aim is to stabilize the concentrations of CO2 and the other GHG in the atmosphere through reductions in carbon emissions • Direct Goal: reduce carbon emissions by ~ 5 % below 1990 emission levels in 1012 • Uses trading of ‘carbon pollution units’ as an incentive for the economically least painful way • Net effect would be that atmospheric CO2 concentrations in 2012 would be about 1-2 ppm below non-treaty levels!
141 countries have ratified the treaty (55% of the carbon emissions), with the big absences in the western world being the USA (20 % of the carbon emissions) and Australia. Large carbon contributors from the emerging economies (but growing fast!) are China, India and Brazil, which are exempt from the protocol.
Estuary of National Importance • The Urban Sea – more than 28 million people live within a one-hour drive from its shores • LIS contains over 18 trillion gallons of water • LIS watershed > 16,000 square miles • LIS is 170 km long, 30 km wide, mean depth 20 m • A source of food, recreation, and commerce