1 / 15

GOING PUBLIC – THE PROCESS, LEGAL ASPECTS AND ALTERNATIVES

GOING PUBLIC – THE PROCESS, LEGAL ASPECTS AND ALTERNATIVES. Interaction Between US/UK and Israeli Law November 8, 2006 Daniel K. Gamulka. Accessing Global Markets Requires Compliance with Multiple Regimes. Israel Companies Law, 1999 Israel Securities Law, 1968

sybill-velasquez
Télécharger la présentation

GOING PUBLIC – THE PROCESS, LEGAL ASPECTS AND ALTERNATIVES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GOING PUBLIC – THE PROCESS, LEGAL ASPECTS AND ALTERNATIVES Interaction Between US/UK and Israeli Law November 8, 2006 Daniel K. Gamulka

  2. Accessing Global Markets Requires Compliance with Multiple Regimes • Israel Companies Law, 1999 • Israel Securities Law, 1968 • Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (US) • Stock Exchange Regulations • Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (UK) • EU Prospectus Directive

  3. Offering Rules • Principally jurisdiction of offering • Israeli securities law may affect various aspects: • Avoiding public offering in Israel • Institutional road show • Employees • 35 offerees in any 12-month period • Impact of local laws to certain issuers: • Regulatory • Government grants

  4. Corporate Governance • Principally Israeli law • All provisions of Israeli corporate law apply, unless specifically exempted • In US, Sarbanes-Oxley greatly expanded US role in corporate governance of foreign companies • Stock exchanges (NYSE, NASDAQ, LSE, AMEX) impose additional requirements • Israeli company listed abroad must meet all requirements, sometimes conflicting, unless exempted

  5. Corporate Governance (cont’d) • Board of Directors • Israeli Law: • Two “external” directors (dahatzim) • Elected by shareholders by a special majority • U.S. stock exchanges: • Require a majority of independent directors who are elected in same manner as other directors

  6. Examples • Board of Directors • U.S. stock exchanges: (cont’d) • Definition of independence • Differs from definition for audit committee purposes • Differences between U.S. and Israel • Differences between U.K. and Israel • NYSE and NASDAQ exemptions from foreign private issuers (including most Israeli companies) • Underwriters may require or recommend compliance • Company may want to adopt “Best Practice” even if exemption available

  7. Examples • Board of Directors • UK/Combined Code on Corporate Governance: • Except for smaller companies, majority of independent, non-executive directors • Division between Chairman and CEO. • AIM: More flexible: • Minimum of two independent directors for smaller AIM companies

  8. Examples • Audit Committees • Israeli Law: • At least 3 members • Including two “external directors” (dahatzim) • Principally focused on related party conflicts • U.S. Stock Exchanges: • All members must be “independent directors” • Principally focused on oversight of financial reporting.

  9. Examples • Audit Committees • U.K. / Combined Code: • LSE – • At least 3 directors (2 for small companies) • all of whom independent non-executives • monitor internal and external audit functions • AIM – • In majority of cases sponsor will require compliance with combined code • Makeup and role can be more flexible for smaller companies

  10. Examples • Other Committees • Israeli Law • One external director on each committee • No committees required, other than audit committee. • U.S. exchanges - • Compensation and nomination committees (or majority of independent directors, for NASDAQ)

  11. Examples • Other Committees • U.S. exchanges (cont’d) • Compensation and nominations committees comprised of solely independent directors • NYSE and NASDAQ exemptions for foreign private issuers • Underwriters may require or recommend compliance • UK/Combined Code: • Audit, remuneration and nominations committees • Comprised of independent, non-executive directors • Only committee members entitled to attend meetings

  12. Examples • Shareholder Approval Requirements • Stock Option Plans: • Israel: shareholder approval required for grants of options to directors and controlling shareholders • U.S. exchanges: Shareholder approval for all option plans; exemptions for foreign private issuers. • U.K.: • LSE: Shareholder approval required, unless plan available to all employees on same terms • AIM: No approval required

  13. Examples • Shareholder Approval Requirements • Related party transactions: • Israel: shareholder approval required, at times with special majority • U.S. exchanges: shareholder approval required in cases of securities issuances • U.K.: • LSE: shareholder approval required, related party not counted in vote • AIM: no shareholder approval required; announcement and directors’ statement required for certain transactions with related parties

  14. Examples • Exemptions/Relief: • Israel: Regulatory exemptions for companies listed abroad or dual listed. • Reporting requirements • Means of convening shareholders meeting • External director-terms and compensation • Proxy rules

More Related